Harriet Baskas Travel writer

An in-flight activity practiced by some ill-mannered travelers is about to become even more of a hot-button issue.

We’re not talking about reckless reclining, armrest hogging or even coast-to-coast wind-breaking. The topic du jour is surfing pornography, violent material or other inappropriate content on screens easily seen by nearby seatmates.

It’s icky, irritating, rude — and relatively rare — at least for now. But as Internet surfing becomes an in-flight reality, some flight attendants, passengers and parents are worried that the problem will grow.

I’d like to say I doubt it. Or that it’s a “non-problem,” as some spokespeople for airlines and technology companies have assured me. But, given that in the past six months alone I’ve had to ask one seatmate to turn off a gruesomely violent video and remind another to shield the close-up heart surgery video he was studying, I think we’re in for trouble.

Flight attendants as porn police?
Last July, when US Airways announced that it would begin charging passengers for coffee, tea and soft drinks, flight attendants objected on the grounds that they’re certified safety professionals, “not cashiers to be used” to bolster the airline’s bottom line.

Now that American Airlines is testing unfiltered Internet on some flights, flight attendants are worried that the role of “porn police” is being added to their  job description.

Frank Bastien, spokesperson for the Association of Professional Flight Attendants, the union representing 19,000 American Airlines flight crew members, put it this way: “With all the pressures already involved with flying, why invite something else on board without fully considering the problems it may cause.”

Will airlines zip it up?
Airlines are still ironing out issues associated with paid, in-flight wireless service. Filtering is definitely on the list.

American Airlines spokesperson Tim Wagner told me the carrier's policy was to provide Wi-Fi capabilities “with unfiltered connections that allow customers to get what they need, when they need it.” A few hours later he sent an update: “[W]e want to be responsive to the feedback of our customers and employees. We are researching potential technology options that would filter pornographic content ...”

The Well-Mannered Traveler Tales from airports, planes downright scary Cover your eyes: Not all airlines will filter When it's time for Grandma to stop driving Fresh amenities for pooped-out travelers Coffee, tea or laptop privacy screen? Rubbing out rudeness on public transit Let a president be your tour guide Beyond hotels: hostels, couches and more Much-needed help for holiday travelers More Well-Mannered Traveler columns

Over at Alaska Airlines, which will be soon begin testing and installing in-flight wireless service, spokesperson Marianne Lindsey says the current plan is not to limit content “as we are hoping that the close social environment of the aircraft cabin will encourage people to use good judgment in their Internet browsing.”

Virgin America, which plans to launch in-flight Wi-Fi in November, is hoping savvy flight attendants and socially responsible travelers will make filtering unnecessary. “Flight crews are trained to deal with the issue ... and they do everything they can to move passengers if (for any reason) they are uncomfortable ... due to a fellow passengers’ actions,” spokesperson Abby Lunardini said. However, she added, “We don’t believe that Wi-Fi accessibility will significantly change the formula as there is nothing stopping guests now from downloading the content onto a laptop. Most guests view being on a flight akin to being in any other public place and moderate their behavior accordingly.”

One would hope.

But as well-mannered travelers know, that’s not always the case.

What do travelers think?
Larry Traverso, a textile importer and distributor, says while he’d have no qualms about “politely saying something to the person next to me if they were viewing porn,” he believes it would be reasonable for airlines to block access. “I don't think we can trust the general public to police themselves and I don't think it is appropriate in a public place.”

Video   Is Wi-Fi ready for air travel? Sept. 16: A California company is about to test market a KU-band Internet connection on two major airlines. KNSD-TV's Bob Hansen reports. NBC News Channel

Peter Taylor, the father of two young kids, says unfiltered service raises red flags. For now, he’s confident he can keep his kids from seeing objectionable material on other passengers’ laptops, but as his kids get older he knows shielding them from inappropriate images will be harder. “My kids may have to sit in their own row or they might even fly on their own. And then I can’t do anything.”

Yet there are some, including author and motivational speaker Mellanie True Hills, who feel filtering won’t make a difference. “I've lost count how many times I've seen things that I consider objectionable on DVD players or computers while flying, so filtering Internet content on flights won't solve that problem. ... The problem is that we all have different standards of what is offensive.”

MORE FROM WELL-MANNERED TRAVELER

How to behave in that home away from home

How to behave in that home away from home Spooky, kooky and unpredictable travel tales Tales from airports, planes downright scary Cover your eyes: Not all airlines will filter Wi-Fi Getting elderly drivers off the road poses challenges Fresh amenities for pooped-out travelers Coffee, tea or laptop privacy screen? Rubbing out rudeness on public transit Let a president be your tour guide Beyond hotels: Hostels, couches and more   Add Well-Mannered Traveler headlines to your news reader: