Will the people pay for quality iPhone games?

Winda Benedetti Citizen Gamer • E-mail

How much are you willing to pay for an iPhone game?

Would you pay 99 cents? How about $1.99? Do I hear $4.99 … maybe $9.99? Would you pay $20? What’s that you say? You want your iPhone and iPod touch games for … free?

You know that adage; nothing in life is free? Turns out, that’s not exactly true. Just check out Apple’s App Store and you’ll find thousands of games that cost exactly nothing … or pretty close to it.

The App Store — an online outlet for useful, entertaining and sometimes bizarre programs for the iDevices — has been live and kicking for nine months now, and as of last week consumers had already downloaded one billion apps from the store. Yes … one billion.

Of the more than 35,000 programs currently available, games make up the biggest category in the App Store. In fact, there are currently more than 9,000 of them to be had.

But if you look at the App Store’s daily lists of the top 100 paid-for games, you’ll notice something — on a typical day more than half of them cost $1.99 or less. And that doesn’t count the more than 2,000 games you’ll find for free.

The question then is: Do you get what you pay for? And is this kind of rock-bottom pricing good for gameplay and the future of Apple’s new gaming handheld? More importantly, which games are actually worth spending money on?

Steve Palley, founder of iDevice game-review site SlideToPlay.com and former Editorial Guru for Vivendi Games Mobile, believes this bottom-of-the-barrel pricing could be unhealthy for iPhone game developers and for game quality.

“It’s going to be a problem in the long run, simply because it'll stunt the profit potential on these games,” he says. “I think this has been disguised somewhat by the iPhone's tremendous organic growth, but eventually it'll turn the App Store into a slum full of lazy match-three clones.”

Welcome to the slum
Palley makes a good point. Check out the App Store today and you’ll find that many of the games are not worth the time it takes to download them. Lazy match-three clones, goofy gags that are amusing for five minutes — yes there are thousands of games in the App Store, but sometimes it feels like wading through an ocean of garbage.

James Brown Beautiful puzzle game "Ancient Frog" is a perfect example of the kind of creative thinking the App Store and iPhone have inspired.

On the other hand, the App Store offers some truly brilliant and totally unique games. Here developers of all stripes can create games for a relatively low cost and gamers can try them for almost nothing. In many ways, this has created a breeding ground for creativity as both creators and consumers feel free to take risks. And those risks can pay off big time — just check out awesome experimental games like “Zen Bound” and “Ancient Frog” (but more on the games worth paying for here).

Still, it seems App Store customers have grown used to paying pocket change for their games. Even a game like “Bejeweled 2” (the mother of all match-three games) started out at $9.99 in the App Store and is now on sale for $2.99.

Among those who make App Store games, “there’s definitely been a race to the bottom in terms of pricing,” says Andrew Stein, director of mobile business development at PopCap Games (the creator of “Bejeweled”).

And that can mean developers have to walk a careful line. PopCap decided to price their latest iPhone game — “Bookworm” — at $4.99 instead of $9.99.

“We need to be cognizant of some of the competitive pressures, but at the same time our games offer huge value to the consumer,” Stein says. “We’re not interested in devaluing the brand by pricing it at 99 cents. It is a premium experience. We do invest a lot in our products. We take the time and do it right.”

Palley has been an advocate of getting deeper and more complex games into the App Store — the kind of games that rival those on the Sony and Nintendo handhelds.

“We want better, more expensive games, but not enough people are willing to pay for them to make them profitable. It sucks,” he wrote in a recent article on SlideToPlay.com. “For now, the main use case for the majority of people who buy iPhone and iTouch games is the one-to-five minute ‘gameplay snack.’ They want novelties and amusements, not gameplay.”

MORE FROM CITIZEN GAMER

Citizen Gamer Section Front

This holiday season, let the games begin! Through the eyes of a killer Video games are cheaper than couples therapy Wake up to video game sleeper hits Gaming our way to musical genius Will gamers go for Sony's PSPgo? Which game machine is right for you? In dark gaming times, Nintendo DS shines Is the president a video game hater? Console wars: Microsoft drops Xbox 360 price Citizen Gamer Section Front   Add Citizen Gamer headlines to your news reader: