Skip navigation

Dick Cheney's national security remarks

Transcript of the former vice president's speech as prepared for delivery

Video
  Obama, Cheney spar over national security
May 21: In dueling speeches delivered Thursday, President Barack Obama defended his plan to close Guantanamo, but former Vice President Dick Cheney made it clear that he viewed things very differently. NBC's Andrea Mitchell, Pete Williams, and David Gregory report.

Nightly News

INTERACTIVE
Image: Dick Cheney
Cheney in the spotlight
Since leaving office, Dick Cheney has become a vocal critic of the Obama administration. Take a look at some of the comments the former vice president has made.

NBC News

Video
  Obama: Gitmo a 'mess,' 'misguided'
May 21: President Obama delivers an address on national security, terrorism and the closing of Guantanamo Bay prison.

MSNBC

Slide show
AP I CUB US Guantanamo Five Years
  Inside Guantanamo
A look at the controversial U.S.-run detention center in Cuba, home to prisoners accused of having terrorist ties.

more photos

Video
  Montana's offer
May 20: Hardin, Montana’s town council voted unanimously to accept 40 percent of the detainees from the prison at Guantanamo Bay.

Countdown

Video: White House  
  
Obama weighs Afghan troop options
Nov. 11: President Obama meets with his war team amid reports he's made a decision to add tens of thousands of troops to Afghanistan, reports the White House denies. NBC's Brooke Hart reports.

Follow @msnbc_politics for more news from D.C.

Interactive
Explore a 3-D White House
Check out historical info, photos, and panoramic images.
White House visitor logs
Image: The White House
Public records
Help figure out who has been visiting the White House during the first eight months of the Obama administration.
NBC News and msnbc.com
updated 11:47 a.m. ET May 21, 2009

WASHINGTON - Thank you all very much, and Arthur, thank you for that introduction. It's good to be back at AEI, where we have many friends. Lynne is one of your longtime scholars, and I'm looking forward to spending more time here myself as a returning trustee. What happened was, they were looking for a new member of the board of trustees, and they asked me to head up the search committee.

I first came to AEI after serving at the Pentagon, and departed only after a very interesting job offer came along. I had no expectation of returning to public life, but my career worked out a little differently. Those eight years as vice president were quite a journey, and during a time of big events and great decisions, I don't think I missed much.

Being the first vice president who had also served as secretary of defense, naturally my duties tended toward national security. I focused on those challenges day to day, mostly free from the usual political distractions. I had the advantage of being a vice president content with the responsibilities I had, and going about my work with no higher ambition. Today, I'm an even freer man. Your kind invitation brings me here as a private citizen - a career in politics behind me, no elections to win or lose, and no favor to seek.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

The responsibilities we carried belong to others now. And though I'm not here to speak for George W. Bush, I am certain that no one wishes the current administration more success in defending the country than we do. We understand the complexities of national security decisions. We understand the pressures that confront a president and his advisers. Above all, we know what is at stake. And though administrations and policies have changed, the stakes for America have not changed.

Right now there is considerable debate in this city about the measures our administration took to defend the American people. Today I want to set forth the strategic thinking behind our policies. I do so as one who was there every day of the Bush Administration -who supported the policies when they were made, and without hesitation would do so again in the same circumstances.

When President Obama makes wise decisions, as I believe he has done in some respects on Afghanistan, and in reversing his plan to release incendiary photos, he deserves our support. And when he faults or mischaracterizes the national security decisions we made in the Bush years, he deserves an answer. The point is not to look backward. Now and for years to come, a lot rides on our President's understanding of the security policies that preceded him. And whatever choices he makes concerning the defense of this country, those choices should not be based on slogans and campaign rhetoric, but on a truthful telling of history.

Our administration always faced its share of criticism, and from some quarters it was always intense. That was especially so in the later years of our term, when the dangers were as serious as ever, but the sense of general alarm after September 11th, 2001 was a fading memory. Part of our responsibility, as we saw it, was not to forget the terrible harm that had been done to America … and not to let 9/11 become the prelude to something much bigger and far worse.

That attack itself was, of course, the most devastating strike in a series of terrorist plots carried out against Americans at home and abroad. In 1993, terrorists bombed the World Trade Center, hoping to bring down the towers with a blast from below. The attacks continued in 1995, with the bombing of U.S. facilities in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; the killing of servicemen at Khobar Towers in 1996; the attack on our embassies in East Africa in 1998; the murder of American sailors on the USS Cole in 2000; and then the hijackings of 9/11, and all the grief and loss we suffered on that day.

CONTINUED
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next >

Sponsored links

Resource guide