Skip navigation

Rourke’s redemption tale appeals to everyone

‘It has to do with the puritan DNA of our country,’ says one film professor

Slideshow
Image: Mickey Rourke
  Mickey Rourke’s bumpy road
From boxer to actor and back again, Mickey Rourke’s journey shows all over the crevices in his worn face.

more photos

By Michael Ventre
msnbc.com contributor
updated 1:21 p.m. ET Jan. 28, 2009

If F. Scott Fitzgerald had met Mickey Rourke before he uttered that classic morsel of melancholia, “There are no second acts in American lives,” he might have added, “… well, except for Mickey.”

Actually, every once in a while in Hollywood, a star who has taken a destructive detour or two and seems destined for the scrap heap suddenly reinvents himself through a personal cleansing, a period of intense reflection, and a good agent.

Rourke is getting raves — and he received an Academy Award nomination, his first — for his portrayal of Randy “The Ram” Robinson in “The Wrestler.” Since he broke through with a small but significant part in Lawrence Kasdan’s “Body Heat” in 1981 and then in a major role in Barry Levinson’s “Diner,” Rourke’s career has been marked by flashes of brilliance obscured by clouds of excess.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

Robert Downey Jr. came from the depths of drug abuse to marquee bankability, and he just received another Oscar nomination, this time for “Tropic Thunder.” Lindsay Lohan made a mess of her career, and there’s no telling if she’ll rebound and achieve her potential as an actress.

What does it take to pull a Mickey Rourke and get back on your feet in Hollywood?

“No. 1, it takes talent,” said Peter Bart, editor of Variety and a former studio executive. “No. 2, it requires the ability to recast yourself in the right role. For example, (Robert) De Niro sustained his career by taking on brilliant comedic roles. With Mickey he chose to come back not as a boxer but as a wrestler.

“It’s important to be realistic. At a different age, you have to pick your spots.”

‘The right role, in the right movie’
Rourke established a reputation in Hollywood for being difficult to work with, and as someone who was finicky about the projects he was offered. Like Downey Jr., Rourke also abused drugs and alcohol and behaved erratically. He once lost a role in a major film after punching out a drug dealer.

How does someone like that see a month like January 2009, in which he won a Golden Globe and received an Oscar nomination? How does such an actor, who seemed to debase himself with boxing in the same way his character in “The Wrestler” did with wrestling, suddenly find himself offered roles in major motion pictures like “Iron Man II” and the Sylvester Stallone-directed “The Expendables”?

That’s Hollywood.

Video
  Rourke on Oscar nomination
Jan. 23: Mickey Rourke received an Oscar nomination for his performance in “The Wrestler.” He’s talking to TODAY’s Matt Lauer about that film and his new status as a comeback kid.

Today show

Steven Zaillian knows the terrain better than most. He nabbed a screenwriting Oscar for “Schindler’s List” and has directed “Searching for Bobby Fischer,” “A Civil Action” and “All the King’s Men.” He is somewhat of an authority on actors who have faded but are not completely forgotten.

“Whenever I begin casting, I make a list of actors I like but haven’t seen in anything in years,” he said. “I don’t care if they have a troubled past. Can they act is the more important question. If there was a time they could, odds are they still can. I tried to cast the king of trouble, Marlon Brando, in ‘A Civil Action,’ but the studio wouldn’t do it. This is Marlon Brando we’re talking about.

“In many cases, actors’ pasts may not be troubled, but they’ve fallen out of favor to the degree they are no longer starring in high profile films like they used to.”

Zaillian offered the example of Jackie Earle Haley, who had made a mark as a young actor years ago in “The Bad News Bears” and “Breaking Away,” but effectively disappeared not long afterward. Zaillian wanted him for a part in “All the King’s Men,” but couldn’t find him. Finally, he tracked him down in San Antonio.

“He had given up acting because it had given up on him,” Zaillian said. “He auditioned by putting himself on tape. And it was stunning. He wasn’t 17 anymore, like he was in ‘Breaking Away.’ He was 43. But what he had as a young actor he still had. He proved it again in ‘Little Children,’ and has since worked in ‘Shutter Island’ and ‘Watchmen.’

“He’s back.”

Slideshow
Image: Robert Downey Jr.
  2009 Academy Award nominees
Comeback kings Robert Downey Jr. and Mickey Rourke join Oscar queen Meryl Streep and a host of hopefuls looking for a statuette.

more photos

Finding one’s way back onto Hollywood’s radar is no easy task, whether an actor withdraws from the spotlight willingly or not.

“I do believe comebacks are possible,” Bart said. “But I don’t believe they’re universal. There are lots of young kids too numerous to mention who blew it.

“If you have a remarkable talent like Mickey or Downey, you can do it. Downey is such a keenly intelligent person. Yeah, you can get back.”

So what is the secret?

“Very simple,” film critic Roger Ebert said via e-mail. “The right role in the right movie. I don’t know what else will do it.”

Ebert added that it takes the right person to fit the right situation, and Rourke happens to be special. “I’ve always admired his solid, authoritative presence — his physical bearing, his direct acting style, his wry humor,” Ebert said. “I think ‘Barfly’ with Rourke as Charles Bukowski, is the overlooked performance.”

Tales of redemption
Leo Braudy teaches English and film at the University of Southern California. He said there is an appetite among Americans for stories of redemption like those of Rourke, Downey Jr. and others.

“It’s certainly an old pattern,” he said. “The mythology is there for someone to come along and fill it. ‘Rocky,’ for example, which won best picture. That’s the basic story of a down-and-out boxer who comes back and redeems himself. Even if he doesn’t win, he redeems himself.

“It has to do with the puritan DNA of our country. It’s about revealing yourself to the congregation and then being washed clean by the audience essentially.”

And even though the comeback story is quintessentially American, Braudy pointed out that different cultures have different responses. The French, he said, never stopped liking Rourke.

“The French tend to like the primitive in American artists in general,” Braudy said. “They like what they feel is really American. They used to do this with the Brits as well. They don’t like the sophisticated American artist. They like the primitive artist. They like someone who has gone through the mill rather than someone with a more obvious acting style.

“It’s the noble savage, dating back to the 18th century. The primitive and the natural. That’s a pattern that’s American.”


Sponsored links

Resource guide