Judge: Jury should decide Pickford Oscars’ fate
Women who inherited statuettes would like to sell them
Movie video |
Stewart on hot shirtless co-stars Nov. 9: Kristen Stewart chats with Access' Shaun Robinson about all the hot, shirtless werewolves in “New Moon” and whether or not you can love two people at once. Plus, who does Kristen think would make a better husband — Taylor Lautner or Robert Pattinson? |
Slideshow |
November movies The “Twilight” sequel, “New Moon” hits the big screen, along with George Clooney in “The Men Who Stare at Goats” and “Fantastic Mr. Fox” and the apocalyptic “2012” and “The Road.” more photos |
LOS ANGELES - A jury should decide whether silent film star Mary Pickford signed away rights to sell two Oscars she was awarded, a judge ruled Monday.
Three women who inherited the statuettes and a third one awarded to Pickford’s former husband Charles “Buddy” Rogers had hoped to win a dismissal of a lawsuit filed by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. The academy, which each year awards film’s highest honor, is seeking to block the public sale of the statuettes.
Pickford won the best actress Oscar in 1930 for “Coquette,” and was given an honorary Oscar in 1976. Rogers won the academy’s Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award in 1986.
The academy claims it has the right to buy back the Oscars for $10 each.
The women inherited the awards through Rogers’ second wife, Beverly. They claim Pickford won her first Oscar before the academy’s $10 buyback rule was enacted, but the academy counters that Pickford signed an agreement after she won her second Oscar that covers both awards.
Attorneys for both sides argued Monday over whether it is Pickford’s signature on the documents.
Judge Rex Heesemen declined to rule for either party on that issue.
“The more I hear this argument, the more I think these are issues the jury has to decide,” Heesemen said.
|
Attorneys for the Rogers heirs, Kim Boyer, Virginia Patricia Casey and Marian Stahl, wrote in court filings that the academy is dwindling their estate by fighting the sale.
The heir’s attorney, Mark Passin, said he was disappointed with the judge’s ruling.
The case is scheduled to go to trial later this year, although Heesemen said Monday it may be delayed.
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM MORE NEWS AND OTHER FEATURES |
| Add More news and other features headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide



