First fear, then loathing, toward Wall Street

Allison Linn Senior writer • Profile • E-mail

Steve Ebels hasn’t been that hurt by the recent stock market roller-coaster ride because he no longer has much to lose.

Ebels, who owns a heating business, said he already lost much of his life savings when a general contractor he was doing work for went belly up, leaving Ebels with a pile of bills for materials and labor he had already invested in the project.

And that is perhaps the biggest reason why Ebels, 51, would like to see the failed Wall Street titans pay for the actions that have led to this crisis. If he has to start over because of a soured business deal, he figures, so should they.

“I would just like to see some way that these people are held personally accountable,” he said. “We’ve got to do more of that in this country: personal responsibility and accountability.”

For Ebels, who lives in Falmouth, Mich., it’s also especially galling that people like him, who are already suffering from the weak economy, will now end up footing the bill for these chief executives’ mistakes.

“All (the bailout has) done is transfer all the indiscretions of all these people onto the shoulders of the taxpayers,” he said.

Full coverage Tens of billions remain in bank bailout fund The government has tens of billions of dollars left in the eye-popping $700 billion bank bailout fund created last fall, prompting a debate in Congress over what to do with it. Weekly jobless claims drop unexpectedly No second stimulus, Obama official says Traffic congestion dips as economy falters One casualty of the recession: U.S. mobility Credit card delinquencies at record high Service sector shrinks less than expected

As Americans digest a dizzying series of events that has left Wall Street shaken to its core,  the mood on Main Street is shifting from fear to loathing. They are angry that government regulators did not do enough to prevent this — and protect them — in the first place. They are upset the government is proposing billions of dollars in bailouts for Wall Street, even as many regular Americans are struggling to hang onto their homes and pay their bills.

They also are livid that massive financial firms in which they trusted took wild risks and made incredibly bad decisions, in turn impacting their personal finances. Some wonder why, in the face of such a massive financial crisis, so few of these executives have stepped up to apologize for, or even try to explain, their actions.

Mostly, they think it’s despicable that many of these top executives could walk away with millions of dollars in their bank accounts, even as some average Americans see their retirement plans thrown into chaos.

The Senate Tuesday opened a series of congressional hearings on the bailout plan that will address some of the issues, such as executive compensation and relief for regular homeowners, that have drawn some of the outrage.

The one thing Susan Provencal, 63, knows is that her retirement will not go as planned. First, Provencal was laid off from one, then another, high-paying job training workers. Then, she had to abandon a plan to live in her getaway home in the mountains because she couldn’t find enough work there, either.

So, Provencal decided to sell that home and put all her equity into a condo in the northern California city of Fairfield, where she found clerical work. But in the year since she bought the condo  — and after staving off phone calls urging her to take on the type of non-traditional home loans at the center of this crisis — she has seen its value plummet.

Now, with her home equity wiped out, her regular income down and her retirement investments suffering, Provencal figures there will be no way she will retire in three years as she had hoped. Plus, she’s worried about her kids and grandkids, who she wouldn’t be able to help if they lost their homes or their jobs.

As she struggles to figure out her drastically changed situation, Provencal says it’s aggravating to think that Wall Street executives aren’t suffering a similar financial fate.

“It’s like adding insult to injury to then see that the government is going to step in, and these idiots that have done wrongdoing for a long time are still going to retain big bonuses,” she said.

Provencal thinks the executives should have seen these problems coming. And if they couldn’t foresee it, then she thinks safeguards are needed to prevent the same thing from happening again.

“I hate to see too much regulation in place, but the bottom line is, these institutions have not been self-regulating,” she said.

MORE FROM STOCKS & ECONOMY

Stocks & economy Section Front

Stocks end the trading day with minor gains Nation’s retailers report weak June sales Weekly jobless claims drop unexpectedly Obama: Nations must fight global warming Oil wavers near $60 as consumers scale back Consumers trim borrowing again in May It's summertime and the living is stingy, mostly Ad pushes legal pot as solution to Calif. deficit One casualty of the recession: U.S. mobility Credit card delinquencies at record high Stocks & economy Section Front   Add Stocks & economy headlines to your news reader: