Two lawyers dead. Can Saddam trial take place?

Who would possibly work as a defense lawyer for the defendants since clearly they are taking their lives in their hands if they do?
For the most part, it’s going to be people that believed in Saddam Hussein. But it could also be someone who believes fervently in the right to a fair trial. 

You can be a defense lawyer and defend someone you believe is guilty of the crime they are accused of, but also believe that person deserves a good defense. So, anyone who believes in that premise could stand up as a defense attorney for Saddam or his co-defendants.

But, it is likely in this situation to be someone who is a Sunni, or who is disenfranchised, and who believes that that the trial is unfair.

Do they know who is responsible for these attacks? What are their motives?
They don’t know. Saddam’s lead attorney was on al Jazeera TV [soon after the news broke] and he accused the government. But they don’t know who is responsible. There will clearly have to be some sort of investigation.

There is a lot of militia warfare going on between Shiite groups and Sunni groups — with local violence and accusations flying all over — but there is very little proof. So, for the moment, we don’t know. So, that creates a climate of fear as well.

Does there seem to be any irony in the fact that it’s the defense attorneys that are being targeted? Since, as far as we know here, the insurgents in Iraq have typically been supporters of Saddam?
Yeah, I think it is a little unusual. The majority of the targets seem to be Shiite and this is different. But, then again, there seems to be an increase in this sort of local — I’m not sure if it is militia violence or who is perpetrating it — but, there seems to be an increase in this sort of tit-for-tat, or ethnic violence. So, in light of that context, it doesn’t surprise me. 

And in light of the passion and extent of people’s feelings about Saddam Hussein, it is not surprising. Saddam is obviously a flashpoint for so many people and they feel very strongly about him in different ways. So, in that sense, perhaps it is a harbinger of worse things to come. You hope not, but who knows.

What does it mean for the future of the Iraqi justice system in general?
I think that it becomes an issue of the short term, versus long term.

In the short term, it’s clearly not good to have anyone like this murdered with impunity or seemingly impunity, particularly in the middle of a legal proceeding. It raises all sorts of human rights concerns and concerns over the effectiveness and fairness of this trial.

However, in the longer term, there is promise. If Iraq could have a trial that in the end is fair, that would be a good thing. Right now, the short term obviously doesn’t seem rosy in that sense.

But just because Saddam Hussein seems guilty, that doesn’t mean that he doesn’t deserve a fair trial. That’s the basis of a free society and that has to happen, one way or the other.

MORE FROM MIDEAST & N. AFRICA

Mideast & N. Africa Section Front

Dubai’s debt woes cast shadow 25 countries tell Iran to ax nuke program British envoy: U.S. was 'hell bent' on Iraq war Muslims cast stones on third day of hajj Dubai’s debt crisis jolts markets U.N. monitor: Iran nuke inquiry at ‘dead end’ Newsweek: The myth of terrorism in North Africa Dubai debt plea sends fear around world Muslim pilgrims get respite from rain Iran seizes Nobel Peace Prize winner's medal Mideast & N. Africa Section Front   Add Mideast & N. Africa headlines to your news reader: