U.S. officials see hope in anti-Taliban militias
The rise of these groups spurs optimism of a large-scale tribal rebellion
-
-
x
Jump to video What’s our ‘obligation’ in Afghanistan?
-
- video
-
x
-
-
x
Jump to discuss comments below
- discuss
-
x
-
-
x
Next story in The New York Times 13 children among 19 dead in Qatar mall fire
-
- related
-
x
Below:
Video: What’s our ‘obligation’ in Afghanistan?
-
Transcript of: What’s our ‘obligation’ in Afghanistan?
MR. GREGORY: ...and I don't want to get into that, that level right now. I want to move on to some other topics, including a huge one, which is Afghanistan .
Senator Durbin , when are we going to get a decision from the senator? And has he taken too long to announce the strategy? The president, we're talking about, of course.
SEN. DURBIN: No, I want him to take the time that's necessary. I think the president is trying to reassess the overall strategy, as he should. Many of us believe that we've missed an opportunity in Afghanistan by diverting our attention to Iraq . I was one of 23 who voted against that war. I think that was a serious mistake. It has cost us many lives and great treasure. But equally important, it has diverted our attention from the task at hand, those responsible for 9/11, al-Qaeda and their Taliban allies. I want the president to take the time to get it right, and I think he should. And I don't know when that's coming, but I'm going to defer to the president's decision, working with his secretary of defense, secretary of state and the generals in the field.
MR. GREGORY: Senator Lieberman , Ike Skelton , which is the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee , supports General McChrystal 's policy of, of additional forces. He said this about the endgame, the exit strategy : "When the area has been stabilized... then it's time to go home." Is that the obligation for the United States , that Afghanistan must be stabilized before we leave?
SEN. LIEBERMAN: Yeah. Yeah, that's our goal, and, and it's our goal for good reason. As Senator Durbin just said, we were attacked on 9/11 from Afghanistan . If we leave Afghanistan with less than success as a, as a country that can govern itself and protect itself, it's going to have a terrible destabilizing effect on the rest of the region. So I don't like it when people say we have no long-term interests in Afghanistan or we're looking for an exit strategy . We, we, we have -- we don't want to have a long-term interest in having our military there long term, but we have real long-term interests in this place being stabilized. And...
MR. GREGORY: How long will it take?
SEN. LIEBERMAN: I don't know. We didn't know when we adopted the surge in Iraq . But the surge in Iraq , the additional troops following the same strategy that General McChrystal wants to apply here in Afghanistan worked in about a year. I think we have the same potential to turn this tide and set back the Islamist extremists who are our enemies in this war that we're in.
Discuss:
More from
-
World headlines from
- Egypt Confirms Candidates for Presidential Runoff
- Annan Arrives in Syria, Urging Cease-Fire After Massacre
- Patching Troops Together, One Ache at a Time
- Chinese Man Kills Himself to Protest Son’s Death in Tiananmen Sq.
- Fire at Qatar Mall Kills 19, Including 13 Children
- Tibet Self-Immolations Moves to Lhasa
- Turkish Court Indicts 4 Israeli Military Leaders
-
Top stories from
- Annan Arrives in Syria, Urging Cease-Fire After Massacre
- Tony Blair to Explain Ties to Rupert Murdoch
- Spanish Borrowing Costs Rise on Bank Troubles
- In Etan Patz Case, Chasing One Confession to Bolster Another
- Patching Troops Together, One Ache at a Time
- Earth’s Core: The Enigma 1,800 Miles Below Us
- Sidebar: Sidebar: A Judge’s Proposal to Curb Prosecutors’ Sentencing Power
“ ”