• November 7, 2005 |3:15 p.m. ET

The truth about an unlikely war hero

October was a particularly bloody month for American troops in Iraq - another 94 soldiers died there last month. And with the grim milestone of 2000 U.S. troop deaths reached in Iraq not long ago -- it seemed a good time to remember a particular vet who made the ultimate sacrifice.

Pat Tillman, the NFL pro-Bowler who died in Afghanistan in what was belatedly acknowledged to be a friendly fire incident, became an instant American hero. President Bush lauded him as "an inspiration on and off the football field." As it turns out, Tillman was a bit more of an inspiration than Mr. Bush bargained for.

As reported recently in the San Francisco Chronicle, Tillman was very much his own man, for instance steadfastly refusing to become a poster boy for the U.S. military. And there's more: Tillman apparently viewed the U.S. invasion of Iraq as illegal; he had little use for George Bush; and he was an admirer of the leftist author Noam Chomsky, whom he hoped to meet when he returned home.

Shrill voices on the right immediately denounced the Chronicle article as liberal propaganda. Just one problem: a primary source was Tillman’s own mother, Mary Tillman.

Tillman’s parents are furious at the Pentagon for hiding from them the truth of their son's death and none too pleased with Mr. Bush for brandishing him as a trophy to prop up his own sagging credibility.

"They wanted to use him for their own purposes", says Mary Tillman. "They needed something that looked good, and it was appalling that they would use him like that."

Pat Tillman was a scholar, an athlete, a soldier, a man. Though deeply troubled by the current administration's policies he felt duty-bound to serve his country even unto death. Unlike Dick Cheney, he claimed no "other priorities." Unlike George Bush, he expressed no desire to remain out of harm's way. Unlike Donald Rumsfeld, he saw the "untidiness" of war firsthand.

Like all young men, Pat Tillman was a work in progress. But he fought and he died a man in full.

We can only hope that this nation's leaders can summon the character to do justice to his courage. We can only hope.

•October 27, 2005| 12:55 pm EST

Bloggers are furiously publishing their opinions on Mier's decision to bow out.  Here's what our viewers are saying about Harriet Miers.

It was only a matter of time before Miers withdrew her nomination.  There was no getting around the 1989 survey she filled out in Texas which clearly stated her position on abortion.  The fact is, Americans are not about to give up any of their liberties.
--Susan, Camden, NJ

No big surprise here.  Bush is too stubborn to pull her out, so he "asked" her to withdraw. Once again this administration reveals the truth. She is not qualified and they should never have nominated her in the first place.
--Mary, Montgomery, IL

It’s sad to see Miers go before having a fair panel hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. What is this country coming to when we start bullying opinions so much so that potential leaders aren't given a chance to be heard?
--Norm, Pittsburgh, PA

•October 26, 2005| 1:35 pm EST

The World Series has baseball fans everywhere losing sleep -- literally!

You know the song, ‘Take me out to the ball game.’ Buy me some peanuts and Cracker Jack. I don't care if I ever get back.  Well, for those watching game three of the World Series last night, they almost didn't get back - home, that is, or to sleep. 

When the game finally ended, the clock at Minute Maid Park in Houston read 1:10 am, after 2 am on the east coast.  At five hours and 41 minutes, it was the longest World Series game in history by time.  And by innings, it matched the Boston--Brooklyn marathon game back in 1916 as the longest game ever.

At the five hour mark, with the witching hour long since past, do you even care who won?  Does anybody?  Maybe not even the players did, at that point.

Well, it was the Chicago White Sox that finally put the Houston Astros - and every baseball fan in America - out of their misery in the 14th inning to win the game and lead the series, three games to none. 

Both sides burned through their pitching staffs.  Both sides were exhausted.  Even the home-town crowd looked like they were busy chopping Z's. 

I’m a Boston Red Sox fan, so my glory day was last year, when they won their first world series in 86 years.  Now it looks like it's the White Sox's turn.  Good for them.

For the rest of us, there's always next year.  And the year after that.

But to whichever team wins this year - if you play a game into the wee hours again, we will be watching and cheering you on -- from bed.  Just remember to turn the stadium lights out.

•October 11, 2005| 2:40 pm EST

Could Las Vegas-style gambling boost the economy in New Orleans?  That’s just one of the topics we covered yesterday right here on Connected. It’s prompted many of you to email us about Mayor Ray Nagin's new casino proposal as a way to revitalize the city.

I am not sure what will be next for government agencies to compromise to make a buck in tax revenue. It seems to me that most of the money spent at casinos is coming out of the pockets of the local residents anyway.
--Rich, McKinney, TX

Another place for kids to booze it up in New Orleans!  That’s just what casinos will bring to the Big Easy.  Isn’t there anything else the city can use without compromising their integrity?
--Reno, Miami, FL

As a frequent visitor to Atlantic city over the years I have seen a vast improvement to the entire city area. An increase in jobs and an influx of money to the area has benefited a large area of central coastal New Jersey.
--Tom, Palm Coast, FL

Approximately 50-thousand people are employed by Atlantic City casinos, of all nationalities. Casinos here have offered innumerable opportunities. That does not include the millions of business done by suppliers.
--Sharon. Egg Harbor Township, NJ

•October 10, 2005| 1:12 pm EST

There’s been mixed reaction to the president's choice to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.  We've also received emails as to whether Harriet Miers is qualified to be on the Supreme Court.

I commend President Bush for nominating Harriet Miers to the U.S.  Supreme Court. I find her refreshing because she is a woman, and she has a variety of experiences not limited to the judicial realm.
--Constance

Our own former chief justice never ruled as a judge and he did a wonderful job.  It’s time for a more bi-partisan outlook when it comes to important decisions in this country. If the Democrats were in power they would want the same courtesy.
--Lois, Newark, Delaware

The bottom line is "W" said that he was loyal to his friends. The fact that Mr. Bush now wants to reward Miers, by giving her a life time job on the Supreme Court, proves he is 'loyal to his friends' even at the expense of the American people.
--Wilbert, Pittsburgh, PA

I have not heard one person say that Miers is qualified. How can we have someone who is not qualified go the Supreme Court? Because she was the personal lawyer of the president?  It makes no sense. This is also a sign of arrogance.
--Bernie, New Jersey

•October 6, 2005| 3:02 pm EST

We reported on the Supreme Court taking up the case of Oregon's Physician Assisted Suicide Law. It's the first high profile case to come before the brand new Chief Justice John Roberts.

Your emails:

The only death with dignity that truly exists is that where nature takes your life and not pills. The administration of pills to put someone out of their misery has a great deal of potential for abuse.
--Luanne, Pennsylvania

Why do we in the West seem to have such a dread of death? It’s just a natural part of life! I think it's going to be exciting to see what it's like on the other side. If we had a healthier attitude, death with dignity might not be a legal issue."
--Marybeth, Lincoln City, Oregon

If these are people who are sick and in so much pain.... that they would ask for a peaceful death- then grant them that one last wish.  The voters already spoke. The Supreme Court should stay out of it.
--Bob, Washington, DC   

•September 28, 2005|2:44 p.m. EST

Schools are back open today in Georgia- for the first time this week. The governor urged the schools to close for two days- to conserve fuel. We discussed it on the show yesterday, and are getting your reactions today.

No, it was not appropriate, nor was it a well thought out move, to close the schools! I feel sure that lost income from citizens that had to take off to stay with their children will more than off set any savings.
--Paula

What kind of message we are sending to our children by shutting down our schools to save on gas?  I would rather children be educated on environmental conservation, than to see the SUV's around town.
--Deborah

Who's to blame for the lack of response after Hurricane Katrina?
  
The mayor of New Orleans and the governor of Louisiana should all share the blame equally with Mr. Brown. What is missing here is that most of the blame should be placed on the hurricane itself.
--Carlton

All levels of government in the response to the disaster in Louisiana are at fault and responsible. The politicians are leading the charge on a federal level but down-playing what happened at a state and local level.
--Lou, Dallas, TX

•September 26, 2005|2:53 p.m. EST

Yesterday on "Connected" we discussed the role of the military in disaster relief- and this topic has prompted many of you to write in.

Our military is designed to protect us from outside enemies, but in these perilous times people do not trust leaders or bureaucrats. I have seen the hopeful looks on people's faces when the cavalry arrives."
--Sandra, Punta Gorda, Florida

The military needs to be available to play a role in any domestic disaster. They are the only agency with the resources to accomplish some of the tasks.
--Bill

The military will do the job they are trained to do but, it was a hurricane and that's not the military's job.
--Rich, McKinney, TX

•September 22, 2005|4:30 p.m. EST

Many of you are becoming citizen journalists for Hurricane Rita on www.cj.msnbc.com. Check out some of the submissions explaining what people are doing to prepare for the hurricane.

Katrina was an eye opener. My wife and I have an 8 month old baby and she is more important than the house. We expect to be out of houston by friday morning at the latest.
--Tom, Houston, TX

My family and I are not leaving even though we're in the cone of land that Rita may hit. What happened in Louisiana is still fresh in people's minds, but people here take pride in their homes and aren't going to leave willingly.
--Susan, Port Arthur, TX

It's amazing to me how a city as big as Houston can run short on normal supplies during hurricane season. You can't find water, batteries, flashlights, plywood, anything! We might as well evacuate since we can't get supplies to wait the storm out!
--Jessica, Houston, TX

I attend college in New Orleans at Xavier University. Now, I have to face this hurricane too. My family and I have decided to stay because my parents have faced Hurricane Alicia in the '80s and don't plan on leaving.
--Stephanie, League City, TX
  
Some people here are in the early stages of panic. Kerosene and camping fuel, batteries and especially water are flying off the shelves. Lines are beginning to form at the gas pumps with some having to wait in line for in excess of 30 minutes.
--Glenda, Lufkin, TX

•September 16 2005| 1:09 p.m. EST

President Bush's speech last night has sparked a big response from many people, including you. People from both sides have been emailing "Connected."

This speech was more about politics than empathy. No amount of photo-ops or speeches are going to replace the images of fellow Americans dying of thirst in the streets of New Orleans five days after the hurricane.
--T, Tulsa, Oklahoma

It is wonderful that the president is helping the victims of this tragedy, however, such actions are appropriate of any leader given the circumstances. Most troubling is that Bush did not come forward in the immediate hours.
--Anthony, Prescott, AZ

Would someone give President Bush a break? On his watch, he has dealt with two of the worst catastrophic disasters in our history. He is only one person, and in addition to the disasters, he also must run this country.
--Karen

The power and history of New Orleans proves that the city and the gulf have a way about it. I thought Mr. Bush did hit the 'second line'-and the meter seemed on target.
--R, Seattle, WA

•September 15, 2005| 1:55 p.m. EST

Our viewers are eager to discuss several issues...

On the Pledge of Allegiance being ruled unconstitutional:

Originally our 'Pledge of Allegiance' honored our country and flag, which everyone can agree, and embrace. In 1954 politicians made it into a controversial forced religious experience. Put it back to normal.
--Ted, Brandenton, Florida

On Roberts and the confirmation hearings:

Democrats and republicans alike, in the Senate and the judiciary committee must take more time to look into Mr. Roberts. This is a very, very important position in the government.
--Rikki, Clarksburg, West Virginia

I for one am happy to see that Roberts isn't giving out his personal views on different cases. Had he done so, he would be inundated with paperwork from thousands of people looking for favors.
--William, Morgantown, West Virginia

Regarding placing blame after Hurricane Katrina:

It seems to me that Mayor Nagin should be in jail for negligence many times over! He seems to be blaming everyone in sight, when his city did the poorest job of all!
--Daren, Valdez, Alaska

•September 14, 2005| 2:10 p.m. EST

'Connected' was pre-empted with breaking news these past few days but we continue to receive your emails. Ron Reagan and Monica Crowley will be back together tomorrow for both shows. These are some of your opinions about the confirmation hearings for Judge John Roberts:

I see nothing in Roberts that would qualify him to be elevated to that lofty position over, say, Thomas or Scalia.
--Mary, South Carolina

I think Roberts should be confirmed without any delay. I usually am against the White House 100 percent of the time, but this time Bush did a good job.
--Craig

John Roberts made it clear that he believes there is constitutional protection of a right to privacy. I believe Roberts will not seek to reverse or erase Roe v. Wade.
--Carolyn, Florida

You've also been e-mailing us about just who's responsible for the government's response to Hurricane Katrina victims in the Gulf coast:

We owe it to them as Americans to show them that we do care and they do matter. We do that by asking for answers, and by suggesting that those who were responsible be held responsible."
--Michelle

I would think that his (New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin) abject failure to react quicker and according to already published New Orleans city evacuations protocols and use the city school buses to get the people out requires an arrest and charges.
--Ray Coleman, Tampa, Florida

•September 7, 2005| 1:49 p.m. EST

Many of you have written to 'Connected' with strong feelings about relief and recovery efforts in the Gulf states.  These are some of your emails:

I was a victim of Hurricane Andrew in Homestead , Florida in ’92. It is easy for those who haven't been affected or directly involved in such a disaster to sit back and criticize our leaders, and it is human instinct for those who have been affected to immediately expect results, as I did after Andrew. As time passed after the initial stage of shock, we were able to understand and appreciate the support and time it took to put such a massive recovery response team together.  
--Byron Sackett

The major blame in this disaster falls on the local authorities in city government and if anyone needs to be removed from office like the media suggests it is only on the local level.
--Rich Kaminski

I don't doubt President Bush's sincerity, however, having him head the investigation into the government's slow response to the disaster is like asking Pete Rose to lead the investigation into whether or not he bet on baseball. An independent investigation is needed... that's a no-brainer.
--Jeff Edwards

As the horror of Katrina’s aftermath continues to unfold, many nations; hundreds of organizations and corporations; and countless individuals are making significant contributions to ongoing relief efforts.  But those who have the most to give – the oil companies – are content to price-gouge the entire nation and rake in obscene profits while turning a blind eye to this apocalyptic disaster.  A few have made token contributions, but we haven’t seen a single oil company CEO come forward with a plan to assist the Gulf Coast victims in any meaningful way.
--George Stojanowski, Sierra Vista, AZ

It's a sad day when people argue over who's to blame and trivialities like semantics (refugee versus evacuee) when everyone should be focused right now on rescue and support of the affected people and animals. It's so very sad that many Americans need help and everybody takes precious time out to bash each other over the head instead of helping in the rescue effort.
--Christine Holleyman

With the disgraceful lack of response by the government during Hurricane Katrina, I find it inappropriate that the president has decided to launch an investigation that he will oversee. I believe we need something in the vein of the 9/11 Commission that will operate independently of both Congress and the White House.
--Tim, Pheonix

•September 2, 2005| 1 p.m. EST

The shock and fear citizens experienced during Hurricane Katrina and in the hours after have given way to anger.  On the faces of those stranded in the Big Easy, and in the emails we receive daily--countless emails--one resounding question:  Why?

For example, why were thousands sent to the Superdome when there was no way to feed them or provide water there?  And why can we airlift supplies to countries in Africa and Asia, dropping cases of food, medicine, and water in Indonesia for tsunami relief, but we have been unable to do so in the United States?

I don't know the answers to those questions, nor am I versed in the logistics of relief efforts.  But I, too, have questions.

When Terri Schiavo got caught in the center of her own storm, there seemed to be no member of Congress who wasn't vying for camera time to argue for the right to live or the right to die with dignity.  Dick Durbin's comments comparing the conditions at Guantanamo Bay to Nazi camps drew calls for resignation, shouts and red faced diatribe on the Senate floor.

Congress worked late into the night--set up cots even--to fight over the nomination of Justice Priscilla Owens.

But for the thousands of people dying in the streets of New Orleans the elected officials have been kind enough to cut their vacations one day short.

This is not a blue or red thing.  It's not a Evangelicals versus liberals thing.  It's a life and death thing.  It's the reason we pay taxes.

If anything good comes from this terrible natural disaster, and something good always does, I hope it will be a catalyst for all Americans to examine the system, to demand more from those who we pay to be there in times like this.  Some things are not about politics, they are just about people.

--Tony Maciulis, Connected Coast to Coast producer

•September 1, 2005| 3:25 p.m. EST

Many of you are turning to the Internet to share your thoughts about Hurricane Katrina. These are some of your emails:

Strings  of inexpensive red Mardi Gras beads could be sold on card tables in front of supermarkets or at convenience stores, for two or three dollars apiece with 100 percent of the profits going to the American Red Cross.
--Patrick

Katrina is a life-changing event for the survivors and for those of us who can only watch in horror and fascination as events unfold. Our hearts go out to those who are seeking loved ones.
--Naomi and Bernie, Roberta, GA

I watched your great coverage tonight and was moved to tears. It is the first time that I have felt so helpless and sad since 9/11.
--Eddie, Cathedral City, CA

I was suddenly struck by the realization of how lucky I am to be blessed with my family's health and a roof over my head. Somehow, my daily frustration at $3.70 gas prices seems embarrassingly trivial.
--Melissa

What has just made me 'madder than all-get-out' is the looting. This type of behavior being shown to the world is not the best advertising for people to dig deep in their pockets and send any type of relief to this state.
--Pam, Sebring, FL

Under no circumstances can looting be condoned.  To hear journalists say they are only doing it for survival is the poorest comment I have ever heard!
--Beverly, New Port Richey, FL

I have been praying for everyone in all of the affected areas and pray that flooding in Louisiana can be remedied quickly. My fear is illness and death for these people that stayed behind.
--Anne, Marysville, OH

•August 26, 2005| 2:08 p.m. EST

The ball player, the bat boy and the bet (Ron Reagan)

When Baltimore Orioles first baseman Rafael Palmiero tested positive for steroids recently, many people were shocked. When his punishment turned out to be nothing more than a ten day suspension, plenty more people were outraged. This is a guy who had sworn an oath before congress then wagged his finger at the assembled senators as he vehemently denied ever, ever using performance enhancing drugs.

There’s a word for that: perjury- a pretty serious offense. Add that to the steroid use and giving the guy a week off didn't really seem to be a punishment that fit the crime.

Well, if that ticked you off, you're gonna love this little item: a Florida marlins batboy has been suspended from the team for six days... for drinking milk.

Ok, it's a bit more complicated than that, but just a bit. The batboy - unidentified because he's underage- accepted a bet with L.A. Dodgers pitcher Brad Penny, himself a former marlin.

Penny told the boy he'd pay him 500 dollars for downing a gallon of milk in under an hour without throwing up.

The batboy drank the milk, didn't throw up, but because he took more than an hour didn't collect the money. He did, however, earn himself that suspension.

“It's kind of ridiculous that you get a ten day suspension for steroids and a six game suspension for milk."

Penny, who might rightly be chastised for luring a child into doing something unhealthy, nevertheless put things in proper perspective, telling the Miami herald, "It’s kind of ridiculous that you get a ten day suspension for steroids and a six game suspension for milk."

Ridiculous is putting it politely. What’s next, a 20 day suspension for eating your vegetables?

Is it any wonder people don't think baseball has taken its steroid problem seriously?

•August 25, 2005 | 2:08 p.m. EST

Finding wild on the Internet (Ron Reagan)

Internet shoppers know: whatever you want, you can find it on the web. Want a new car? Just go online. Looking for a celebrity's home address? Yeah, it's there. How about a date for Saturday night? The Internet is your matchmaker.

Unfortunately, some people have itches that oughtn't to be scratched. For various reason - some good, many not- a lot of folks are attracted to exotic wildlife and products derived from these creatures and they are finding them on the web...

According to the International Fund for Animal Welfare, "The trade, both legal and illegal, in live and dead animals- including body parts- is increasing and the Internet is coming to play a central role in the activities of illegal traders."

We're not talking about shopping for a new puppy here and, according to experts; the trade in endangered species and products is now a multi-billion dollar industry.

Along with elephant foot ashtrays, ivory sculptures and skins of various rare species fashioned into cowboy boots and overcoats, there are the live animals.

Baby chimpanzees can be purchased for 60 to 65 thousand dollars. A seven-year-old gorilla has been put up for sale in Britain; its owner is moving - guess the new digs aren't suitable for a large primate.

Then there's the two year old giraffe, a steal at 15 thousand dollars. Got room for a giraffe at your house? Didn't think so.

Let's be clear. Unless you're a wildlife biologist with an accredited animal sanctuary, you have no business keeping wild, exotic, endangered species at home. Yes, those tiger cubs are cute. But then they grow up, you can't handle them anymore and bad things tend to happen. Not so cute.

But, you say, I love wild animals. So do I. I love them wild, I love them free. If you need to commune with animals, more power to you. But exercise some common sense. Might I suggest a dog or cat from a shelter that needs and will thrive in your home?

•August 24, 2005 | 2:03 p.m. EST

Another piece of good news is “flying” out of Iraq (Monica Crowley)

Last week, the international monetary fund finished an evaluation of the Iraqi economy- and said that despite the violence and the need for more reforms, the economy was stable- and growing.

One sure sign of Iraqi economic growth: there are now two Iraq-based international airline carriers operating out of Baghdad.

One of them is a small start-up passenger service called Ishtar airlines. Before you think it was named after the 1987 Hollywood box office flop starring Warren Beatty, Ishtar was actually named for an ancient Babylonian goddess.

The airline operates two Boeing aircraft that fly three times a week between Baghdad and Dubai in the United Arab Emirates.

A round-trip ticket will set you back six-hundred bucks- mostly because fuel is so expensive. It’s that sixty dollars per barrel oil, you know.

Talk to OPEC about that. In the meantime, Ishtar has some foreign competition- airlines called Orbit and Jupiter. But Ishtar is an airline with a dream- with plans to expand, opening offices soon in Cairo and Istanbul.

One thing that has thrown a monkey wrench into their plans: sandstorms, which have forced Ishtar to cancel several flights this summer. But the folks over at Ishtar are a hardy bunch- and they are determined to make this airline work.

That’s the new Iraqi entrepreneurial spirit.

Soon Ishtar will be flying from Baghdad to points all over the Middle East.

Maybe someday, you'll even be able to take Ishtar to Hawaii. In any case, Ishtar air is already more successful than the Hollywood movie of the same name. And that's saying something.

•August 23, 2005 | 2:06 p.m. EST

Television host Pat Robertson essentially called for the assassination of the president of Venezuela. The Venezuela vice president said that kind of talk is "criminal."  We've been hearing from you.

Your e-mails:

The real threat to America is right wing religious zealots like Robertson. Wake up America.
--Al, Naples, Florida

Funny thing about religious extremists- it doesn't matter if they are wearing a head scarf or a Brooks Brothers suit, they are dangerous. Men of God like Pat Robertson should be preaching peace and love- not assassination.
--Steve

Pat Robertson is making America look like the people we are fighting in the war on terror. We are not a nation of religious extremists, and Robertson needs to stop hate messages made falsely in the name of God.
--Jeff, Ohio

Maybe Pat Robertson has read more than just the Bible, like books on strategy and tactics. He has a good point that I am sure our leaders have hopefully considered.
--Don

•August 22, 2005 | 1:15 p.m. EST

Are these beer makers drunk? (Ron Reagan)

One hundred bottles of beer on the wall? Well, ok - but, no, don't start singing the song, please! How about a single bottle of beer for 100 dollars? Surely I must be kidding you. Nope.

Sam Adams, makers of perfectly respectable and only moderately pricey lagers and ales, has once again introduced "utopias,” twenty-four ounce bottles of suds that will set you back a C-note.

Only eight-thousand bottles have been brewed, indicating that the Sam Adams folks haven't completely lost touch with reality.

Much of the beer is apparently being consumed in single shots poured out in various drinking establishments for up to 12 dollars per shots of beer? No, no, no, shots are what you drink with your beer. And twelve bucks for a thimbleful of brewski? Oh, c'mon!

Now, it's worth mentioning that utopias is billed as the world's strongest beer – 25 percent alcohol instead of the usual 5 percent or so. That’s more like cognac. If you're seeking that sort of buzz, might I suggest... cognac?

Of course, suckers - and swillers - are born every minute. "It’s a special occasion beverage,” enthused one possibly inebriated customer. Yes, those oh-so-special occasions that call for drunkenly wasting your money. Hey, if you've got a hundred dollars to burn, be my guest - roll a bill into a tube and light 'er up! If you want to throw your money in the street, there are plenty available. Just wad up ol’ Ben Franklin and toss him into traffic!

Beer has always been the drink of the common man and the common man doesn't commonly drop half a week's wages on one bottle of beer. There’s really no excuse for 100-dollar beer. I don't care if the bottle comes with an Elvis Presley autograph - a new one. I don't care if the beer was brewed in Heidi Klum's bathtub. It’s just wrong.

•August 19, 2005 | 2:40 p.m. EST

Many of you have been writing in with reaction to the dramatic events in Gaza this week - as Israeli settlers are ordered to leave their homes.

Your e-mails:

Hopefully, the pullout of Gaza by Israel is a first step towards peace in the Middle East.
--Erik, Baltimore, Maryland

The Israelis should be praised for disengagement of Gaza. What have the Palestinians done to try and make peace besides terror bombings and declining the Camp David accords? Nothing!
--Christian, Sacramento, California

I feel for those who had their land taken away to form the settlements in Gaza and the West Bank. In today's world nobody has the moral right to take another persons land in the name of their religion or by conquest.
--Jeff, Columbus

The pullout in Gaza seems small compensation for years of brutal occupation of the Palestinians. The 50-year takeover of land by Israel and its ensuing destruction of Palestinian lives and land were the original seeds of terrorism.
--Charlotte

Our viewers continue to respond to the debate surrounding Cindy Sheehan's actions. 

Your e-mails:

Cindy Sheehan's son died for our rights.  I believe now we must focus on the Americans who are in Iraq, fighting for our freedom.  We thank them everyday for everything they are doing for us.
--Bonnie

I don't think anything she has done demoralizes the troops in Iraq.  Ms. Sheehan is asking for an explanation from her president.  She is not a shill for the radical left.  That is the propaganda fo the fearful radical right.
--A.R.

This lady is disrespecting her son and everything he believed in.  He volunteered to serve his country- it was his choice, not hers.  For her to use her son's death to promot her own political agenda is sickening.
--Mark

Many seem to be missing the point- that Cindy Sheehan is asking the president to answer her questions as a citizen, as well as a mom.

I will stand at vigil, as a citizen with the same questions.  Wake up America.
--Sally, Saco, Maine

•August 18, 2005 | 2:35 p.m. ET

Underestimated summer reading (Monica Crowley)

President Bush certainly isn't the first conservative Republican to face jokes about his intelligence.

Ever since he came on the political scene... Mr. Bush has been the target of those who find it easier to attack his smarts, than his ideas.

But somehow his detractors always seem to miss the real George Bush. And they lose elections for underestimating him---his political skills and his intelligence.

Just take a gander at the president's summer reading list.

In five weeks-- he'll plow through three pretty hefty books.

The first is "Salt: A World History."

Don’t let the title throw you: there was a time when salt was as valuable as oil, giving rise to climactic battles and international intrigue.

The president is also reading "Alexander II"-- the last great tsar.

Alexander was one of the first world leaders to declare war on terrorists-- his were Russians, angry at his reforms.

And finally on the president's bed stand is "The Great Influenza"....the epic story of the deadliest plague in history. The title of that one, pretty self-explanatory.

So, all in all... a pretty sophisticated reading list if you ask me... much more sophisticated than my own beach reading. So, opponents of the president: go ahead and continue to underestimate him.  Because while you are off doing that, he'll be busy reading important historical works and running the war on terror.

•August 17, 2005 | 2:35 p.m. ET

Pawn or patriot?
Many of you have e-mailed us your thoughts on Cindy Sheehan- the fallen Iraqi soldier's mother who has become- in many ways, the new face of the anti-Iraq movement.

Your e-mails:

Cindy Sheehan has used her son's sacrifice to launch a political attack on the president, whom she disagreed with before her son's death. The left-wing hangers care only about promoting their political agenda & nothing for Casey Sheehan."
--Arthur, Sonoma, California

Mrs. Sheehan's son volunteered thinking he was doing it for a noble cause. He was lied to and died for a pack of lies. The mother just wants to know what is this noble cause Bush is saying troops are dying for? That's all.
--Laurent, Rockville, MD

Cindy has a right to grieve her son anyway she wants. Even if he volunteered that does not automatically turn off a mother's love for her child. Cut the woman some slack and stop trying to make something political out of it all.
--Wendy 

Cindy Sheehan has completely ignored her own son's mindful sacrifice and allowed herself to become a pawn in a sleazy game for political gain. Not her's of course, unless she does run for Congress!
--Mike

• August 17, 2005 | 2:35 p.m. ET

Every dog has his day (Ron Reagan)

As I know perfectly well, not all of us can be stunningly photogenic. Some are a bit luckier in the looks department than others.

One look at Sam, a 14 year old Chinese crested - that's a largely hairless variety of dog - might lead you to conclude that he's one of the unfortunate ones. Getting on in years, he's covered in warts, moles and blackheads. One eye is discolored by cataracts; the other is milky white. He’s virtually blind. He suffers from heart problems, kidney disease and, oh yes, there's the little matter of his hernia. And it's safe to say that, for Sam, every day is a bad hair day. Most people would agree; he's one homely dog.

But beauty is in the eye of the beholder and maybe every dog does have his day. Sam, I suspect, considers himself, if not pretty, at least pretty lucky. When Sam’s previous owner needed to find him a new home, there were at first no takers.

You don't really have to ask why. Then, along came Susie Lockheed.

Susie was initially reluctant to adopt Sam. "He didn't look so good then," she says, "but he's looking worse now."

Yet something about Sam’s personality won her over. Says Susie, "There's something quite noble about Sam.

Even though he's unattractive, he expects to be treated like royalty." so Susie plays along, smothering him in kisses, feeding him treats and letting him sleep in her bed at night.

And Sam has become something better than royalty. He’s a champion. For the third year running, Sam has won the title of "world's ugliest dog." But let's not tell him what his trophy signifies. Let’s just tell him he's a winner. Because he is. 

• August 17, 2005 | 1:32 p.m. ET

A new kind of triple threat (Monica Crowley)

Speaking of cheating… in London, Melvyn Reed had triple bypass surgery- when he awoke after the operation; he was confronted with something that nearly made his heart stop.

It was a different kind of triple threat.

Three women… who thought they were his one and only… all together at the same time.

Turns out he was living as a double bigamist.      

Police say he was married to one of the women back in the sixties… and then the other two more recently. None of his wives knew the others existed- until they all ran into each other outside the hospital- on their way to visit him in the recovery room.

Reed is now out of the hospital- but he may be wishing he were back in.

That’s because he’s now charge with bigamy after turning himself in to police.  And that’s nothing compared to what the wives probably have in store for him.

• August 10, 2005 | 1:47 p.m. ET

A night at the ball park complete with peanuts, cracker jack- and a flying fan (Monica Crowley)

Ah, summertime. A time for lazy days at the beach, reading escapist fare, sipping lemonade, and maybe catching a ballgame or two. There’s nothing better on a summer afternoon or evening than going to a major-league park, buying some of those 12 dollar hot dogs and watching the big boys do their thing.      

You expect to see base hits, stolen bases, fly balls, daring plays, and if you're lucky, home runs.  And if you're really lucky, a grand slam. Balls flying through the air-- you expect. You do not expect to see fans flying through the air.

And yet, that's exactly what happened last night at Yankee stadium.

Scott Harper was at the game with three friends, watching shortstop Derek Jeter bunt, and musing about the mesh netting above the lower seats-- the seats right beneath them. Harper and his pals were trying to guess how much weight that netting could hold-- could it hold one person, say, if someone jumped on it? In his infinite wisdom, Harper decided to test it out. He climbed over the railing and jumped. He tore a gash through the netting but did not fall through, so I guess he answered his own question about how much weight it could hold!

Yankees fans- being Yankees fans- started yelling at him, calling him every name in the book- as only Yankees fans can do.  I’m sure they weren't very pleasant names.

Well, police and stadium security weren't too pleased with him either. He was promptly placed under arrest. 

What was this guy thinking? Obviously, not a lot. 

People do stupid things- this guy: case in point.  The lesson here is to not just look before you leap, but think before you leap. And then don't.

Buy a twelve dollar hot dog instead.

• August 10, 2005 | 1:18 p.m. ET

What happened to summer vacation?

Many of you have weighed in on our discussion about school and summer vacation.  Many school districts are opting for start dates in mid-August. Some parents don't want their kids to head back to school until after Labor Day, and others say that it's absolutely neccessary.

Your e-mails:

I am no fan of the standardized tests or No Child Left Behind. But, we are falling behind many other countries in education. If we want to compete in this new global economy, we must do a better job of preparing the next generation for success.
--Dierdre, Seattle, WA

With poor math and science test scores in the U.S. and the strong focus on good education in other countries, we are doing our country a real disservice by continuing on the traditional school calendar.
--Dianne, Burlington, North Carolina

My children will go back to school on Friday.  I think this is crazy. Summer vacation is from the end of June until after Labor Day.  I'm all for testing but this is ridiculous.  Even the teachers don't agree. Let the children have a normal summer!
--Caroline, Florida

• August 10, 2005 | 12:28 p.m. ET

The 'other' voices (Monica Crowley)

Whoever said there are always two sides to every story-- must not have been talking about national coverage of the war in Iraq.

Turn on the television these days-- and you might get the impression that "everyone" in America is against what our military is doing over there.

Whether it’s the mom who lost a son in Iraq... now camped out in Crawford Texas... demanding a meeting with President Bush or the group of so-called "raging grannies" who are joining in protest-- calling for an immediate pull-out from Iraq.

The national media is quick to show us these colorful examples of people protesting the war.

Now don’t misunderstand-- I fully support the right of these Americans to speak out.

After all, it’s that kind of freedom we're fighting for in Iraq and Afghanistan.

But maybe it’s time someone stood up for the "other" voices out there-- the people who aren't causing a media spectacle in Crawford, or dressed up with colorful costumes and signs.

You’ll have to read those voices in print-- in America’s hometown newspapers.

Like the Western Star in Warren County, Ohio where Carole Hoffman’s son Justin was killed in Iraq.

She told the paper’s reporter, "Justin believed in what he was doing.  Justin gave his life for the Iraqi people. He knew that was the price he might have to pay, and I stand behind him 100 percent."

Or the Columbia Daily Tribune in Missouri... where Debra Strang is quoted as saying, "As a Christian, I understand the need to help people who are suffering.  I have not changed my mind in regard to the war."

Her best friend lost a loved one in the war.

• August 4, 2005 | 1: 59 p.m. ET

Presidential science (Ron Reagan)

George W. Bush has once again dipped a reluctant toe into the mysteriously controversial topic of Darwinian Evolution. 

Now, Mr. Bush may be many things- President of the United States; Leader of the Free World; Cheerleader-in-Chief for the Global Struggle against Violent Extremism- but Monday’s comments make it abundantly clear why no one has ever accused Mr. Bush of being a scientist, rocket or otherwise.

Mr. Bush offered the opinion that “intelligent design,” a religiously inspired notion unsupported by science, should be taught in public school science classes alongside Darwin’s Theory of Evolution- an actual scientific theory. 

Said Mr. Bush, “I think that part of education is to expose people to different schools of " Well then, he’ll no doubt support teaching American schools kids that Osama bin Laden is a misunderstood Arab patriot. 

Mr. Bush went on to say, “you’re asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas.  The answer is, “Yes.”

No, I’m asking why a man with your education advantages and access to information, a man who claims to be interested in promoting academic excellence, would support introducing twaddle into our public school’s science curriculum.   

The National Academy of Sciences put it succinctly saying, “The claim that equity demands balanced treatment of evolutionary theory and special creation in science classrooms reflects a misunderstanding of what science is and how it is conducted…creationism, intelligent design, and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origins of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science.” 

Question is, will that idea be one to which our President is willing to expose himself?

E-mail

• August 4, 2005 | 10: 32 a.m. ET

The best view on Earth? (Ron Reagan)

The best view on Earth isn’t on terra firma.  It belongs, of course, to those lucky astronauts orbiting above our planet aboard the space station and shuttle, Discovery.

Two-hundred-twenty miles up, zipping along at the thousands of miles per hours, the astronauts enjoy a perspective on our world few of us can even imagine:  rivers winding across deserts to the sea appear as slender threads; mountain ranges barely wrinkle the earth’s surface; the cloud tops are far below. 

Only the largest human works- the Great Wall of China, for instance- are visible from space, but according to Discovery Commander, Eileen Collins, other evidence of our impact on the Earth is sadly apparent.

“Sometimes you can see how there is erosion,” says Collins, “and you can see how there is deforestation.  It’s very widespread in some parts of the world.”

We tend to think of the Earth as vast and formidable, somehow immune to our depredations.  From space, it is the fragility of our planet that strikes home.  Says Collins, “The atmosphere looks like an eggshell on an egg, it’s so very thin.  We don’t have much air; we need to protect what we have.”

She adds, “We would like to see, from the astronaut’s point of view, people take good care of the Earth and replace the resources that have been used.”

We rightly honor our astronauts for their courage, for their willingness to risk their lives for our benefit.  Now it’s time to tear ourselves away from the pretty pictures, from the gee-whiz moments.  Now it’s time to listen.

E-mail

• August 3, 2005 | 1:59 p.m. ET

The Hillary battle begins

With exactly one thousand, one hundred and eighty seven days until the next presidential election, several grass roots organizations are already picking their candidates for office.  Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, seems to be the main focus and many are rallying around her.

“Connected” asks its viewers:  Will Hillary Clinton be a good choice to become the next president?

Your e-mails: 

She is not afraid to fight for traditional democratic beliefs, health care for all Americans, clean air, jobs, social security, a secure America that’s not done by invading a nation that had nothing to do with attacking us, having real relations with other countries in the world.
-- Ross Blake, Shelly, Minn.

It is time to get past Bill, Hill, & George.   Enough!   Give me another group of individuals, new ideas, and new faces. We have been wearing the same old cloths since the 60s. Bill, Hill, George, go away.   Give me new!
-- D. L. Graham

I believe Hillary really must put fear in the Republican Party for them to be on her all the time. She is strong, intelligent, has the correct issues in mind, she is articulating and has vision.
-- Bob Bogdal

Strong influential leaders that are female are immediately perceived as a threat to the established male bureaucracy. Any reference to her husband's past actions should be ignored. She must be taken at her word and record's performance.
-- John P. McNea III, University Hts., Ohio

I am a somewhat disillusioned Democrat and I do not want Hillary to run for President in 2008.   Why?   Because she won't win.   Not because she isn't qualified, but because she is a woman and this country is just not ready to have a woman at the helm, no matter how qualified she may be.
--Sue, Conn. 

• July 29, 2005 | 3:07 p.m. ET

Do people have the right to sue gun companies?

Many of you have been e-mailing "Connected" - reacting to yesterday's discussion on gun control.
The senate is about to pass a controversial bill that would shield the gun industry from certain criminal lawsuits.

Your e-mails:

The constitution does not guarantee our right to have
guns. It guarantees our right to arms.   So why does the NRA make the jump to almost all guns being ok---- in almost all cases?
--Rory, Minnesota

There needs to be some kind of protection against more
frivolous lawsuits.  If I stab someone to death will their family be able to sue the manufacturer?
--Gerry

The NRA says "nuisance lawsuits" will cripple the gun
industry.  Drug stores have to take measures to assure
that dangerous products are monitored.  Why do gun dealers have such an issue?
--Andrea, Florida

There 80 million Americans who own guns, and going
after manufacturers is just silly.  We already have laws.  How about if we just enforce them?
--Rick, Pennsylvania

• July 28, 2005 |5:40 p.m. ET

War and Sacrifice

It's a tough question-- how much are Americans willing to sacrifice here at home for the war in Iraq? We raised this issue on yesterday's second edition of 'Connected,' and we're hearing from you.

Your E-mails:

If the war in Iraq is wrong- then the soldiers fighting the war are wrong.  I cannot support the killing of innocent people even by 'well-meaning' soldiers who believe they are defending their country.
--BJ, Bradenton, Florida
As this war goes on,the quality of life for Americans and the freedoms we enjoyo are quickly fading.  If the cause was as worthy a cause as in World War II, this nation would be standing in line to serve.
--Joshua, New Port Richey, Florida

I have been in the Marine Corps for over two years and since the war began I don't think that America does support us.  We are doing the duty that is asked of us so Americans can sleep in peace at night.  I hope people realize that.
--S

The greatest measure of support is still for our citizens to find a recruiting office and join up.  But enlistments are down, which not only indicates a lack of support for the war but also that people believe others will do the fighting.
--Steve

July 26, 2005 |4:00 p.m. ET

France's self-esteem (Monica Crowley)

The French seem to find all kinds of interesting ways to fill their days: coddling the world's dictators, selling banned technologies to rogue regimes, and, of course, their favorite pastime: stabbing the United States in the back.

But when not doing any of those choice activities, the French are apparently doing something else they do best: admiring themselves!

According to a new poll, eight out of ten French people check their looks in the mirror at least once a day and say they like what they see. French men are a little more content than the women -- with 88 percent of them liking the way they look, compared to 73 percent of women.

French President Jacques Chirac is in this group, I'm sure, with the way he preens in front of the cameras, perfectly groomed, as he sticks it to the U.S. and makes fun of the British.

Only fifteen percent of the French polled are on a diet, and while forty-two percent said they wanted to lose weight, most of those said it was for health concerns and not because they felt they were too fat.

Of course not.

The French look in the mirror and see perfection staring back at them. Some might say that's healthy self-esteem. I say they're delusional. The French are still dining out on the empire they lost three-hundred years ago.

This Napoleonic arrogance has got to go.

The French certainly do like themselves -- which I guess is a good thing -- since very few others around the world feel the same way about them.

E-mail

July 26, 2005 |1:45 p.m. ET

The Federalist Society controversy

According to the e-mails sent to Connected- many of you are following one of our topics- the events surrounding Supreme Court Nominee John Roberts.  Some of you are keeping track of that "confusion" over the nominees reported ties to the "Federalist Society."

Your e-mails:

If the president feels Judge Roberts is a good choice, why not answer questions and provide documentation?  Their secretive attitude makes it look like there is something they are trying to hide.
--Renee, South Florida

I believe that Judge Roberts will be confirmed to the Supreme Court, and will be an important member of the bench.  I don't feel that he should have to answer questions about his personal viewpoints.
--Scott, Phoenix, Arizona

Judge Roberts isn't answering questions about belonging to the "Federalist Society," but according to reports, he wasn't just a member, he was on the steering committee.  That sounds like a member to me.
--Mary, Michigan

Judge John Roberts is the best choice for the highest court that has ever been brought up before the Senate.  I think that they should do the work of the people- vote on him for the Supreme Court.
--Joe

• July 25, 2005 |5:52 p.m. ET

A case for profiling (Monica Crowley)

Millions of commuters in the New York region headed in to work today to face another cold reality of the world we now live in: random bag checks. 

Nearly four years after the attacks that forever changed New York, the terror bombings in London have brought another level of scrutiny and security to our daily lives.

The intentions of the police are good -- and most New Yorkers are taking the whole thing in stride. But with 4.5 million people riding New York's subway every day alone you might compare this to looking for a needle in a haystack.

And to make their job even more difficult the authorities have their hands tied by the constraints of political correctness.  The police can't single out passengers based on their appearance they may only search in numerical order.  For example, every fifth or tenth person might be stopped and checked.

Racial profiling is out of the question.

But why?  We certainly know "who" wants to attack us -- Muslim extremists.  And while we should never settle on a single description of what a terrorist might look like, we certainly have a track record to work with.

Whether it's the faces of the men now wanted in the London attacks, the so-called shoe-bomber who tried to blow-up a passenger jet in mid-air, or the pictures of the hijackers who crashed the jets into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11th.

I'm not suggesting we should stop and search people based "only" on what they look like but it should be one of the tools available to police.  Shaking down a 70-year-old grandmother on New York's subway, just because she's the 10th person in line is a waste of precious time and resources.

Preventing innocent people from being blown-up is a bigger cause than political correctness, or protecting someone's feelings. After all, the terrorists aren't bound to these rules. Their targets can be anyone, regardless of who they might look like.

E-mail

• July 25, 2005 |1:45 p.m. ET

Justice John Roberts?

President Bush's nomination of John Roberts to the U.S. Supreme Court came as a surprise to both sides of the political spectrum. As a young judge, with a relatively small amount of high court experience, the president's pick to replace Justice Sandra Day O’Connor has been met with controversy.

“Connected” asks its viewers: Will Roberts be able to perform as a Supreme Court Justice?

Your E-mails:

Roberts doesn't need to answer questions about his personal opinions. They have nothing to do with the confirmation process. If most people knew how decisions were arrived at in the Supreme Court they would be appalled. A decision is merely a bargaining chip for the next decision. I vote for your thing this time you vote for my thing next time. Opinions don’t matter.
-- Richard Kaminski, McKinney, Tex.

John Roberts is a stealth conservative candidate.  He really shouldn’t be confirmed, but it really doesn’t matter much.  The court won’t dare overturn Roe v. Wade and our civil liberties will be eroded no matter who is nominated.
-- David Gonthreau

The democrats have gone on a fishing trip without any bate, since not even the Chief Justice could answer how he would vote on Roe vs. Wade.  What is it with democrats like Durbin; he does not even have a fishing pole on his fishing trip. This Judge, John G. Roberts is the best choice for the highest court in the land that has ever been brought up before the Senate.
-- Joe Aymond

If this man does not answer questions or produce documents he should go back where he came from, all bush has around him are dishonest thugs like Rove and we are sick of the lies coming out of Washington. We are very tired of bush flip-flopping and all their rhetoric.
-- Susan Fontenot, Houston, Tex.

• July 22, 2005 |5:55 p.m. ET

Even fruit isn't safe from new technology (Ron Reagan)

“Shall I eat a peach?” famously asked the poet, T.S. Elliott.  Well, sure.  Just don’t choke on that little sticker clinging to the fuzz!

You know the ones I’m talking about: those little plasticine ovals defacing our produce.  It used to be that enjoying a piece of fruit was a pretty straightforward affair.  You bought them, you washed them off; you were good to go.  Not anymore. 

Now, there’s the picking and the peeling and the hoping you don’t tear the skin which means you’ve got to eat it right away whether you wanted to or not or it’ll spoil.  Thank you agriculture industry.

First, you leech the taste out of our fruit by picking everything before it’s even near ripe; then you insult us with this.

Once upon a time, even supermarkets carried good produce.  Now, you can play stickball with the tomatoes.  And when’s the last time you found a luscious, juicy apricot at your local food depot.  Uh huh.   That’s what I thought.

Well, there’s some good news on the horizon.  Apparently, those annoying stickers will soon be a thing of the past.  But don’t start celebrating with a fruit salad just yet.  Here’s the bad news:

They’re being replaced by- get this- laser-etched tattoos.  No picking and peeling those puppies.  Before long, there’ll be bar codes and other cryptic numbers burned indelibly into our food.  Now doubt when you reach for a peach, it’ll be emblazoned with the word “peach”- just in case you forgot.  I know it’s a peach.  That why I bought it!

Message to the agri-corporations:  If I want tattoos, I’ll go to a biker convention and if you like bar codes so much, stamp them on your own … foreheads.

Meanwhile, I’ll see you at the Farmer’s Market.  I’ll be the guy hanging around the organic fruit stall, eating a peach the way nature intended. 

E-mail

• July 22, 2005 |2:29 p.m. ET

An update from our previous discussion about:
Searching – profiling or safety?

Your E-mails:

Random searches are just an exercise in public relations. Having fools make rules does not make me feel safer. We know what these guys look like, and 99.9% of them are guys. It is time for some rational profiling.
-- Kathleen

I have seen a great deal of coverage of the security measures being implemented in New York City.  I’ve seen no coverage concerning security measures implemented at Union Station and the Metro system in Washington, D.C. is there a news blackout on this issue or do we really believe terrorists wouldn’t dare strike our nation’s capitol?
-- Karl Waldbauer

Officials are stressing there will be no “profiling.” Why not? We’re so worried about hurting someone’s feelings that we’ll waste time and man power to search someone like me?  Let’s stop fooling around!
-- Betty Ann Snyder, New York City

While dogs and machine guns abound at Grand Central, the outlying stations in Brooklyn and Queens were wide open to anyone carrying any type of luggage or package. A smart terrorist would board with their deadly cargo at the easiest point of entry with minimal security.
-- David Rhodes, Brooklyn, N.Y.

I live in NYC and used to take the subway everyday. Since the London bombing I have stopped riding the train and have switched to the much longer commute of the bus. I like my chances of survival on a bus over the train. But as of today I feel better about the subway due to the searches. My right to be safe supersedes my right to privacy. My right to arrive alive supersedes their right to kill. I don’t mind the search on the train, better than dying.
-- Johanna, Manhattan

• July 21, 2005 |5:49 p.m. ET

Searching – profiling or safety?

Today’s attacks in London brought quick responses from all around this country.  Yet beyond increasing the number of those heavily armed officers around trains and subways, what really can be done to protect mass transit?  Possible suggestions are random searches of bags. But whose bags should be searched?

“Connected” asks its viewers:  Could these random searches be considered profiling?

Your E-mails:

We shouldn't just focus on whether or not someone has a bag or not, or their skin color, but all officers should have training on reading body language. We should do more to profile on nervous behavior.
-- J. Baley

Making the criteria for the random searches of people prior to them entering the public transportation areas  public will only make the job easier for the terrorist. They will then know what not to do.   I am so amazed at the information that is made public - a little less detail of our plans would go a long way.
-– Catherine Bratt

The "War on Terrorism" seems to be less and less effective. We in this country are too politically correct and too worried about offending a race to look at possible terrorists just because they have dark skin. How many terrorists are overweight white guys?
-- Kevin Williamson, Cape Canaveral, Fla.

Failing to profile will cause more attacks. The bombings are not connected to any other group then middle eastern Muslims. We are foolish to take the course of political correctness and ignore the obvious. I enjoy your show.
-- Charles Love, Manzanita, Ore.

• July 20, 2005 | 5:25 p.m. ET

SHIELDS & SOURCES

Lawmakers on Capitol Hill held a hearing Wednesday on proposed legislation aimed at protecting journalists from ever having to reveal their sources.  The Bush Justice Department is opposed to these laws.

“Connected” asks its viewers:  Is the government more focused on protecting national security and less concerned about a journalist’s right to an anonymous source?

Your E-mails:

I do not believe a reporter should be afforded a shield law when they are trying to cover up a crime, cover up their own involvement in a crime and or push a political agenda. I believe in Judith Miller’s case she is really working for the White House. There should be no shield law; it should be on a case-by-case basis.
-- Diane Anderson

The real reason that the Bush Administration opposes a Federal Shield Laws for journalists is that such a law would make it harder to hide the lawlessness so rampant in the Bush Administration. It is high time this corrupt administration was held accountable for all its actions from day one.
-- J. Mancuso, Perry,N.Y.

A  reporter should never be allowed to use a shield law to hide a crime or keep someone who has committed a crime from being caught.
-- Karen Massey, S.C.

If there is no protection no one will give information, it’s that simple, there will be no cases to prosecute.  I understand a prosecutor getting all excited about putting someone away based on a leak but if there were no protection there would be no leak and therefore no case seems pretty simple to me, protect the source at all costs!
-- Michael Bresadola

• July 20, 2005 | 12:39 p.m. ET

Bush makes a supreme choice

On Tuesday, President Bush officially nominated D.C. Appeals Court Judge, John G. Roberts to replace the retiring Justice Sandra Day O’Connor.  President Bush says he wants Judge Roberts confirmed by the first Monday in October, when the Supreme Court begins its next term.  The Senate could quickly seal the deal if the bi-partisan bickering  can be kept to a minimum.

“Connected” asks its viewers:  Was Roberts a good pick to help determine the future of the judicial system?

Your E-mails:

Mr. Roberts is another right wing extremist, making our highest court more lopsided than before. I would like to see a more moderate judge appointed to help level the playing field.
-- Bob, Springfield, Ill.

What does the President mean and why does he feel it necessary to say that his nominee to the Supreme Court is "a good man?” Being a good man, whatever that means, is hardly a major qualification for someone to be one the of head jurists in this country.
-- Julian Thomas, Freetown, Mass.

Being steadfast, nice, intelligent is one thing, however, personal convictions and values are quite another. Until I hear Judge Roberts respond on the latter we all should be neutral. Several times this administration has twisted the facts to suit there needs.
-- Mike, Philadelphia, Pa.

I have seen nothing to suggest that Judge Roberts is anything other than a patriot who is interested in preserving the rights guaranteed by the constitution. If we need to amend the constitution, perhaps we need to do it the hard way and start petitioning each state.
-- Madeleine

From what I've seen, Roberts seems smart and, while I likely won't agree with him, I'm confident so far that he won't just bend the Constitution to meet his needs. I'd of course like to know more, and I expect heavy questioning, but my early thought is to confirm.
-- Aaron Allermann, Watertown, Wis.

• July 19, 2005 | 5:23 p.m. ET

Prime Time Pick

Today is one of the biggest decision days the Bush White House has ever had.  At 9 p.m. ET, President Bush will reveal his choice for his first choice to fill the Supreme Court vacancy left by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor.  Plenty of speculation is occurring over the potential pick and their views.

"Connected" asks its viewers:  What characteristics do you think President Bush will use in picking his nominee?

Your E-mails:

I believe that a nominee should hold one political value.  He and she should interpret the law. Any nominee that does not have this value should not be considered whether he or she is far right, left or moderate.  Can we get someone in the Supreme Court that will up hold this tradition?
-- Shawn Rivera, Fredonia, N.Y.

Listening to the debate it sounds like the judges are running for political office not is a Supreme Court Judge. Jurisprudence selection process has forgotten judging skills or wisdom. It is a sorry state.
-- Bob Malin, Charlestown, R.I.

I am prepared to compliment Bush if he nominates a middle of the road conservative. But, Bush is not a person who has acted to unite the country. Bush has done just the opposite, divide and conquer has been his strategy. 
-- James C. Dunn, San Diego, Calif.

• July 19, 2005 | 12:53 p.m. ET

Flip-Flop Flap (Monica Crowley)

During the last presidential campaign, we heard a lot about “flip-flops.”  Given Democratic Candidate John Kerry’s penchant for changing his position on issues, according to whichever way the political winds happened to be blowing.

But now, there’s a new kind of flip-flop scandal hitting Washington.  And for once, it doesn’t involve John Kerry.  No, this flip-flop scandal involves actual flip-flops, as in the barely there beach foot attire.

On July 12, the Northwestern Women’s Lacrosse team joined 14 other NCAA championship teams for “Champions Day” at the White House.  Members of the Northwestern Wildcats showed up to meet the President of the United Sates, wearing dresses or skirts and flip-flops.

Pardon me, but a day at the White House is not a day at the beach.  You do not show up to meet the Leader of the Free World dressed as if you are about to slather on some Coppertone and catch a wave.

Whatever happened to respect for the office of the Presidency?  Once, when I was working with former President Richard Nixon in the early nineties, he was scheduled to take a trip.  Since I didn’t think I’d be seeing him that day, I wore jeans to the office,

But, when his plane wasn’t able to take off, he started making his way make to the office.  I ran out and bought a whole new outfit, shirt, blouse and yes, close toed shoes and changed before he arrived.
It was a matter of respect for him, and for the office, he once held.  Flip-flops in the White House?  Unthinkable!

But to the girls’ credit, they are turning the controversy into something positive.  The players plan to auction off their White House flip-flops and give the proceeds to a ten-year-old girl suffering from a brain tumor.  Good for them.

But FYI- to anyone with future plans to visit the White House.  The dress code is jacket and tie for men, closed toe shoes for women.  The ghost of Lincoln is watching!

E-mail

• July 18, 2005 | 5:56 p.m. ET

Conversion Camps? (Ron Reagan)

Summer’s here, meaning thousands of kids are heading off to camp and participating in a host of familiar activities: hiking,  canoeing, archery, re-programming their sexual orientation.  Don’t you remember that from your summers at camp?

It’s part of the so-called refuge program, one of several similar efforts to turn gay teens straight.  When a 16-year-old gay Tennessean known only as Zach blogged about being forced to attend one of these camps, other bloggers jumped in and the issue reached new prominence.

According to the Reverend John J. Smid who runs the program in question, the goal is to put “guardrails” around the teens’ sexual impulses.  To that end, there are rules:  no secular music, no more then fifteen minutes behind a closed bathroom door, no contact with other gay folks, and, for reasons I’d rather prefer not to imagine, no Calvin Klein underwear.

Reverend Smid himself claims to be a recovered homosexual.  He goes on to say, “I may see a man and say, he’s handsome, he’s attractive, and it might touch a part of me that is different from someone else.” 

Reverend, that would be the gay part.

At the heart of this is the notion that people choose to be gay so they can chose to switchback.  Common sense suggests otherwise.  Remember coming home from school and telling your parents you decided to be heterosexual?  I didn’t think so.

But the homophobic fringe clings to this mean-spirited fiction so they can deny that issues like same sex marriage are matters of civil rights.  After all, if certain people are simply born gay, it wouldn’t be fair to persecute them.  So, to stave off this uncomfortable reality, they induce in vulnerable teens the same self-loathing that so obviously troubles men like Reverend Smid.

E-mail

• July 18, 2005 | 1:13 p.m. ET

Defending Karl Rove

Karl Rove is still making headlines as top Republicans say its time to ease up on the White House aid.  However, Democrats say the evidence continues to raise troubling questions. 

"Connected" asks its viewers:  Is it time to let Rove go or is his a victim of partisan attacks?

Your E-mails:

Based on the law, as it was written, there was no specific intent, the "victim" was not, and had not been in, a covert position for almost six years. Her husband had "outed" her on his own website.
-- Charles Todd , Sun City, Ariz.

I am not as concerned with the credibility of Karl Rove or even Joe Wilson than I am with the credibility of the Media in the way each of the major news organizations are portraying the issue.
-- Clifton Dick, Front Royal, Va.

This man has violated the National Security Act.  He has “confirmed” a classified fact and that is against the law.  If you or I worked in a classified environment our security clearance would have been pulled immediately.  Karl Rove should have reported this leak immediately and should not have said anything to any person not having a “need to know.”  That is the law.
-- Frank, Montgomery, Ala.

Rove should be fired but he won't.  The White House always does the perfect spin and makes everything look like partisan politics.  He knew what he was doing when he sent out that e-mail and he knew he was publicizing Wilson's wife even though he probably knew she was an undercover operative.
-- Mary, N.J.

Republican or democrat, we are all Americans.  If Rove leaked classified information, he jeopardized the security of our country.  Americans should put politics aside and let Rove be judged by his actions and not his affiliations.  
-- Nancy Cole

• July 15, 2005 |