MSN Tracking Image
  MSNBC.com
Newsweek.com

Q&A: Earthquake Expert on Deadly Tsunami
Page 1 | 2
Newsweek

How fast can such a wave go?
In the open ocean, it can travel as fast as 800 kilometers (500 miles) per hour—like a commercial airplane—so it took two or three hours. This leaves time for a system to warn people, but there wasn’t one in place.

What was the most awesome about this quake?
Its biblical nature. Its biblical size. And that it spanned two continents. The effect of the tsunami was made worse by the fact that so many people live on the coast, tourism is near the coast, and airports are at low elevations. Television reports show damage largely limited to people within a few miles of the coastline. Inland there are few problems. This is a new phenomenon. If people lived 100 meters (330 feet) above the sea, there would have been few casualties.

Should people in tsunami zones move away from the coast?
They feel desperate now because they fear it will happen again, but they will probably forget about these fears in a year or so, as people do, so there must be international pressure to create a warning system.

If a quake this magnitude hit on land, how would it have been different?
First of all, on land, you wouldn’t have the tsunami. Then, depending on whether it was close to a large city, it would have destroyed it—or done nothing. In the high mountains of Tibet, there are 8.5s that change the landscape, but they don’t kill anyone. Earthquakes like the one yesterday, in a subduction zone, have a repeat time of 200 or 300 years. A subduction zone is where one plate flows under another—in this case the Indian plate flows under the Burma plate. Subduction zones have the fastest repeat times in the world.

Could we see another huge earthquake in the near future?
This was so large that it consumed all of the stored energy in the area. We are recording aftershocks, but no one is expecting another humongous one.

The chance of a massive aftershock?
Very low. We are recording magnitude 6s and a few larger than that, but an 8 on the Richter scale seems unlikely in the same region—unless this quake triggers one in a different area. Some people are saying that another one is more likely to the southeast of Sumatra, in the coming days or weeks—but it probably wouldn’t be as big. This was the fifth largest of the last century.

What are the most likely spots for another monster quake or a tsunami?
The ring around Sumatra toward the east and Japan. It is where the largest tsunamis in the world strike. The region where 95 percent of the earth’s seismic activity is released and where there are the most active volcanoes is part of a band spanning from Myanmar, around Sumatra to the southeast toward the Sea of Japan, Alaska and the Western U.S., and then south toward New Zealand.

Can people in some of the world’s poorest countries really prepare for this kind of quake?
Moving away from the coastline isn’t very feasible. Tourism also has to be on the coast or people wouldn’t go. People should expect their governments to do something. If governments don’t do something, there’s no hope. The kind of poor people who were affected far from the epicenter often don’t even know what happened. It is like an ocean wave that isn’t related to anything that simply comes and kills you. You can react to a normal earthquake with its standard shaking, you can make your house stronger—and then you might survive. But this felt more like an omen.

<< PREVIOUS
Page 1: Shook the entire world


© 2009 MSNBC.com