Skip navigation
advertisement

Judge’s review: Salinger spinoff a ‘dismal’ book

But question emerges over whether its publication was blocked too quickly

Slideshow
  First-class confessions
In his new book, “PostSecret,” blogger Frank Warren shares the juicy secrets that people have anonymously sent to him on postcards.

more photos

The Week in...  
  
Image:
AP
  Animal Tracks
A Frisbee-playing pooch, a Scuba-diving Santa, a racing greyhound and more images of cute critters.
Image:
AP
  The Week in Pictures
A fiery protest in Greece, Baghdad bombing, winter winds, a cold dip in China, a relaxing bath in Hungary, police officers remembered and more news and feature images from around the world.
Image: Actress Blake Lively attends the premiere of "Sherlock Holmes" in New York
Reuters
  The Week in celebrity sightings
Blake Lively takes in the "Sherlock Holmes" premiere, Keira Knightley makes her stage debut, Snoop Dogg cooks up brownies with Martha Stewart and more.
  
  Last-minute gifts for under $50
Dec. 20: Robyn Moreno, author of “Practically Post,” joins NBC’s Lester Holt with some affordable choices for the holiday shopper who isn’t quite finished yet.

updated 4:02 p.m. ET Sept. 3, 2009

NEW YORK - Federal appeals court judges had plenty of questions Thursday about a Swedish author's so-far unsuccessful attempt to publish a book in the United States that was once promoted as a sequel to J.D. Salinger's "The Catcher in the Rye."

The three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals expressed doubts about whether a lower-court judge heard enough evidence before blocking the U.S. publication this summer of "60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye."

Judge Guido Calabresi was sure of one thing though — his opinion of the novel by Swedish author Fredrik Colting. He gave an instant review of the book that's already published in England, referencing it as "this rather dismal piece of work if I may say so."

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

The case largely hinges on whether Colting's book transforms Salinger's original creation enough that it qualifies to be published as "fair use" of copyrighted work.

How 'transformative' is new book?
Edward H. Rosenthal, a lawyer for Colting and SCB Distributors Inc., which would distribute the book in the United States, told the judges that Judge Deborah Batts had banned the book even though it was "highly transformative with enormous amounts of commentary and criticism."

Marcia Beth Paul, a lawyer who argued on Salinger's behalf, said publication of the book would violate her client's right not to publish any sequels of the novel, a fixture in classrooms across the world for more than half a century.

Paul was questioned repeatedly by Calabresi and Judge Jose A. Cabranes.

Calabresi asked whether the lower court judge might need to hear more evidence because the case relates to the First Amendment.

Paul said the book copied too much of Salinger's work.

"It is clear on its face that this work is not transformative," she said.

'I am not a pirate'
"The Catcher in the Rye," which has sold more than 35 million copies, tells the story of 16-year-old Holden Caulfield immediately after he is kicked out of a prep school just before Christmas and decides to explore New York City before returning to his family home.

Published in 1951, it was written by Salinger, of Cornish, N.H., who did not attend arguments in the case after challenging publication of the new novel.

Colting, who lives near Gothenburg, Sweden, has said in a court document that he did not "slavishly copy" Salinger when he wrote the novel, his first, under the pseudonym J.D. California.

"I am not a pirate," he wrote.

Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Sponsored links

Resource guide