House votes to crack down on video voyeurism
Calls practice the new frontier of stalking
Tech Holiday Gift Guide |
10 cool gadgets we really, really want Santa's little helpers have been busy cranking out some great stuff, from connected media players and multitouch screens to wafer-thin HDTVs and groovy netbooks. |
Tech and gadgets videos |
Police patrolling Facebook Nov. 13: The Medina, Ohio, police department is posting pictures of wanted criminals on Facebook in an effort to get the public's help in tracking them down. WKYC's Mike O'Mara reports. |
Video |
Auto Tech |
A better economy may lure buyers, but these trends could seal the deal. |
WASHINGTON - Calling video voyeurism the new frontier of stalking, the House on Tuesday approved legislation to make it a crime to secretly photograph or videotape people, often for lascivious purposes.
Under the legislation passed by voice vote, video voyeurism on federal lands would be punishable by a fine of not more than $100,000 or imprisonment for up to one year, or both.
Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said the issue of surreptitious videotaping has become “a huge privacy concern” with the miniaturization of technology and the proliferation of cell phone cameras.
People have used these devices for purposes like secretly taking pictures beneath women’s skirts in such places as school locker rooms, department store dressing rooms and private homes.
Rep. Michael Oxley, R-Ohio, a former FBI agent who has promoted the legislation, said there are were many Web sites devoted to such pictures, where they “can be instantly posted on the Internet for millions to view.”
Secretly photographing people in a compromising position is against the law in some states, but there is no federal law. Oxley said the legislation could serve as a model for states that have not enacted anti-voyeurism laws.
The bill would make it a crime to videotape or photograph the naked or underwear-covered private parts of a person without consent when the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.
The Senate unanimously passed a similar bill, sponsored by Sen. Mike DeWine, R-Ohio, in June 2003. Sensenbrenner said he understood that the Senate would accept the minor changes made in the House bill.
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM TECH AND GADGETS |
| Add Tech and gadgets headlines to your news reader: |
Resource guide


