Skip navigation

Top court backs Navy in dispute over sonar use

Environmental groups argue sonar use can harm whales

Image: Sonar technicians
Mc2 James R. Evan / US Navy via AP file
Technicians monitor contacts on a Surface Anti Submarine Combat System, aboard the guided missile destroyer USS Momsen off the coast of Southern California in Jan. 2008.
Video
  Supreme Court Rules for Navy in Whales-Sonar Case
Nov. 12: The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the Navy can conduct military sonar training despite arguments that the sound waves can harm marine mammals. Pete Williams has more from Washington.

Nightly News

Video: Environment  
Are Russian spies connected to ‘Climategate?’
Dec. 7: Environmental groups claim that the Climate Change Summit in Copenhagen may be the world’s last chance to stop global warming. However, a scandal over hacked e-mails which suggests that scientists may have fudged data to make the situation appear more dire then it really is calls everything into question. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., discusses.

Text alerts on msnbc.com

Breaking news alerts (about 1 per day)
Click here to sign up or text NEWS to MSNBC (67622).

Find more alerts at alerts.msnbc.com

updated 2:47 p.m. ET Nov. 12, 2008

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Wednesday lifted restrictions on the Navy's use of sonar in training exercises off the California coast, a defeat for environmental groups who say the sonar can harm whales.

The court, in its first decision of the term, voted 5-4 that the Navy needs to conduct realistic training exercises to respond to potential threats by enemy submarines.

Environmental groups had persuaded lower federal courts in California to impose restrictions on sonar use in submarine-hunting exercises to protect whales and other marine mammals.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

The Bush administration argued that there is little evidence of harm to marine life in more than 40 years of exercises off the California coast.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, which was joined by Justices Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.

The court did not deal with the merits of the claims put forward by the environmental groups. It said, rather, that federal courts abused their discretion by ordering the Navy to limit sonar use in some cases and to turn it off altogether in others.

Roberts pointed out that the federal appeals court decision restricting the Navy's sonar training acknowledged that the record contained no evidence marine mammals had been harmed.

The overall public interest tips "strongly in favor of the Navy," Roberts wrote.

Click for related content

The most serious possible injury of allowing the Navy to proceed would be harm to an unknown number of the marine mammals, said Roberts.

"In contrast, forcing the Navy to deploy an inadequately trained anti-submarine force jeopardizes the safety of the fleet," the chief justice wrote.

In dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that the Navy's own assessment predicted substantial and irreparable harm to marine mammals from the service's exercises. She said that "this likely harm ... cannot be lightly dismissed, even in the face of an alleged risk to the effectiveness of the Navy's 14 training exercises."

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Sponsored LinksGet listed here
Online College Courses
Boost your career with an online Degree. Pick from Leading Colleges!
www.EarnMyDegree.com

Sponsored links

Resource guide