Finding a roadmap to teach kids about Mideast

Winston Churchill said, "History is written by the victors." What, then, is written in the history books of two cultures still at odds?

A recent study conducted by Dr. Ruth Firer, an Israeli professor at Hebrew University, and Dr. Sami Adwan, a Palestinian professor at Bethlehem University, examines Israeli and Palestinian textbooks to find out what each side says — and doesn’t say — about the other.

In the Middle East, where the Arab-Israeli conflict has taken thousands of lives in just the last few years, the content of textbooks has always been a lightning rod for controversy, especially since Mahmoud Abbas was elected leader of the Palestinian Authority in January. 

Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon recently declared, “Palestinian education and propaganda are more dangerous to Israel than Palestinian weapons.” Sharon has demanded that Abbas take steps to “immediately” replace the “inflammatory” texts. 

For his part, Abbas has told Israel it’s time to look in the mirror and change its own educational system.   

History dictates future
What has precipitated this focus on education? According to Dr. Herbert Kelman, the Richard Clark Cabot Research Professor of Social Ethics at Harvard University, education has become a litmus test, measuring how sincere a side is in wanting to make peace.   

“[Textbooks] tell you what is being taught to the next generation,” explained Kelman. “If you are really out to make peace, you should not be teaching your children hatred and delegitimizing each other.”    

According to Dr. Sami Adwan, a professor of education at Bethlehem University, education is extremely influential because of its enormous reach. “There are over a million [Palestinian] children in school,” he explained. “Imagine how powerful that is.” 

Differences over history textbooks continue to riddle nations the world over.

The incredible outcry and massive protests in China recently over new Japanese textbooks that Chinese critics claim whitewashes Tokyo’s atrocities and militarism during World War II, demonstrates just how raw emotions can be sixty years later.

Some Japanese, for their part have turned the table, criticizing China’s schoolbooks for portraying an unbalanced look at its own Communist history.

Unlikely collaboration
In an effort to counter just those sort of problems, when the Oslo peace talks were promoting an environment for cooperation between Israelis and Palestinians in the early nineties, Adwan met Dr. Ruth Firer, a researcher at The Harry S. Truman Research Institute for the Advancement of Peace and a pioneer in textbook research. They decided to join forces and perform a comprehensive study of Palestinian and Israeli history and civics textbooks.  

Firer looked at the Israeli texts, Adwan studied the Palestinian books, and The Georg Eckert Institute for International Textbook Research in Germany oversaw the project, acting as an objective intermediary.

Jonathon Kriener, a Research Fellow at the Institute explained, "The aim of reviewing Israeli and Palestinian textbooks is to make the debate over textbooks more rational, grounding it in scientific rather than political arguments.”

What Firer and Adwan found is that both sets of textbooks stick to their own narrative and version of events, do little to understand the other side, and therefore propagate the conflict. Narratives are particularly poignant in textbooks, explained Firer, “because they are aimed at youngsters, so they have to be made simply and clearly.”  

Different “interpretations” of significant events
According to Adwan, while many of the same historical facts are presented in all the schoolbooks, their “interpretations” are very different. 

Israeli texts, for example, treat the Balfour Declaration of 1917 — in which the British Foreign Secretary endorsed the creation of a Jewish homeland in Palestine — as "legitimate."  Palestinian texts view the same declaration as “illegitimate” and an example of “Western colonialism.”

The 1948 Arab-Israeli War, which established Israel as an independent state, is described in Israeli texts as the "War of Independence."  Palestinian texts, however, describe the same event as "al naqba" or "catastrophe.” 

“It’s black and white according to the sides,” explained Firer. “The question has to be, can the Israeli side include the catastrophe of the Palestinians? Can the Palestinians mention Israel’s struggle for independence?”  

MORE FROM WORLD NEWS

World news Section Front

Authorities: Detained student left farewell video   Iraq shakes up security after bombings   U.S. assures N. Korea of ‘robust’ direct talks NYT: Climate deal likely to cost trillions of dollars Tiny nation fails in bid for tough climate action Petraeus warns new surge progress will be slow Chicago terror suspect pleads not guilty Details sketchy on bin Laden's whereabouts U.K. slaps 50 percent tax on bankers’ bonuses Oslo gears up for Obama visit World news Section Front   Add World news headlines to your news reader: