Obama plan depends on swiftly spending cash

updated 11:38 a.m. ET Jan. 5, 2009

WASHINGTON - Washington bureaucrats have a reputation for being able to spend taxpayer money real fast. But, believe it or not, spending it fast enough is one of the biggest hurdles President-elect Barack Obama's team faces in putting together an economic recovery measure.

Obama's stimulus plan depends on swiftly pumping hundreds of billions of federal dollars into the economy to create jobs. The focus is on tax cuts and government spending that can provide an immediate lift to the economy.

However, the $675 billion-$775 billion plan emerging in talks between Obama's team and Democratic allies in Congress also appears to contain lots of money that won't be spent for years — such as for water projects, rebuilding the electric grid and buying billions of dollars of computers and software for the health care sector. Much of that money won't get spent until the economy starts growing again.

Some GOP critics say Democrats are simply using the current economic crisis to put money into long-term projects now, rather than in a few years when concerns about record budget deficits might threaten the spending.

"We must ... make distinctions between what is 'stimulus' ... and what is merely more government spending on favored projects we don't need with money we don't have," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

One example is a plan to spend billions of dollars on a new health care information technology system that would make the delivery of health care safer, more effective and more efficient.

During the campaign, Obama promised $50 billion over five years for the initiative. The upcoming economic recovery bill will provide less.

Even so, little of the program can get underway quickly and building the system is years away. Basic questions like privacy rights and a design that would allow computers for doctors, hospitals and insurance companies interact have yet to be resolved.

Even Obama's economic advisers have warned privately that as the stimulus bill increases in size, its quality inevitably declines. The economy can absorb only so much public investment over the next two years. Republicans are even more skeptical.

"It's incredibly difficult to identify things that are valuable in the long run, can be financed in the short run and get the money out the door quickly," said former Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Holtz-Eakin, who advised Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign. "It would be preferable to take any stimulus you feel is necessary and target it on a few things — don't spread it as seed money for a thousand programs that'll never stop growing."

"Right now, we have an emergency on our hands," counters House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey, D-Wis. "If the House is burning, you're not going to worry about which hose you grab, so long as you get water on the fire."

Obama officials promise a "use it or lose it" rule to force states and localities to spend new federal money quickly to stimulate jobs. Such an approach could prompt officials to choose more wasteful projects that can be built soon over better ideas that might take a while.

"There's a tension here between wanting to do the most meritorious projects for the long term and wanting to do stuff that boosts the economy quickly," said budget expert Bob Greenstein of the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

MORE FROM ECONOMY AT A CROSSROADS

Economy at a Crossroads Section Front

Economy gets tidings of hope for holidays Europe leads in bonus crackdown, is U.S. next? Geithner: TARP extension sets stage for end New jobless claims rise, trade gap narrows Americans’ net worth rises for second quarter Foreclosure activity falls for fourth month Obama outlines bailout for Main Street Bernanke: Too soon to tell if recovery will last theGrio: Black teens' unemployment rate spikes NYT: U.S. forecasts smaller loss from bank bailout Economy at a Crossroads Section Front   Add Economy at a Crossroads headlines to your news reader: