Microsoft rejects charges it caved on gay rights

Microsoft: No shift in policy
Microsoft has barred discrimination based on sexual orientation since 1991 and has extended health care benefits to same-sex partners since 1993.

Tami Bergasse, a senior corporate spokeswoman for Microsoft, said Friday that the company’s stances on diversity and nondiscrimination had not changed and noted that Microsoft issued a letter in support of the Washington legislation, which has been introduced annually for many years, as recently as the last session.

Reports that Microsoft had rescinded its support for anti-discrimination policies misrepresented the company’s position, Bergasse said. “What the reality is is that we moved to a neutral position on this bill, and we did it well before the legislative session,” she said.

Bergasse said Microsoft’s government relations specialists chose to focus their legislative efforts this year on more central priorities “that have a direct impact on our industry and our business,” specifically computer privacy, education, competitiveness and transportation. She did not rule out that the company could support the measure again in the future, saying it reassessed its legislative priorities every year.

Bergasse would not answer directly when asked several times why, if the company’s concern was its focus on its legislative priorities, it felt it had to take any action on the gay rights bill at all, especially a public change of position.

But she strongly denied that it was because of pressure from Hutcherson, who said in the New York Times article that the company “backed off” after a meeting this month with Bradford L. Smith, Microsoft’s general counsel. Hutcherson did not return calls for comment, but he was quoted in the Times as saying, “I told them I was going to give them something to be afraid of Christians about.”

Bergasse insisted that “this decision was not influenced by external factors.” She said that the company’s meetings with Hutcherson, the first of which was in February, took place “long after our decision to focus on the tighter legislative agenda.”

She said Hutcherson made several demands of the company, all of which were rebuffed. Microsoft, however, did ask two employees who testified in favor of the bill to clarify that they were speaking for themselves, not the company, she said.

Bergasse would not comment on GLEAM’s meeting with company executives this month, at which employees were characterized as having expressed shock and anger, because “we certainly respect the confidentiality of the meetings.”

“We understand that this is a very controversial issue with emotions on all sides,” she said. “Yes, we made a decision to take the neutral stance, but we remain very committed to providing the strongest anti-discrimination protections to our employees.”

MORE FROM U.S. NEWS

U.S. news Section Front

Aspiring reality TV stars crash Obama party Man dies after day stuck upside-down in cave Day of the super-turkey could be nigh Arsenal found at ex-doctor's Ohio apartment U.S. sets climate target ahead of summit Military families united by tragedies Nurse anesthetist accused of abuse 4 bodies found in suburban Chicago home Salvation Army kettles now take plastic 570,000 9/11 pager messages released U.S. news Section Front   Add U.S. news headlines to your news reader: