Chris Rock: Not sanitized
for your protection
Oscar takes chance by putting comic
in charge of self-aggrandizing evening
![]() Kevork Djansezian / AP file Chris Rock will be the host of the 77th Annual Academy Awards. |
Movie video |
Cameron discusses 'Avatar's' story Director James Cameron and actors Sam Worthington and Sigourney Weaver discuss the story of "Avatar." |
Slideshow |
December movies James Cameron’s spectacle “Avatar” hits theaters, along with George Clooney, who is “Up in the Air,” and Robert Downey Jr. as “Sherlock Holmes.” more photos |
The question that naturally arises from the choice of Chris Rock to host the 2005 Oscars on February 27th is the same one that arose in the Reese's Peanut Butter Cup commercials of old: Will there be more of the Oscars in Chris Rock, or will there be more of Chris Rock in the Oscars?
In some ways, Rock is an easy choice. Entertainment Weekly named him the nation’s funniest person in 2004, and it isn’t as if Billy Crystal can keep coming back to distract attention from some of the other less successful hosts of recent years. But Rock has already offered some surprising comments about the job, including that he doesn’t watch the Oscars himself for the most part and that he expects — practically demands — a Jamie Foxx victory. Anyone who believes that you really know what you're getting when you throw Chris Rock into a nearly live broadcast hasn't seen his standup stuff.
Rock is the first truly new blood at the ceremony in a very long time. Hosting the Oscars is a task that has gone to members of a single cohort for nearly 15 years. With the exception of David Letterman's historically disastrous 1995 appearance, the only people who have hosted the show since 1990 are Billy Crystal, Steve Martin and Whoopi Goldberg. All three are essentially the same person in one key respect: they had grown into safety by the time they were asked to host.
Billy Crystal came to prominence playing one of television's first gay characters on “Soap,” but by the time he hosted the Oscars for the first time in 1990, he had already appeared in “When Harry Met Sally,” the quintessential edge-free date movie of its era. Similarly, when Whoopi Goldberg hosted in 1994, she was long past her one-woman-show days and had already been in two “Sister Act” movies. Steve Martin hosted in 2001, long after making the transition to Funny Warm Dad roles.
Not sanitized for your protection
Chris Rock, on the other hand, has done nothing that makes him all that familiar or comfortable for, say, your grandma. Even with a lot of mainstream success under his belt, he maintains a cutting sensibility and has yet to choose to settle thoroughly on any particular family-friendly image. In fact, that's what may make the task so challenging for him. It is the job of an awards show host to be funny but not objectionable, which is why the experience tends to be so neutering in the first place.
In fact, one could argue that an inability to read the room and know that you can’t really make fun of it in a way that actually makes anyone look bad was what sank David Letterman. Letterman isn’t really capable of pretending not to think anything is stupid, and the Academy Awards were no exception. So the audience of pampered celebrities didn't take to him, so they didn't laugh, so it seemed like he was bombing.
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM MOVIES |
| Add Movies headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide




