Skip navigation
sponsored by 

After the hurricanes, relief fundraising stumbles

Aid groups wonder, are Americans too distracted, anxious to give?

Young Hurricane Ike evacuee
Hurricane Ike evacuee Nessa Devens, 4, of Corpus Christi, Texas, watches as a Red Cross volunteer serves dinner at a San Antonio Food Bank on Sept. 11.
Lisa Krantz / Zuma Press
Slide show
Image: Galveston resident Patricia Davis reacts as she surveys her badly damaged apartment
  Coming home
Thousands of residents returned to Galveston on Sept. 24 for the first time since Hurricane Ike hit 11 days before.

more photos

Video: Weather
Residents return to see what’s left
Nov. 18: Evacuation orders were lifted as firefighters in California gain control of the wildfires and begin to look for clues to their cause. NBC's Stephanie Stanton reports.

Interactive
Hurricane briefing
What you need to know about hurricanes, their origins and their effects
By Kari Huus
Reporter
MSNBC
updated 10:16 a.m. ET Sept. 25, 2008

Kari Huus
Reporter

E-mail
As Hurricanes Gustav and Ike zeroed in on the Gulf Coast, the Mennonite Disaster Service — a small nonprofit based in Akron, Pa. — ramped up its phone center to handle the expected flood of calls from loyal backers seeking to donate or to volunteer in the disaster area. But unlike the outpouring of support after Hurricane Katrina in 2005, this time the phones stayed mostly silent.

“Usually our constituents rise up and say, ‘What can we do?’” said Scott Sundberg, spokesman for the relief group. “This time, I’m saying, ‘Why aren’t they?’”

The problem is not particular to the Mennonite group. Across the board, relief organizations report that they are struggling to raise funds to pay for their operations in Texas and Louisiana, where thousands of people remain in shelters after the storms. The biggest reason they cite is the dearth of media coverage, which has been diverted by a raging financial crisis and presidential elections.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

“Because of the other big news stories that are out there … the cameras and the lights didn’t stay on to show the need that people have,” said Suzy DeFrancis, spokeswoman for the American Red Cross, which is operating 57 shelters for roughly 6,000 victims of Gustav and Ike and has served 4.5 million meals. “It’s not that the American people don’t care, but that they don’t know.”

When Hurricane Katrina hit, by comparison, public interest was high, both because the damage was of epic proportions and the initial response to the emergency was a dramatic failure. That translated into weeks of non-stop media coverage. The wrenching images of New Orleansians sweltering in the Super Dome and wading through chest-deep water captivated the public, dominated broadcasts and prompted individual and corporate donations in the billions.

“The media coverage plays a huge role in disaster relief giving,” said Patrick Rooney, executive director of the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University. “If you think about Katrina coverage …  broadcasters would say ‘if you want to do something to help, visit these Web sites. … In this case it’s just not the same.”

A more perfect storm
The media deployed vast numbers of staff to the Gulf Coast for Gustav and Ike, but he the attention was short-lived. Gustav was initially bearing down on New Orleans, raising the specter that the newly repaired levees could fail, but the storm veered off and clobbered the bayou to the west. As Hurricane Ike headed for landfall, it looked like it could be another Katrina. When it hit on Sept. 13, though, it was not as deadly as anticipated.

The collapse of the financial services giant Lehman Brothers on Sept. 15 and dire predictions of financial collapse quickly pushed the story out of the top spot and spun newsrooms in a new direction.

But while neither of the hurricanes were as severe as forecast, they did do considerable damage. Gustav topped levees and flooded many lowlands in Louisiana, while Ike clobbered a 500 mile stretch of Texas and Louisiana coastline, devastating the barrier island of Galveston, and causing power outages for millions.

For the small Mennonite Disaster Service, which depends almost exclusively on individual donations, the difference between the support it received after Katrina and the response to Gustav and Ike could hardly be more dramatic. Since early August, the organization has received about $7,000 in donations, compared to the $8 million that poured in shortly after Katrina hit. That means that the nonprofit's initial work in the hurricane zone is being covered largely out of its general funds.

“If we get to a point where we realize we can’t move forward (with services in the hurricane zone) we would have to do something we have never done, which is launch an appeal for donations,” said Sundberg, the group’s spokesman.

Save the Children, a nonprofit that does relief and development work worldwide, told msnbc.com that it also has seen a very weak response in Web donations or checks from the general public. But Anne-Marie Grey, vice president of fundraising for the Washington D.C.-based organization, said the group was able to make up for the shortfall thanks to about $600,000 in corporate donations.

That has prompted Save the Children to focus its upcoming fundraising appeals entirely on foundations and corporations. “It is a very targeted appeal that we are focusing on (entities) who have consistently given to our programs,” she said.

“We’re not seeking the mass market,” she added. “There’s no coverage of what’s going on right now. It would be throwing away scarce resources.”


Sponsored links

Get Your 2008 Credit Score

Find a business to start

Try for Free

Search Jobs

Find Your Dream Home

$7 trades, no fee IRAs

Find your next car