Obama on 'Buy American' collision course?

Tom Curry National affairs writer • Profile • E-mail

President Barack Obama has signaled opposition to “Buy American” provisions in economic stimulus legislation now before Congress, a decision that could put him on a collision course with congressional Democrats and labor unions.

Both the $819 billion stimulus bill passed by the House last week and the Senate version being debated now, which has an estimated price tag of more than $900 billion, would require that infrastructure projects carried out under the program use U.S.-made iron and steel. The current version of the Senate bill would go further, requiring that all manufactured goods used in the projects be U.S.-made.

The argument for the “Buy American” provisions seems simple and, at a time of major job losses in the United States, compelling.

“If we want to put people back on payrolls to try to put this country back on track. ... the way to do that, with the hundreds of billions of dollars that are in this bill, is to say, at least try to buy things that are made in America,” Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., the chief advocate of the Buy American provision in the Senate bill, said in a speech on the floor last week.

“That is not unfair. It is not selfish,” Dorgan said. “It is the right thing to do."

Buy American provisions are supported by many congressional Democrats and trade unions as well as some industries, notably American steel manufacturers. Opponents include many key Republican lawmakers, U.S. industries that rely heavily on exports and major U.S. trade partners.

Late Wednesday, the Senate softened the provision requiring that only U.S.-made iron or steel used in construction projects paid for in the bill. A move by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., to delete the requirement failed, 31-65. But the requirement was changed to specify that U.S. international trade agreements not to be violated.

'A potential source of trade wars'
But Obama signaled in an interview Tuesday that he may seek to have the Buy American requirements deleted before the legislation reaches his desk.

Asked by ABC News anchor Charles Gibson about the provision, Obama replied, “I don’t want provisions that are going to be a violation of World Trade Organization agreements or in other ways signal protectionism. I think that would be a mistake right now. That is a potential source of trade wars that we can't afford at a time when trade is sinking all across the globe.”

Video   One-on-one with President Obama Feb. 3: In an interview Tuesday with NBC’s Brian Williams, President Obama talks about the botched Tom Daschle nomination. Nightly News

Dorgan reacted to Obama's statement Wednesday, saying, "I have said all along that I am not interested in starting a trade war, and the Buy American provisions in the economic recovery bill would not do that.

"I am working with the White House and other Senate colleagues to ensure the Buy American provision is crafted in a way that would not violate our international trade agreements."

The Senate Wednesday was debating and voting on amendments to the the stimulus bill, but it was not clear whether an amendment will be offered to eliminate the Buy American provision.

Economists Gary Clyde Hufbauer and Jeffrey Schott of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a Washington think tank, said in a study released Tuesday said that the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement does in fact prohibit the Buy American requirement. The institute generally favors measures to promote international trade.

Bills provide some leeway
Both the House and Senate bills allow the Buy American requirements to be waived if the head of the federal department supervising the construction project determines it would be “inconsistent with the public interest” to force states and local governments to use only U.S.-made products.

The bills also allow project managers to opt out if using U.S. products would increase the cost of the infrastructure project by more than 25 percent.

In their study, Hufbauer and Schott estimated that the House bill would increase employment in the U.S. steel industry by about 1,000 jobs, while the Senate bill would increase employment by about 9,000 jobs.

MORE FROM CAPITOL HILL

Capitol Hill Section Front

Health reform hits doctor deficit reality Homeland Security chairman faces ethics probe Aide: Baucus nominated girlfriend for fed post Senate preserves long-term care program Reid cooks up health-care deal Fed chief, under assault, defends his record Congress worries over Obama's Pakistan plan Medicare cuts stay in Senate's health care bill Lawmakers divided over paying for Afghan war Gates: 'Severe consequences' for Afghan failure Capitol Hill Section Front   Add Capitol Hill headlines to your news reader: