A sad day at Red Lake High
17-year old student kills 9, then himself, in deadliest act of school violence in the USA since Columbine
PROFILER'S PERSPECTIVE |
Former FBI profiler Clint Van Zandt shares his case insights, updates |
Verdict with Dan Abrams |
![]() MSNBC-TV |
You always know where Dan Abrams stands on the most talked about crime stories, biggest political conflicts and most confounding mysteries. Abrams examines (and cross examines) them all, ultimately deciding who are the day's biggest winners and losers. |
On Monday a 17-year old male student armed with two handguns and a shotgun entered Red Lake High School, located on a Minnesota Chippewa Indian reservation, and shot and killed a security guard, five students and a teacher, and injured as many as 15 others before taking his own life after being confronted by law enforcement officers. Prior to the school shootings the young gunman had shot and killed his grandparents. The shooter's deceased grandfather was a tribal police officer who was possibly murdered with his own police gun. The first person to be shot in the school was the security guard, followed by others. This was the deadliest incident of classroom violence in the United States since the 1999 shooting at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, one that accounted for the deaths of a teacher and 14 students, to include the two student shooters.
Since 1996 at least 110 students, teachers, relatives of school shooters and the shooters themselves have been shot to death in worldwide school shooting incidents, with dozens of other victims wounded and many hundreds still carrying the significant emotional scars left by their experiences. After every shooting the authorities and the affected communities must consider what caused an otherwise functional student, in one case only six years old, to bring a firearm into a school and begin shooting. One aftermath of such an act of inexplicable violence is the desire of school officials, law enforcement authorities, and community leaders to create a profile of a "typical" school shooter and then to juxtapose that profile over every student in every school in an attempt to identify and dissuade the next potential shooter. Similar to incidents of violence in the workplace, there is no "one profile fits all" in the area of adolescents who are likely to commit an act of violence such as a shooting in a school. Due to the sheer number of school shootings we have learned many things, to conclude that all shooters are not alike; many but not all shootings are revenge motivated; the shooter is not always a loner; and, access to weapons is not the most obvious risk factor present with such individuals.
Threats will many times precede a school shooting, and if a threat is made known to officials it may provide them with information concerning the motivation, the intent, and the ability of the person making the threat to carry out his threat. There are many different types of threats with certain risks attached to each type of threat. Independent studies of school shootings were conducted by both the FBI and the US Secret Service (USSS) after the Columbine tragedy. The FBI study considered a four-pronged approach to assessing the threat that a student may pose, to include the personality of the student, the family dynamics surrounding the potential shooter, the known school dynamics as related to the student's position in the school, and the ongoing social dynamics that the student may find himself involved in. The behavior of the affected student is of obvious importance, but behavior can change from day to day. What needs to be done is to consider the student's behavior as a whole, i.e., what is typical for the student, not how he necessarily reacts on a bad day.
Students who could possibly present a threat to themselves and others may intentionally or unintentionally reveal clues to their thoughts and intentions that may suggest a propensity to commit an act of violence. This clue letting or as a profiler or a psychologist would say "leakage," may be a lonely cry for help or the solicitous actions of an individual looking for assistance in his plan to act out violently against others. Many shooters exhibit narcissistic and psychopathic personalities, traits that should be obvious to school officials, but characteristics that may be disguised or simply viewed as normal adolescent challenges. Should a threat emanate from a student it should be immediately followed up on by the school administration and/or law enforcement. Study has shown that threats many times preceded school shootings, but they were dismissed as the frustrations of youth instead of looking at such threats as a marker along the path of an escalation process, one that, in the extreme, may lead to violence in the school setting. Although most students will not follow up on their threats, such continue to be one of the best pre-indicators of potential violence and should not simply be dismissed as the hollow words of a troubled youth.
The FBI has identified a number of other potential pre-incident indicators that, in and of themselves, are not a guarantee of future violent behavior, but the more such indicators are present, the greater the potential risk and threat that the affected student may present to himself and to others. Such indicators may include, but are not limited to the following:
An attitude of superiority; an exaggerated sense of entitlement; signs of depression; a failed relationship with another student; poor coping skills; a low tolerance for frustration; a self-centered attitude; alienation from the school and feelings of sadness and not belonging; an exaggerated need for attention; poor anger management skills; low self-esteem; the refusal to accept responsibility for his own actions; a lack of trust concerning others; rigidity in thought and opinion; poor family interaction; limited monitoring of the student by his parents, to include the constant playing of violent video games and research on violence related issues; access to weapons within the home; poor attachment to one's school; lack of respect for one's teachers and peers; use and abuse of drugs and alcohol; and, involvement with a limited peer group that has a fascination with violence or violence related groups. Revenge, problem solving and attention seeking were significant motives, but few shooters were thought to have had only a single motive for their actions.
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM PROFILER'S PERSPECTIVE |
| Add Profiler's Perspective headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide



