Court won't review Beastie Boys lawsuit

Jazz flutist contends rappers illegally sampled his work

Interviews, performances

John Mayer’s Details magazine cover shoot & interview, part II
Nov. 25: John Mayer talks about how he has a really hard time not singing along with Jeff Buckley's music and how he loves to sing INXS as drunk karaoke.

John Mayer’s Details magazine cover shoot & interview, Part I

Rihanna discusses her new album

Bon Jovi’s ‘Work for the Working Man’

Bon Jovi perform ‘Wanted Dead or Alive’

updated 12:24 p.m. ET June 13, 2005

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Monday declined to consider whether a 1992 Beastie Boys song infringed on the copyright of a jazz flutist's recording.

Without comment, justices let stand a lower court ruling against jazz artist James W. Newton. Newton contended that the punk rappers' "Pass the Mic" included a sample from his musical composition "Choir" without his full permission.

The Beastie Boys paid a licensing fee for the six-second, three-note segment of Newton's work, but failed to pay an additional fee to license the underlying composition.

Story continues below ↓

advertisement | your ad here

The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed to dismiss Newton's lawsuit alleging copyright infringement. The appeals court reasoned that the short segment in "Pass the Mic" was not distinctive enough to be considered Newton's work.

Several members and representatives of the jazz and independent artists community — including the American Composers Forum, the Electronic Music Foundation and Meet the Composer — had filed a joint friend-of-the-court brief in support of Newton.

They urged the Supreme Court to clarify the scope of copyright law, given the growing practice of digital sampling, or recording a portion of a previously existing song, they say increasingly infringes on their ownership rights.

The case is Newton v. Diamond, 04-1219.