As cell phone use grows, so does tower debate

Yet fear of the uncertainty remains. A year ago, the International Association of Fire Fighters opposed the use of fire houses for cell sites “until a study with the highest scientific merit” proves they are safe.

The American Cancer Society’s Web site says that because the technology is still relatively new, “we do not yet have full information on health effects.” However, the organization noted there was no known evidence of a link between low-level emissions and cancer.

Still, the perception of a health risk, combined with what some consider an eyesore, can lower property values for those living near a cell site, O’Brien said.

Cell sites can be a financial boon to those who provide space for them. Cell companies won’t discuss rent, but Donohue said companies typically pay $800 to $2,000 per month, depending on location, the size of the tower or antenna, and other factors. That can be a significant amount for a struggling school district or a church with stagnant or declining membership.

Residents of St. Louis’ South Hampton neighborhood first learned of Southampton Presbyterian’s plan to rent space to T-Mobile in 2003. Immediately, they mobilized against it. A petition opposing the cell antenna was signed by more than 250 people.

When talks failed, residents turned to zoning officials who ruled against T-Mobile. The city’s Board of Adjustment agreed, ruling the antenna could have “a negative impact on the health of children and residents” and would cause property values to decrease.

T-Mobile sued. U.S. Magistrate Judge Frederick Buckles ruled in favor of the company in July.

Debbie Barrett, a spokeswoman for suburban Seattle-based T-Mobile, said the company is doing everything it can to make the site blend in. But she said the antenna is needed.

“We have a responsibility not only to our customers but to the public agencies that benefit from our 911 service,” Barrett said.

Southampton’s pastor, Will Mason, said the antenna will not extend beyond the top of the chimney, will sit flush against in, will even be painted the same shade of white as the chimney. Neither he nor T-Mobile would disclose the rental fee.

Mason said he spent months studying health effects of cell sites, the impact on property values. He believes the antenna is harmless.

“It wasn’t all that kindly to be demonized, but we’re over it,” Mason said. “We’ve tried to work with the neighborhood association and the folks opposed to the antenna.”

Still, O’Brien said neighbors feel betrayed. Parishioners on Sunday morning used to be met with a smile and a wave from neighbors. Now, he said, they’re met with angry glares.

“Almost every one of my neighbors says they’re going to move if this thing goes up,” O’Brien said.

MORE FROM WIRELESS

Wireless Section Front

Teen drivers ignore anti-texting laws Study: Most U.S. wireless users satisfied AT&T: Tighter control of cell data usage ahead 10 iPhone apps for the holidays that sparkle FCC questions Verizon about doubling fee Man in stolen cell phone pic turns himself in Think your kid isn't ‘sexting’? Think again No cell phone, brain tumor link, study says CNBC: Google searches for mobile edge GPS cell phone apps challenge standalone devices Wireless Section Front   Add Wireless headlines to your news reader: