Skip navigation

Support for House climate bill broadens

Democrats in auto, coal and energy states back it; GOP still opposes

  Join NBC's Green Week
INTERACTIVE
Carbon calculator
Wonder how much carbon dioxide you're responsible for on your commutes? Our map-based calculator will give you a pretty good idea, and get you started on a diet.
Slideshows
Image: Belchatow Power Station
Reuters
Climate conditions
View signals of temperature shifts across the globe, as well as some approaches to dealing with change.
Interactives
Vital Signs of a Warming World
The science, impacts and scenarios of climate shifts
Carbon trade game
Learn how "cap and trade" works and play along in a simulated market.
Rising seas
What future sea levels could mean for some of America's favorite places
The greenhouse effect
How the Earth maintains a temperature conducive to life
Cooling the planet
Check out five far-out ideas on how to engineer a cooler Earth.
Eyeing the ice
The National Science Foundation's Tom Wagner on why climate experts study Antarctica.
Melting mountains
Data shows five areas of concern
updated 5:20 p.m. ET May 18, 2009

WASHINGTON - Several key Democrats from industrial and oil states threw their support behind a draft climate bill Monday as a House committee began work on massive legislation that would impose the first U.S. limits on greenhouse gases.

While Democratic sponsors of the 948-page bill called it essential to shift the United States away from fossil fuels to cleaner energy sources and deal with global warming, Republicans argued it would send energy prices soaring and threaten economic growth.

"Our nation is at a crossroads," declared Rep. Henry Waxman, a Democrat and the committee's chairman "We can continue to look the other way and leave these problems to our children, or we can adopt a new energy policy for America."

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

Waxman in recent weeks has spearheaded delicate closed-door negotiations with other Democrats on the Energy and Commerce Committee, hoping to structure the bill so as to get enough support to push it to the House floor, despite expected unified Republican opposition. Similar legislation was passed by a Senate committee but the measure stalled when the full Senate took it up last year.

3 key votes
The House negotiations appeared to bear fruit when two key Democrats on the committee — Reps. John Dingell and Gene Green — announced their support of the bill. Last week, Rep. Rick Boucher, a Democrat who has made protection of coal interests a priority, also endorsed the legislation.

Dingell, the longtime and ardent protector of the U.S. automakers, said he still has some concerns, but that generally the compromises have produced "a good bill" he can support. The bill includes several provisions Dingell wanted including a "cash for clunker" automobiles measure and allowances to help automakers invest in electric vehicles.

Green had sought help for the oil industry, which is prominent in his state of Texas, and got enough to bring him on board. He said the bill provides help for refiners during the transition toward greater use of nonfossil fuels. Democrats also stripped away a provision that would have required refiners to meet a mandatory low-carbon motor fuel standard.

"The United States can either chose to ignore the climate threat ... or it can act. Today we choose to act," said Green.

The bill would establish a limit on greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels by power plants, refineries and factories. Such emissions would have to be 17 percent lower by 2020, compared to 2005 emissions, and 83 percent lower by midcentury.

Click for related content

GOP: Cap and trade is energy tax
To ease the economic impact, the government would issue pollution allowances, or permits, that could be traded on the open market. About 85 percent of those allowances in the early years are to be provided free by the government to ease the cost of the emission reductions.

Republicans, nevertheless, have characterized the "cap-and-trade" approach as tantamount to a massive energy tax because it would make energy from fossil fuels — especially electricity produced from burning coal — more expensive.

"We are putting the entire American economy ... through an absolute economic wringer," declared Rep. Joe Barton , the committee's top Republican.

Barton complained that the cost issue and how emission allowances would be distributed have not been given a full airing. "We do know ... the cost is going to be astronomical," he said.

Barton promised later in the week a Republican alternative that scraps the cap-and-trade approach while providing incentives for industry to develop clean energy without mandated emission reductions.

Republicans have promised dozens of amendments and Democrats are expected to have a few as well. A final committee vote on the bill is not likely until near week's end.

Many environmental groups — including a climate alliance headed by former Vice President Al Gore — support the Democratic bill even after the many changes. But Greenpease USA is among a few that oppose it, saying Democrats caved in to industry demands.

Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Sponsored LinksGet listed here
Online College Courses
Boost your career with an online Degree. Pick from Leading Colleges!
www.EarnMyDegree.com

Sponsored links

Resource guide