Shuttle launch
delayed until July

Ice hazards
Testing in just the past several weeks has shown that even small pieces of ice, 5 inches long by 2 inches wide, could do serious damage if it came off the tank at the worst possible moment. The testing also found that slushy ice is more hazardous than hard ice, because hard ice clings to the tank better during liftoff, said deputy shuttle program manager Wayne Hale.

Because NASA put so much effort into curbing foam loss in the wake of the Columbia accident, ice took a back seat and its hazards were not fully understood until now, the shuttle managers said. They said they knew all along that they might have to reassess the launch schedule, if testing showed ice to be a potentially deadly threat, which is what happened.

Technicians will install a heater at the uppermost joint of the tank’s oxygen line, something already planned for flights beyond Discovery’s. To add the heater on Discovery, the shuttle will have to be hauled back to its hangar, which will add days if not weeks to launch preparations.

NASA is also concerned about possible ice formation on the brackets that hold the oxygen line to the tank, but that should not require nearly as complicated a solution.

Engineers are considering other potential ice-prevention or -melting methods, such as installing infrared lamps at the pad and aiming them at the tank’s trouble spots, Hale said.

Whatever NASA tries to reduce the ice, engineers must be certain the so-called improvements cause no harm, Parsons said.

Other problems
The shuttle team is dealing with a few other unrelated problems with Discovery, involving balky engine-cutoff sensors in the fuel tank and thermal blankets contaminated recently with hydraulic fluid. Readdy said the extra two months will provide time to resolve these issues, and they will be tackled first while the shuttle is still at the launch pad.

Another fueling test of Discovery’s tank may be necessary, Readdy said. The April 14 test uncovered the intermittent sensor trouble and other problems.

Griffin said he accepted shuttle managers’ recommendation to postpone the flight, to perform the extra work.

“I want to launch as soon as we can,” said Griffin, who took over the top job two weeks ago. But he added that he wants the launch to be safe.

“Schedule matters,” he said. “It shouldn’t matter to the point of causing people to do dumb things or to take ill-advised actions.... We want to launch Discovery when we can because the completion of the international space station depends upon an expeditious launch schedule. We don’t want to launch it sooner than we can.”

Columbia went down on Feb. 1, 2003, because of a gash in the left wing that was caused by a suitcase-size piece of foam that broke off the tank during liftoff. All seven astronauts were killed 16 days later during re-entry.

NASA wants the first two post-Columbia launches held in daylight to ensure good photography of the shuttle and its fuel tank, which has been modified to prevent big pieces of foam insulation from coming off. Daylight also is needed over the North Atlantic in order to capture good photos of the fuel tank as it drops off eight minutes after liftoff.

The July window extends from July 13 until July 31. If Discovery does not fly in July, the next opportunity would come in September. The 12-day mission will supply much-needed supplies and replacement parts to the space station.

MORE FROM HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT

Human Spaceflight Section Front

New crew poised to launch to space station Space station trio lands safely in Kazakhstan Crew shrinks to two on space station Shuttle fliers land with families on their minds Astronauts surprised by holiday turkey dinners New dad-in-space: Focusing on shuttle job easy Plan for human mission to asteroid gains speed Space shuttle lifts off amid tons of tweets Countdown begins for NASA's uncertain future Space hotel says it's on schedule to open in 2012 Human Spaceflight Section Front   Add Human Spaceflight headlines to your news reader: