Skip navigation

High court nominee could be hot election topic

Background in 2004 races, nomination may have big impact in 2006, 2008

  SPECIAL REPORT
On first case, Alito splits with right
New Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito split with the court’s conservative Wednesday night, refusing to let Missouri execute a death-row inmate contesting lethal injection.

NBC Video: Politics
Tea partiers heckle grieving grandparents
Nov. 25: A couple who lost their daughter-in-law and unborn grandchild due to health issues and a lack of insurance was heckled at a recent town hall. Midge and Dan Huff talk to msnbc’s Ed Schultz. The Huffington Post’s Roy Sekoff offers analysis.

Slideshow
Image: The Week in Poltical Cartoons
  The Week in Political Cartoons
Msnbc.com’s political cartoonists take a look back at the past week.

more photos

By Mark Murray
Deputy political director
NBC News
updated 6:25 p.m. ET July 7, 2005

Mark Murray
Deputy political director

WASHINGTON — All it took was a three-sentence letter announcing her retirement, but Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s decision last week to step down from the Supreme Court has quickly transformed Washington into a political combat zone. War rooms are humming. Campaign-style TV ads are up and running. And politicians are already debating the rules of engagement. In fact, some are even comparing the process to find and confirm O’Connor’s successor to a presidential campaign. 

Yet there’s a bit of irony to all of this — the Supreme Court was rarely discussed during the 2004 presidential race. Indeed, neither President Bush nor John Kerry ran TV ads about the court and its impact; neither mentioned it in their convention speeches; and just one question was devoted to it in the three presidential debates. Instead, the 2004 campaign focused mostly on terrorism, Iraq, the economy, gas prices and health care.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

But if the court wasn’t a hot topic last year, Democrats, Republicans, and political analysts all believe that a battle over O’Connor’s vacancy could play a significant role in the 2006 and 2008 elections. “If there is a big fight, it will be an issue,” said Republican strategist Charlie Black. “(But) it is impossible to say until you know who the nominee is.”

Court was background noise in 2004
To be sure, the Supreme Court wasn’t entirely ignored in the 2004 Bush-Kerry contest. During a campaign event in August, Kerry told a Wisconsin crowd about its importance. “You want three words to motivate you,” he said. “The Supreme Court. There you go. That’s all you need.”

The Democratic National Committee also ran print ads in African-American newspapers about the court. “So who do you want filling three potential vacancies on the Supreme Court? Those who are pro-Republican or those who are pro-you?” And it came up as an issue during the Democratic primaries.

Yet, for the most part, the Supreme Court was mostly background noise. One reason, political strategists say, is that a vacancy doesn’t interest most voters until it happens. Furthermore, it’s liberal and conservative special-interest groups — not your average voters — that tend to pay attention to the court.

But Democrats say that could change in upcoming elections, especially if Bush’s nominee to replace O’Connor — and also perhaps future nominees — votes to reverse Roe v Wade or other important decisions. Indeed, Democrats argue that if this happens, it could erase some of the gains Republicans have made with women voters. (In 2004, according to exit polls, Bush won 48 percent of female voters; in 2000, he won 43 percent of them; and in 1996, Bob Dole won 38 percent.) 

“If Bush picks a right-wing person who votes to overturn Roe, it would have a disastrous impact on the Republican Party,” said Democratic political adviser Steve Elmendorf. “The issue has a real potential to drive away the moderate women who voted for Bush because of security.”

Female voters returning to Democrats
Karen White, the national political director of the pro-choice Democratic group Emily’s List, agrees with Elmendorf. “I do believe that women voters are going to retaliate,” she said. As an example, White points out that Clarence Thomas’s bruising 1991 Supreme Court confirmation — during which he was accused of sexually harassing Anita Hill — galvanized American women, helping to boost Emily’s List’s membership and also the ranks of women serving in Congress after the 1992 election. 

Moreover, White cites a recent Emily’s List poll showing that female voters already seem to be flocking back to the Democrats: 43 percent of women say they’d vote for a Democratic candidate in 2006, while 32 percent say they’d vote Republican, and one-third of female Bush voters indicate they might not vote for Republicans next year.


Sponsored links

Resource guide