Doctors: No proof anti-aging hormones work

CHICAGO — The American Medical Association says there's no scientific proof to back up claims of anti-aging hormones.

1. Don't miss these Health stories
   1. 
      Facebook is now fueling organ donations

      Becky Melton’s “friend” request to Jerry Wilde, a complete stranger in dire need of a new kidney, came with a photo and a gift. The texted photo: a picture of Melton, 28, holding a hand-drawn sign showing two kidneys and a message -- “We’re a match!

   2. Why you should smile at strangers
   3. Grill, drive, play: Doc's tips for Memorial Day safety
   4. Cheating guys more likely to die of a heart attack
   5. German doctors apologize for Holocaust horrors

At their annual meeting in Chicago on Monday, AMA delegates adopted a new policy on products such as HGH, DHEA and testosterone used as aging remedies.

With HGH, or human growth hormone, the AMA says evidence suggests long-term use can present more risks than benefits. The risks include tissue swelling and diabetes.

And the AMA says there's no credible evidence that other hormones, so-called bio-identicals, are safer than traditional estrogen and progesterone products.

The traditional hormones are only recommended for menopause symptoms at the lowest possible dose because of long-term health risks.

The AMA says anti-aging hormone promoters need rigorous studies to prove, or disprove, their claims.