Skip navigation
advertisement

Al-Qaida suspect Padilla refiles lawsuit

Action comes after Supreme Court ruling

Video: Security  
Reading terrorists their rights
Denis McDonough, deputy assistant to President Barack Obama, explains the conflict of interest between the White House and critics about whether the alleged Christmas Day bomber should have been Mirandized.

Text alerts on msnbc.com

Breaking news alerts (about 1 per day)
Click here to sign up or text NEWS to MSNBC (67622).

Find more alerts at alerts.msnbc.com

updated 2:28 p.m. ET July 6, 2004

CHARLESTON, S.C. - A lawyer for Jose Padilla, the man accused of being part of an al-Qaida plot to set off a radiological “dirty” bomb and being held at the Navy brig in Charleston, has refiled his lawsuit against the federal government.

An attorney for the New York-born defendant said Tuesday she filed a complaint in U.S. District Court in Charleston after the U.S. Supreme Court decided last week that Padilla’s original case, which named the commander of the Charleston brig, should not have been filed in New York.

“We have to just move forward,” said attorney Donna Newman, who filed the lawsuit Friday.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

The Supreme Court justices did not address the question of whether President Bush had authority to designate Padilla an enemy combatant or whether indefinite detention without charges or trial violated his constitutional rights.

The government said Padilla proposed the idea for a bomb that would distribute radioactive debris to a top al-Qaida terrorism coordinator who has since been arrested in Pakistan.

Padilla was arrested in May 2002 when he returned from a trip to Pakistan.

When Padilla met with Newman at the brig in March, it was the first time in nearly two years he had been able to see an attorney.

In the case of the other U.S. citizen held as an enemy combatant, the Supreme Court ruled that Yaser Esam Hamdi, arrested in Afghanistan, does have the right to use U.S. courts to challenge his detention and status. The decision overturned a lower court’s ruling that the government had wide latitude to hold Hamdi and deny him access to courts because he was caught fighting against the United States on foreign soil during wartime.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Sponsored LinksGet listed here
Online College Courses
Boost your career with an online Degree. Pick from Leading Colleges!
www.EarnMyDegree.com

Sponsored links

Resource guide