Bankruptcy won’t solve automakers’ woes
Experts say taxpayers would be saddled with much higher costs
Video |
What's next for the automakers? Feb. 18: The next six months will be critical for General Motors and Chrysler. CNBC's Phil LeBeau reports. CNBC |
INTERACTIVE |
10 odd-looking foreign cars From the Fiat 500 to the Tata Nano — these foreign cars leave us speechless. |
Latest interest rates |
See today's average mortgage rates across the country.
See today's average home equity rates across the country.
See today's savings rates across the country.
See today's average auto rates across the country.
|
Slideshow |
more photos |
GM, Chrysler’s viability plans |
Highlights of the viability plans GM and Chrysler submitted to the Treasury Department on Tuesday. GM: Eliminates a total of 47,000 jobs globally in 2009, or about 19 percent of GM's total work force, including cuts already announced. The company expects to have 72,000 hourly and salaried workers in the U.S. by 2012, down from 92,000. Plans to close another five U.S. factories for a total of 14, bringing the number of its plants to 33 in 2012. Reduces the number of vehicle models. The plan envisions a reduction in nameplates from 48 in 2008 to 36 by 2012. The December plan called for 40 nameplates by 2012. GM's plan calls for five new vehicle launches by 2012, down from 12 new launches stated in the December plan. Plans to roll out Chevrolet Volt electric car remain on track for 2010. Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC remain key brands. Pontiac becomes a niche brand. Seeks sale or spin-off of the Saturn division. GM will wind down production of Saturn models by 2011 if no buyers emerge by March 31. CHRYSLER: Will cut three models in 2009: the Chrysler Aspen and PT Cruiser, and the Dodge Durango. Will eliminate 3,000 employees, remove 100,000 units of production capacity, reduce a manufacturing shift, cut fixed costs by $700 million, and sell $300 million in "non-earning assets" in 2009. Says although it is viable as a standalone company, it still plans tie-up with Italian automaker Fiat SpA. (See Treasury Department Web site for full text.) |
Source: The Associated Press |
On Tuesday evening, meeting a deadline to file viability plans with the U.S. Treasury Department, GM and Chrysler asked the government for up to $21.6 billion in additional government loans by March 31 to survive the current recession. The funds would come on top of the $17.4 billion allocated to the automakers in December.
The automakers’ new requests were accompanied by plans for thousands more job cuts, slashing of models and brands, union concessions and the prospect of even further expense cuts — acknowledgments that the U.S. auto industry has grown significantly worse since late December, when the Bush administration granted the automakers billions in federal loans to stay in business.
Bankruptcy is the dirty word of the automotive industry’s current dilemma. Late last year, as the automakers sought financial help from the government, some industry observers argued that a traditional bankruptcy filing — or Chapter 11 proceedings, where a company gains court protection from its creditors while it reorganizes its operations — could create a vicious cycle, pulling down other automakers like Ford and their suppliers and ultimately have a devastating impact on the broader U.S. economy.
They also argued that consumers would not want to buy vehicles from an automaker that is in bankruptcy proceedings, for fear of not having their vehicle warranties honored.
But even though GM and Chrysler are burning through hundreds of millions of taxpayers’ dollars each month, most analysts still say bankruptcy, or some form of it, would not necessarily be a good option for the struggling automakers.
|
That would mean a few million jobs lost, Zandi said, which would be “cataclysmic” for the U.S. economy, already shedding about a million jobs every two months. A better option would be to give the automakers the extra funding they need to stay in business until March 31. Then the government could prepare for a bankruptcy later on with provisions for securing financing to bring them through Chapter 11 and guarantee vehicle warranties.
On Tuesday afternoon, the White House said it has not closed the door to a government-backed bankruptcy for the struggling automakers. This is not a common or garden bankruptcy. In a government-run, “prepackaged” bankruptcy — one in which a company prepares its reorganization in cooperation with its creditors and implements it as soon as it enters bankruptcy — a company can keep operating while it gets relief from its obligations, including any contract with its union.
Analyst David Leiker at financial services firm Robert W Baird still sees bankruptcy as the best option for the automakers. Although it is likely to be “painful near-term, we continue to believe that the challenges to restructuring GM and Chrysler are too complicated to be met outside of a bankruptcy,” he said Wednesday.
Large U.S. companies have successfully emerged from bankruptcy in the past. In September 1983, Continental Airlines’ Chairman Frank Lorenzo put the airline into bankruptcy. He brought it out again days later as a new, restructured Continental, hiring back employees at lower salaries than the airline had originally paid.
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM THE DRIVER'S SEAT |
| Add The Driver's Seat headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide





