Supreme Court will not revive Plame's lawsuit
Former CIA operative accused Bush administration of leaking her identity
NBC Video: Politics |
John Birch Society exposed Dec. 23: Rachel Maddow outlines the conspiracy theories and fevered imaginings that make up the belief set of the John Birch Society. |
Slideshow |
more photos |
INTERACTIVE |
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court will not revive a lawsuit that former CIA operative Valerie Plame brought against former members of the Bush administration.
The court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Plame and her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson.
A lower court last year threw out the lawsuit in which Plame and Wilson accused former Vice President Dick Cheney and several former high-ranking administration officials of disclosing her identity to reporters in 2003. Plame and Wilson said that violated their constitutional rights.
The lawsuit named former presidential adviser Karl Rove; Cheney's former top aide, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby; and former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage.
The U.S. Court of Appeals said that Plame and Wilson did not meet the legal standard for constitutional claims, in part because the lawsuit hinges on alleged violations of the Privacy Act — a law that does not cover the president or the vice president's offices.
Case background
Armitage was the original source for a 2003 newspaper column identifying Plame as a CIA officer. At the time, her husband was criticizing the Bush administration's prewar intelligence on Iraq and had become a thorn in the side of the White House. Rove also discussed Plame's employment with reporters.
|
Nobody was ever charged with the leak itself and Plame's lawsuit is one of the last remaining legal issues associated with the case.
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM MORE POLITICS |
| Add More politics headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide





