‘Big Brother’: So awful, yet so addictive
Fans remain fascinated with CBS’ big summer reality show
![]() | Despite major flaws and dull contestants, CBS' "Big Brother" has been a summer reality staple for five years. |
Cliff Lipson / CBS |
Television video |
Sesame Street says it wasn’t trashing Fox News Nov. 6: A 2-year-old episode of Sesame Street has the television show in the hot seat as they celebrate their 40th birthday. Conservative bloggers claimed that it cast Fox News in a bad light. |
One morning a few years ago, I found myself watching people sleep. One was snoring. The others were barely moving. I was entranced. And embarrassed.
They were in a trailer in the parking lot of CBS Studio City. I was in Chicago, watching via the Internet. The people were “houseguests” inside the southern California “Big Brother” compound. Inside the camera-covered studio/house, where they agreed to live until they were voted off the reality TV show, the contestants ate, slept, talked, and occasionally participated in challenges. They were competing for $500,000, but by watching them all day, it’d have been nearly impossible to tell that they were anything more than the world’s dullest individuals.
Yet they were the stars of a show that aired three times per week on network television, one that has managed to survive for five years, despite its festering flaws. And it is most certainly flawed.
The series is hosted by Julie Chen, described by one critic as “spectacularly incompetent” for her wooden, stilted delivery and stunning cluelessness. The lame challenges that the houseguests compete in are usually either overly complicated or not at all interesting to watch on television. And as the series progresses, what happens in the house seems to be a repeat of the Stanford Prison Experiment, as producers manipulate houseguests who become increasingly paranoid and delusional.
Still: I can’t wait for “Big Brother 6” to begin.
“Big Brother” is not CBS’ most popular reality show, but arguably it has the most devoted reality TV audience, one that obsesses over it literally 24 hours a day, seven days a week, for three full months. Perhaps more than any other reality series, “Big Brother” engenders a love-hate relationship with its fans, as it manages to be provoking, entertaining, insufferable, and hateful all at once.
Tending chickens! Making pancakes!
The series has come a long way in five years, but in terms of production values, “Big Brother 5” still seemed like it was filmed in a low-rent public access studio and edited on a Commodore 64. There’s a reason for some of that, as the crew has an unparalleled challenge in reality television: they have to assemble three hour-long stories per week in real-time, editing as life goes on.
In part because of this enormous challenge, and in part because producers tried to carbon-copy the UK format of the show for its US debut, the show was a miserable failure its first year. With voting left in the hands of viewers, the most inflammatory — and interesting — cast members were voted off immediately. That left people such as a strange man who liked to dress up like a chicken and a guy who spent one of his remaining evenings in the house getting drunk, stripping to his underwear, and dancing suggestively with a broom, all before dying his hair blue and passing out in the house’s tiny back yard. The cast that remained had to care for a flock of chickens while they wandered around a blandly decorated trailer and made pancakes.
Even then, though, fans were so engaged with the series that they started hiring planes to tow banners over the house’s back yard, sending the houseguests messages such as, “Big Brother is worse than you think. Get out now.” (Instead of seizing the moment and making interactive television history, the arrogant producers kept up the show’s theme of complete isolation, keeping the houseguests locked inside every time a plane came near.)
After that first season, we had cast members getting drunk on NyQuil, a doctor pretending he had cancer to win sympathy, a woman cleaning the toilet with a fellow cast member’s toothbrush, and a drunk man who put a knife to a drunk woman’s throat and said, “Would you get mad if I killed you?” And that was all during “Big Brother 2.”
All of this sounds outrageously horrifying, ridiculously trashy, nearly pointless and thoroughly idiotic. Yet it’s hard to deny the appeal of "Big Brother," mostly because of its transparency.
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM MORE REALITY TV NEWS, FEATURES |
| Add More reality TV news, features headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide


