Skip navigation

World mulls tougher action against pirates

Military assault to free ship's hostages is too risky, experts say

Piracy Tanker Hijacked
This Saudi supertanker loaded with $100 million in crude oil is among the hijack victims of Somali pirates.
William S. Stevens / AP
updated 4:54 p.m. ET Nov. 21, 2008

BRUSSELS, Belgium - It sounds easy: Dispatch naval commandos to storm a hijacked cargo ship, shoot or capture the ragtag band of pirates and free the hostage crew.

But experts warn such a rescue attempt would be extremely risky, endangering 300 hostages on other hijacked vessels and breaching U.N. mandates, maritime laws and international merchant marine guidelines.

The problem is further complicated by regional politics and practical issues such as the massive size of the area being patrolled by a handful of warships: about 1.1 million square miles, an area larger than the Mediterranean Sea.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

NATO currently has just four warships on duty off the 2,400-mile-long coastline of Somalia, an impoverished nation caught up in an Islamic insurgency that has had no functioning government since 1991.

The U.S. 5th Fleet based in Bahrain, contributes to the policing of the Somali coast with several ships stationed in the region as part of America's anti-jihadist war. Working alongside are frigates from several other nations — including Russia, India, Malaysia and Denmark.

Next month, the European Union takes over the NATO mission, sending four ships to replace the four currently patrolling under the NATO flag.

Hands tied
The Europeans say they may send more ships if necessary but caution such a move would take time because of the need to prepare boats and crew trained for the North Atlantic to operate in the Indian Ocean's equatorial waters.

Currently, patrols work under a restrictive U.N. mandate that allows force only in the case of direct attacks on the 20,000 cargo ships transiting through the area annually.

"They can patrol. They can deter. They can even stop attacks that are happening, but what they do not do is then board the ship that has been hijacked elsewhere to try and free it," NATO spokesman James Appathurai said.

The U.S. Navy is similarly constrained.

"We have a full range of options ... that allow us to stop pirates from attacking merchant vessels," said Cmdr. Jane Campbell, a spokeswoman for the 5th Fleet in Bahrain. "But once the ship is hijacked, it's a hostage situation and we don't see a military solution is the right one to pursue."

Responding to the crisis, the Security Council on Thursday imposed new sanctions on pirates, arms smugglers, and perpetrators of instability in Somalia, but stopped short of allowing warships to intercept seized ships.

Who's taking the lead?
Strategies proposed to combat the piracy scourge include attacking the bandits on land, arming merchant vessels, and rerouting ships away from the volatile region near Somalia for a massive detour around southern Africa.

Experts reject such measures as unrealistic.

"The only solution I see is a coordinated effort by various naval forces. The problem is that no single country wants to take the lead," said Fred Burton, a vice president of Stratfor, a U.S.-based intelligence risk assessment agency.

"Given the pirates' emerging new tactics and technologies, such as using 'mother ships' to transport smaller attack boats out to sea, global positioning systems and satellite phones, it should be expected that the range of pirate activity will increase," he said.

Last week, pirates seized their greatest prize yet, the supertanker MV Sirius Star, far south of the Somali coastline. The ship, carrying 2 million barrels of oil and 25 crew members, is now anchored off a Somali port.


  MORE FROM AFRICA  
  
Africa Section Front
 
Add Africa headlines to your news reader:
 
Sponsored LinksGet listed here
Top Online Schools
Find the perfect online school and Boost your Career! Free Info Pack.
www.EarnMyDegree.com

Sponsored links

Resource guide