Want the watch James Bond wears? Here’s why
Marketing expert Martin Lindstrom looks at product placement in movies
Video |
The science behind shopping Oct. 20: Author Martin Lindstrom sits down with TODAY’s Meredith Vieira to talk about his new book, “Buyology: Truth and Lies About What We Buy,” which explains the scientific reasoning behind purchasing habits. Today show |

Jessica Lynch looks back Dec. 7: When 19-year-old soldier Jessica Lynch was captured and rescued during the early days of the U.S. invasion of Iraq back in 2003, it made international headlines. Meredith Vieira talks to her in the first installment of TODAY’s Buzziest Stories of the Decade. |
Does sex sell? Can subliminal advertising really influence our behavior? The results of a major scientific study are revealed in "Buy-ology." In this excerpt, author and marketing expert Martin Lindstrom looks at product placement in TV shows and movies.
This must be the place
Product placement, "American Idol," and Ford’s multimillion-dollar mistake
Remember that commercial you saw on "American Idol" two nights ago? The one where the tractor salesman was scarfing down those fish sticks, and that kind-of-funny cell phone ad with those two quacking ducks ...
Yeah, me neither. As a matter of fact, I don’t even remember what I had for dinner two nights ago. Steak? Lasagna? Fettucine Alfredo? A Caesar salad? Maybe I forgot to eat. The point is, I can’t recall — just as I have no recollection of the third man who landed on the moon, or the fourth person who summited Mt. Everest.
By the time we reach the age of sixty-six, most of us will have seen approximately two million television commercials. Time-wise, that’s the equivalent of watching eight hours of ads seven days a week for six years straight. In 1965 a typical consumer had a 34 percent recall of those ads. In 1990, that figure had fallen to 8 percent. A 2007 ACNielsen phone survey of one thousand consumers found that the average person could name a mere 2.21 commercials of those they had ever seen, ever, period. Today, if I ask most people what companies sponsored their favorite TV shows — say, "Lost" or "House" or "The Office" — their faces go blank. They can’t remember a single one. I don’t blame them. Goldfish, I read once, have a working memory of approximately seven seconds — so every seven seconds, they start their lives all over again. Reminds me of the way I feel when I watch TV commercials.
![]() |
Another no less important factor behind our amnesia is the pervasive lack of originality on the part of advertisers. Their reasoning is simple: If what we’ve been doing has worked for years, why shouldn’t we just keep on doing it? Which is a little like saying, if I’m a baseball player who’s been striking out regularly for the past decade, why should I bother changing my swing, or altering my stance, or gripping the bat a little differently? A few years ago, I conducted a small experiment — a little narrower in scope than my brain-scan experiment — on my own. I taped sixty different TV car commercials produced by twenty different automotive companies. Each one had been running on TV for the past two years. Each one had a scene in which the new, shiny, and seemingly driverless car guns its way around a hairpin turn in the desert, sending up a dramatic little cloud of dust — poof. The thing is, though the make of car might have differed, that scene was exactly the same in every single commercial. Same swerve. Same turn. Same desert. Same dust cloud. Just for fun, I created a montage of these breathtakingly unmemorable moments on a two-minute reel, to see if I could tell which car was a Toyota, a Nissan, a Honda, an Audi, or a Subaru. And indeed, when I watched the tape, turns out I was stumped. I couldn’t tell one car from the other.
It was, and is, a depressingly true-to-life example of what’s going on today in TV commercials. There’s no originality out there — it’s too risky. Uncreative companies are simply imitating other uncreative companies. In the end, everyone’s a loser because we as TV viewers can’t tell one brand from the next. We watch commercial after commercial, but the only thing we’re left with, if they’ve registered in our memories at all, is the image of a shiny, anonymous car and a handful of dust.
On June 11, 2002, a popular British TV show known as "Pop Idol" made the transatlantic crossing to the United States, and in its retitled debut as "American Idol" became one of the most popular and successful shows in American television history virtually overnight. (The story goes that it never would have been aired in the United States if Rupert Murdoch’s daughter, a huge fan of the show, hadn’t persuaded her father to take a chance on it. She knew what she was doing.)
By now, most of us know how the show works. In its first few weeks, the producers and cast of "American Idol" city-hop around the United States, auditioning aspiring singers whose talent levels range from expert-but-needs-work, to promising, to at times wincingly bad. Over the course of the season, the show’s three judges eliminate all but twenty-four contestants, until finally the home-viewing audience gets the chance to vote each week, with the contestant with the fewest votes getting kicked off. At the end of the season, the last one standing becomes the next American Idol.
But what do aspiring singers, snarky judges, and dreams of fame, glory, and stardom have to do with the next part of our study? Everything. Until now, I’d only suspected that traditional advertising and marketing strategies like commercials and product placement didn’t work — but now it was time to put them to the ultimate test.
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM TODAY BOOKS: MONEY |
| Add Today Books: Money headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide


