House health plan to boost taxes on rich

Business groups issue warning
The business groups also warned that the U.S. health care system could be damaged by adding a government-run insurance plan and a federal council that would make some decisions on benefits, as called for in the legislation. Thirty-one organizations signed the letter, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Business Roundtable representing top corporate CEOs and the National Retail Federation.

The House bill would change the way individuals and many employers get health insurance. It would set up a new national purchasing pool, called an exchange. The exchange would offer a menu of plans, with different levels of coverage. A government plan would be among the options, and the exchange would eventually be open to most employers. Insurers say that combination would drive many of them out of business since the public plan would be able to offer lower premiums to virtually all Americans.

But backers of a public plan — including Obama — say it would provide healthy competition for the insurance industry.

Under the House bill, the government would provide subsidies to make coverage more affordable for households with incomes up to four times the federal poverty level, or $88,000 for a family of four and $43,000 for an individual. Medicaid — the federal-state health program for the poor — would be expanded to individuals and families up to 133 percent of the poverty line. The legislation also would improve the Medicare prescription drug benefit by gradually reducing a coverage gap known as the 'doughnut hole.'

INTERACTIVE Who's who in the health care debate A look at the key players shaping the national debate over health care — including the legislators and policymakers at the center of it all.

The individual and employer coverage requirements would raise about $200 billion over 10 years, the Democratic aide said.

Even before the bill was unveiled, the House Ways and Means Committee announced it would vote on the proposal beginning on Thursday. The panel is one of three that must act before the bill can go to the full House, probably later in the month.

Across the Capitol, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee slogged toward passage of its version of the bill on what was expected to be a party-line vote. Another panel, the Senate Finance Committee, was striving to unveil a bill by the end of the week. But the outlook in the Senate remained uncertain.

Got a health care question? Still confused about the health care debate? Do you need a term or phrase clarified? Click here to e-mail msnbc.com's Tom Curry.

Some House Democrats privately have expressed concern that they will be required to vote on higher taxes, only to learn later that the Senate does not intend to follow through with legislation of its own. That would leave rank-and-file House Democrats up for re-election next year in the uncomfortable position of having to explain their vote on a costly bill that never reached Obama's desk or became law.

MORE FROM THE WHITE HOUSE

The White House Section Front

NYT: White House intruders want to sell tale Life isn’t all glamor for Obama crashers   Obama cites economy in weekly address Can Obama retain Hispanic support? Dinner crashers met Obama, White House says Afghan teens allege abuse at U.S. ‘black’ site Ho-ho-ho! White House Christmas tree arrives Newsweek: How Obama is changing China Old fridge? ‘Cash for Appliances’ looms Obama: Too many fear end of American dream The White House Section Front   Add The White House headlines to your news reader: