Cameron Diaz: America’s spaz-heart

It’s not every statuesque blonde who gets to start out as a Seventeen cover girl, land her first acting gig opposite a heavily CGI-ed Jim Carrey, and wind up, less than a decade later, being directed by Martin Scorsese and co-starring with several Oscar nominees and winners. But that’s exactly what happened to Miss Cameron Diaz — from “The Mask” to “Gangs Of New York” in just eight short years, with stops along the way for mega-budgeted cheesecake flicks (“Charlie’s Angels”), respectable indies that allowed her to show how serious she was by getting all ugly (“Being John Malkovich”), and the apparently unstoppable “Shrek” franchise.

This week, Diaz finds herself, once again, among the Oscar-rich company of Toni Collette, Shirley MacLaine and director Curtis Hanson. Is this more evidence that Diaz has grown more choosy with her projects than she was back in the “Feeling Minnesota” era? Or has Diaz just fallen backward into a successful film career out of sheer luck?

Sarah D. Bunting
“In Her Shoes” is the first film project Diaz has appeared in since 2002 that isn’t a sequel. She also hosted that inanely named travel show, “Trippin’,” which no one watched, and assaulted various photographers (not that I blame her, but still), and broke up and got back together with Justin Timberlake eleventeen times. Maybe she didn’t have a choice about doing “Charlie’s Angels: Full Throttle,” but the overall impression I get is not that thoughtful decision-making is a strength of hers. Again: she keeps getting back together with Justin Timberlake. Dude looks like an Ewok and grabbed Janet Jackson’s boob on national television.

So, I would have to go with “sheer luck,” and I would have to include in that the fact that she got model genes — I don’t think she got the part in “Mask” because she blew the room away with her thespionics. She got it because she’s pretty and she can really wear clothes.

She’s a decent actress, I guess, but she’d better hope her looks hold, because she’s not Meryl Streep and she doesn’t appear to have a Plan B.

Tara Ariano
Yeah, I don’t really get how she got this reputation as a raving beauty. Her features are weirdly squished up at the bottom of her face. Word is (from those who have HDTV) that she has horrible skin, and although there’s this mythos surrounding her ass, I…don’t see it. By which I mean I do not see her ass; to me it looks totally flat. Not that I’m Christy Turlington over here, myself, but no one’s putting me on magazine covers and acting like I’m God’s gift.

FREE VIDEO Cameron Diaz on 'In Her Shoes' Oct. 3: Actress Cameron Diaz talks with "Today" host Katie Couric about her new movie, "In Her Shoes." Today show

Sarah
If I had to guess, I’d say it boils down to: big smile, blonde hair and no fat on her, anywhere. Then again, I don’t fall into Diaz’s target demographic, really.

Tara
The other half of Diaz’s appeal, however, apart from her looks, is her reputation as a guy’s girl. Magazine profiles on her — still, to this day — make a big fat deal out of telling us how much she eats, how bad her table manners are, how gleefully she belches, how loud and inelegant her laugh is and so on.

The official line seems to be that she’s her “There’s Something About Mary” character come to life — a game, dorky football fan who likes to eat junk food and watch “SportsCenter” in bed. Or, in other words, every man’s fantasy. Diaz hasn’t gone back to the “Mary” well all that much, but if and when the sexpot roles run dry, she’ll have that persona to fall back on.

MORE FROM TARA VS SARAH

Cameron Diaz: America’s spaz-heart

Cameron Diaz: America’s spaz-heart Kate Hudson: Still ‘almost famous’ John Cusack hasn’t outgrown Lloyd Dobler Will the real Natalie Portman please stand up? Drew Barrymore: Real or fembot? Sandra Bullock: The perfect girl next door Keanu Reeves: Wooden wonder boy Jennifer Garner: Not quite A-list ready Chick Flicks: Embarrassment or pleasure?   Add Tara vs Sarah headlines to your news reader: