Skip navigation

‘Bioidentical’ hormones: Are they better?

Some doctors are prescribing ‘natural’ products to deal with menopause. Dr. Judith Reichman discusses this controversial subject

Dr. Judith Reichman
'Today' show contributor

E-mail
Slide show
Image: The Biggest Loser
  Biggest losers: Before and after
See the amazing transformations and pounds shed by the season five contestants.

more photos

20 worst foods in America16 secrets restaurants don't want you to knowBeware! 15 foods that can fool you 12 germiest placesHow to lose 10 pounds...without really trying! 20 saltiest foods in America exposedHealth by the numbers
By Dr. Judith Reichman
"Today" show contributor
updated 3:07 p.m. ET May 31, 2005

Q: I’m starting menopause. Are bioidentical hormones better or safer than commercial products?

A: The term “bioidentical” is almost as ingenious as the term “natural” when it comes to marketing a product; both terms appeal to consumers’ aversion to “artificial” ingredients, and they suggest that what you are getting can have no adverse effects. But I and many of the physicians and researchers who have looked at studies or tested what’s in these so-called “nature-made” products disagree.

When used by compounding pharmacies and authors touting their own books and products, the word “bioidentical” usually refers to formulations of various types of estrogens, progestins and androgens (male hormones) concocted within creams, gels, lotions, capsules, drops, tablets and even suppositories. (Compounding pharmacies are special drug stories that prepare and dispense formulations beyond those wholesaled by pharmaceutical companies.)

Story continues below ↓
advertisement

When it comes to estrogen, these formulations are often a combination of weak forms of estrogen (estrone or estriol) as well as estradiol, (the form of estrogen that is found in most commercial products and which, by the way, your ovaries produce). The mixers and makers of these products claim that their combination of the estrogens is either safer or more “natural” than pharmaceutical estrogens which are usually either plant-derived estradiol, or conjugated estrogen made from the urine of pregnant mares.

To date, no clinical studies published in reputable peer-review journals have shown this to be true. The claim that one form of estrogen, estriol, may reduce the risk of breast cancer, is speculative. The studies quoted in support of that theory are old and probably obsolete.

I know a lot of women have been told they can use a progesterone cream to normalize their hormones, alleviate symptoms of menopause and prevent osteoporosis. There are even claims that such creams can prevent breast cancer.

  HEALTH  
Healthy whole-grain cereal? Think again
More than 20,000 new foods and beverages were introduced into your grocery store, claiming to be natural, organic, low-fat or super-nutritious. Learn how to distinguish the real nutritious foods from sneaky impostors -- and replace them with healthy alternatives.

However, clinical trials in which progesterone creams were added to estrogen did not show any reduction in the women’s risk of bone loss. And an article in the respected medical journal The Lancet has concluded that the best-known progesterone cream, Progest, does not raise blood progesterone enough to protect a woman from the abnormal uterine-tissue growth (hyperplasia) or the pre-cancer that may occur as a result of estrogen-only therapy.

Yams and soy also produce compounds that are used by the pharmaceutical industry to manufacture progestins. Your skin, however, does not have the enzymes to perform the chemical process needed to extract this hormone out of its plant source. Rubbing on a yam or soy cream (often marketed in health-food stores) will not render you richer for its hormones; all you are doing is applying a fairly expensive moisturizer whose main effect is to enrich the manufacturer.