'Crying all night in the cold': Afghan family buries 8th child
After fleeing war zone, Kabul’s 35,000 internal refugees find life of squalor
-
-
x
Jump to video Afghan president to meet with Taliban
-
- video
-
x
-
-
x
Jump to discuss comments below
- discuss
-
x
-
-
x
Next story in The New York Times Almost half of new vets seek disability
-
- related
-
x
Below:
Video: Afghan president to meet with Taliban
-
Closed captioning of: Afghan president to meet with Taliban
>>> karzai will hold talks with the taliban . they hope to start a peace process more than a decade after the war began. what more can you tell us about this?
>> reporter: well, hello, thomas. what we can say is it seems the u.s., afghanistan, and taliban are inching closer and closer to negotiation table. the afghan government was sidelined, they feel the u.s. was trying to keep them out of the loop. they would have preferred that the taliban open offices in a more mutual country like saudi arabia or turkey, friendlier to the afghan government . they accepted the qatar offices but they continue negotiations in saudi arabia . the taliban , spoke to the spokesperson, he says any discussion of negotiations is premature. they sent a list of demands to the afghan government they want to be met before they come to the negotiation table as a confidence building measure. demands that include releasing senior taliban leaders being held at places like guantanamo bay or other u.s. prisons throughout the world.
>> atia, leon panetta raised some eyebrows with comments on "60 minutes" that somewhere somebody knew osama bin laden was hiding in abbottabad. what is the fallout from that?
>> reporter: what's interesting, you talk to u.s. officials, whether here in afghanistan and pakistan or even in washington, d.c., they say the same things that leon panetta actually said, but they don't say it on the record, they're afraid to voice those opinions. so what secretary panetta said is basically what every other american official, military official has been saying for some time now. that being said, the reason these officials haven't said it in the past is they don't want to continue to fan the flames that is already burning between the u.s. and pakistan , so obviously some very strong words coming from secretary panetta, words that will obviously upset pakistan even more.
Discuss:
More from
-
US headlines from
- The Animal Lifeboat: Zoos’ Bitter Choice: To Save Some Species, Letting Others Die
- California Farmworkers’ Community Hurt by Budget Crisis
- Political Memo: Campaigning Tests Obama’s Staying Power
- No Name Key Electricity Plan Divides Residents
- Tropical Storm Beryl Threatens the Southeast
- With Personal Data in Hand, Thieves File Early and Often
- In Rarefied Sport, a View of the Romneys’ World
-
Top stories from
- Syria Denies Responsibility in Brutal Attack
- At West Point, Asking if a War Doctrine Was Worth It
- Diplomatic Memo: Frustrations as U.S. and Pakistan Fail to Mend Ties
- Reporter’s Notebook: Azerbaijan Revels as Host of Eurovision Song Contest
- For Tech Start-Ups, New York Has Increasing Allure
- Nepal Disbands Legislature as Talks on Constitution Fail
- Nadal Has Chance at History on French Open Clay
“ ”