Envoys scale back U.N. climate pact ambitions

updated 12:52 p.m. ET Nov. 5, 2009

BARCELONA, Spain - Negotiators and diplomats were working Thursday on a scaled-back version of a global climate change treaty that could be agreed by next month's deadline, without firm U.S. commitments.

The idea of forging a political agreement, instead of a legally binding treaty, was becoming a more accepted possibility as negotiators acknowledged some nations, including the United States, would not be ready in time for the December U.N. climate conference in Copenhagen, Denmark.

"People are more and more talking about a framework, a framework that you clarify further in the following months," said Artur Runge-Metzger, chief delegate from the EU Commission.

European officials said they envisioned a political accord emerging from Copenhagen enshrining plans by developed countries to cut carbon emissions and by emerging economies to trim back the growth of their emissions. It also would include specific numbers on how much money wealthy countries would channel to the poor to combat the effects of climate change.

Such a political deal would not be legally binding, but would carry the authority of world leaders who would come to the Danish capital to sign off on it. Negotiations would continue for several months and possibly one year until a legally binding treaty was ready, the officials said on condition of anonymity, due to the sensitivity of the ongoing talks.

"We as the EU will certainly push and push and push to get a real legal outcome," Runge-Metzger said, adding that the Copenhagen agreement should "definitely ... have a timetable" for negotiating a full treaty.

Even an interim deal would clear the way to mobilize funds to help poor countries. The EU has said $7.4 billion to $10.4 billion will be needed over the next three years for developing nations to begin planning their first steps toward controlling their emissions and protecting themselves against the effects of climate change.

'Morally binding' if nothing else
Yvo de Boer, the top U.N. climate official who oversees the negotiations, said any decision emerging from Copenhagen that is accepted by all 192 countries would be "morally binding" even without formal legal status.

The United States — the only industrialized nation to reject previous climate deals — had pledged to be a leader in climate change policy after President Barack Obama took office. U.S. climate legislation was bogged down this week, however, as a group of conservative Republican senators demanded more cost-analysis of the bill, which calls for cutting greenhouse gas emissions from power plants and factories by 83 percent by 2050. On Thursday, Democrats on the panel approved the legislation with no Republicans present, and it will now be merged with bills being written by five other Senate panels for a vote by the full Senate. The House has already passed a climate bill.

"This cannot be an excuse for the world not to get an answer to the climate problem," said Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt, whose country holds the rotating EU presidency.

"We need a strong agreement that puts together all the efforts that all the countries — both developed and developing — are ready to put on the table," Reinfeldt said Thursday while visiting India. "I hope to see world leaders come to Copenhagen to make the handshake."

Nations had hoped to conclude a new climate treaty at Copenhagen to succeed the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which called on 37 industrial countries to reduce emissions of heat-raising gases by an average 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. The U.S. rejected it because it made no demands on major developing countries like India and China.

MORE FROM CLIMATE CHANGE

Climate Change Section Front

Ice reveals cold, hard climate facts Ice expert explains CO2 studies Sky-high glacier in Bolivia is melting away Led by China, CO2 gases rose in 2008 Giant jellyfish head north in warming world Alaska fights to reverse polar bear listing Warming drives off Cape Cod's namesake Clinton: No binding climate treaty likely Record high temps are double the lows Carbon storage? Not under my house! Climate Change Section Front   Add Climate Change headlines to your news reader: