Frist, Reid work
on deal over
judge approvals

Officials said as part of an overall deal, Reid has indicated he is willing to allow the confirmation of Richard Griffin and David McKeague, both of whom Bush has twice nominated for the 6^th Circuit Court of Appeals. At the same time, the Democratic leader wants the nomination of Henry Saad scuttled. Democrats succeeded in blocking all three men from coming to a vote in 2004 in a struggle that turned on issues of senatorial prerogatives as well as ideology.

Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., has led the opposition to all three men. In remarks on the Senate floor in 2004, he noted that Republicans had refused even to hold hearings on two nominees that former President Bill Clinton made to the 6^th Circuit.

Spokesmen for Frist and Reid declined to comment on their private discussions, and no further details were available.

‘A lot of negotiations’
Other senators have referred vaguely in recent days to discussions surrounding Bush’s 6^th circuit nominations.

Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said Sunday there had been a “a lot of negotiations to try to get three judges from Michigan” confirmed.

Democrats drew criticism when they threatened to stop or slow the Senate’s business if Republicans ban judicial filibusters. Party leaders began stressing an alternative approach during the day, attempting to force debate on their own agenda rather than the president’s.

“I’ve always said that we’d make sure the Senate went forward, but we’re going to do it on our agenda, not their agenda,” Reid said.

Republicans can ban judicial filibusters by majority vote, and Democrats concede Frist may be only one or two votes shy of the necessary total. At the same time, internal GOP polling shows lagging public support, and no showdown is expected until next month at the earliest.

Senate Republicans have been warning Reid that Democrats could face a backlash if they stopped routine Senate business, noting that House Republicans and then-Speaker Newt Gingrich suffered politically after forcing a government shutdown in a 1995 budget fight with Clinton.

‘I’m not Newt Gingrich’
But Reid and other Democrats say they will let vital legislation out of the Senate. “I’m not Newt Gingrich,” Reid said. “I understand how the body works. We’re not going to close down the Senate. Far from it, we’re going to have a very active Senate.”

“Anything that’s vital, we will continue to move forward on: money for our troops or a highway bill or a transportation bill,” added Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., in a conference call. “But on other issues, what we are going to try to do is utilize the Senate rules to start focusing on issues that we think matter to the American people, whether it’s gas prices or education or health care.”

Reid on Monday also repeated his assertion that President Bush promised him that the White House would stay out of the Senate’s fight over the filibuster rule. “He either misspoke or was not being honest with me a week ago last Wednesday when he said they would not be getting involved,” Reid said.

Vice President Dick Cheney said Friday he would vote to ban the judicial filibuster if the Senate deadlocks, and called the Democrats’ filibuster threats “inexcusable.”

MORE FROM POLITICS

Politics Section Front

Obama rejects criticism on health legislation Dems, White House predict health care success   Several prosecutors probing health care deal Report: Campaign finance laws full of loopholes House Democrat announces switch to GOP Obama says ‘the worst is behind us’ Giuliani not running for NY Senate or governor Obama: Vacation plans hinge on health care NYT: Dems face challenge to merge health bills Could Ireland’s budget cuts be a model for U.S.? Politics Section Front   Add Politics headlines to your news reader: