Text: We're sorry. The text content of this page is no longer available.

Video: What’s our ‘obligation’ in Afghanistan?

  1. Transcript of: What’s our ‘obligation’ in Afghanistan?

    MR. GREGORY: ...and I don't want to get into that, that level right now. I want to move on to some other topics, including a huge one, which is Afghanistan .

    Senator Durbin , when are we going to get a decision from the senator? And has he taken too long to announce the strategy? The president, we're talking about, of course.

    SEN. DURBIN: No, I want him to take the time that's necessary. I think the president is trying to reassess the overall strategy, as he should. Many of us believe that we've missed an opportunity in Afghanistan by diverting our attention to Iraq . I was one of 23 who voted against that war. I think that was a serious mistake. It has cost us many lives and great treasure. But equally important, it has diverted our attention from the task at hand, those responsible for 9/11, al-Qaeda and their Taliban allies. I want the president to take the time to get it right, and I think he should. And I don't know when that's coming, but I'm going to defer to the president's decision, working with his secretary of defense, secretary of state and the generals in the field.

    MR. GREGORY: Senator Lieberman , Ike Skelton , which is the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee , supports General McChrystal 's policy of, of additional forces. He said this about the endgame, the exit strategy : "When the area has been stabilized... then it's time to go home." Is that the obligation for the United States , that Afghanistan must be stabilized before we leave?

    SEN. LIEBERMAN: Yeah. Yeah, that's our goal, and, and it's our goal for good reason. As Senator Durbin just said, we were attacked on 9/11 from Afghanistan . If we leave Afghanistan with less than success as a, as a country that can govern itself and protect itself, it's going to have a terrible destabilizing effect on the rest of the region. So I don't like it when people say we have no long-term interests in Afghanistan or we're looking for an exit strategy . We, we, we have -- we don't want to have a long-term interest in having our military there long term, but we have real long-term interests in this place being stabilized. And...

    MR. GREGORY: How long will it take?

    SEN. LIEBERMAN: I don't know. We didn't know when we adopted the surge in Iraq . But the surge in Iraq , the additional troops following the same strategy that General McChrystal wants to apply here in Afghanistan worked in about a year. I think we have the same potential to turn this tide and set back the Islamist extremists who are our enemies in this war that we're in.

Discuss:

Discussion comments

,

Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments
  1. Jump to video

    What’s our ‘obligation’ in Afghanis...

  2. Jump to discussion

    U.S. officials see hope in anti-Taliban militias