Skip navigation
advertisement
sponsored by 

Some Net phone users can't re-use numbers

FCC doesn't require portability from VoIP providers

  Tech Holiday Gift Guide  
  More
Holiday Retail
10 best PlayStation 3 games of 2009
With a slew of exclusive games, the PlayStation 3 is finally hitting its stride.

  Real Women’s Guide to Technology

An MSN special that focuses on consumer technologies that can benefit women.

Tech and gadgets videos
Texting may be bad for you
Dec. 17: New studies find that texting is not only bad for your eyes, but can cause chronic pain in the neck, shoulders and fingers. Dr. Nancy Snyderman talks with opthamalogist Dr. Roger Steinert and spine surgeon Dr. Charles Rosen.

Video
Tech Watch
The latest in technology and entertainment news.
  Auto Tech

A better economy may lure buyers, but these trends could seal the deal.

Go to Auto Tech

updated 9:39 p.m. ET Sept. 29, 2005

NEW YORK - Kirsten Dixson was proud to be an early adopter when she signed up her career coaching business for Internet-based telephone service earlier this year.

She soon came to regret her tech savvy when bad sound quality made her long for traditional phone service. Then the other shoe dropped — she couldn't take her number with her to another provider.

As so-called voice over Internet protocol, or VoIP, gets more popular, providers are faced with a relatively new issue: how to handle customer turnover. There are no exact figures on how many customers have tried to switch their numbers away from VoIP providers, but the Federal Communications Commission says that a total of 41.7 million phone numbers got transferred last year, including land lines and cellular.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

The number of U.S. residential VoIP customers increased by 750,000 in the second quarter to 2.44 million, according to Bernstein Research. That growth rate is expected to accelerate.

The FCC does not require VoIP providers to follow number portability requirements the way wireless and regular phone companies must.

But that could soon change. The issue falls into something of a gray area, and legal experts disagree on whether the rulings apply to VoIP providers.

"The issue is pending before the FCC, but if you look the way number portability has been addressed in the wireless context, it would be fair to say it should be extended to voice over IP," said Roz Allen, a partner in the government practice at the law firm Holland + Knight.

The issue has also caught the attention of both the House and Senate, which recently came out with legislative proposals that would give VoIP users the same rights to number portability.

Part of the reason companies have lagged in offering number portability is because it's so difficult. To move a number, both companies — the one being dumped and the new provider — need to verify information and coordinate on a transfer date.

Different providers require slightly different information and incomplete or slight inconsistencies in the fillouts — St. versus Street, for instance — can cause requests to be kicked back. Improvements have been made, but more are needed.

To enable the process, phone carriers have had to invest millions on new software programs, developing new procedures and hiring additional personnel. Larger companies, such as Verizon Communications Inc. or Comcast Corp. have largely automated the process. But smaller companies don't have the same kind of resources to invest, which means that dealing with them means communicating by fax and phone.

"Many chose initially not to port numbers because of the complexities involved," said Dan Kokoruda, a program manager at consulting firm Business Edge who has worked with a number of carriers on business and technical issues from number portability. "It's a very onerous process," he added.


Resource guide