Obama’s looming Afghanistan decision
President is having second thoughts about sending more troops to war
-
-
x
Jump to text
- text
-
x
-
-
x
Jump to discuss comments below
- discuss
-
x
-
-
x
Next story in The New York Times Tuna carry Fukushima radiation to US
-
- related
-
x
Below:
Video: Obama mulls next steps in Afghanistan
-
Closed captioning of: Obama mulls next steps in Afghanistan
>> turn now to nbc's mike vaquera at the white house , where today's violence underscores the hard choices facing president obama as he reassesses the course of war in afghanistan . mike, when might a white house decision come on whether to deploy more troops to afghanistan ?
>> well, lester , administration officials say today that that decision on a new strategy will be set to announce within a matter of weeks. to that end, the white house has two more high level meetings scheduled in the situation room here at the white house in this coming week. all this is playing against a very unusual back drop, lester . general mcchrystal, you just saw in jim miklaszewski 's piece, has come forward with a plan that includes the very controversial option of adding 30,000 to 40,000 more troops to the u.s. presence in afghanistan . that's an option that the president hasn't even embraced himself, and yet general mcchrystal has made a major foreign policy speech in london just this past week promoting that plan. now, the president did meet with general mcchrystal aboard air force one while the president was in copenhagen. they met on the tarmac, and the president spoke with the general for about 25 minutes. there was also a very high level meeting earlier last week, three hours the president chaired and the general participated in via video conference . today the president's national security adviser says they haven't even gotten to the question of how many troops to put in, how many more additional troops to put in. they say they want to develop the strategy before the resources. meanwhile, the politics are very difficult in washington. members of the president's own party, leading members of congress are against sending more troops. meanwhile republicans say follow mcchrystal's advice now or risk losing afghanistan to the taliban, lester .
>> thank you.
>>> and now to another national
Discuss:
More from
-
World headlines from
- Offices of Egyptian Candidate, Shafik, Burn
- Pressure Grows on Syria as Annan Arrives After Houla Attack
- Patching U.S. Troops Together in Afghanistan, an Ache at a Time
- Fire at Qatar Mall Kills 19, Including 13 Children
- Hamas Makes Step Toward Palestinian Unity Government
- Ciudad JuÁrez Journal: Virtual Therapy Helps Ciudad Juárez Residents Cope
- China Cracks Down on Web Critics
-
Top stories from
- Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits Begin to Wind Down
- DealBook: Dewey & LeBoeuf Files for Bankruptcy
- Pressure Grows on Syria as Annan Arrives After Houla Attack
- Offices of Egyptian Candidate, Shafik, Burn
- The Caucus: On Memorial Day, Romney and McCain Appeal to Enthusiastic Veterans
- 2-4 Marine Unit Marks Ramadi Losses
- Hard by Canada Border, Fears of Crackdown on Latino Immigration
“ ”