Chemical companies are upset that Congress hasn't done anything to increase supplies of natural gas, the industry's feedstock. Wind and solar companies warn that failure to renew their tax credits will devastate their industries.

Meanwhile, the narrow escape from Hurricane Gustav, which slammed into the Gulf Coast on Sept. 1, is yet another reminder of the nation's energy vulnerability. With 20 percent of the country's oil production capacity in the Gulf of Mexico, a catastrophic storm would ratchet up the already sharp pain in Americans' pocketbooks.

This delicate political calculus is forcing some in Washington toward compromise. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has agreed to hold a vote on drilling. In early August, Senator John E. Sununu (R-N.H.) won praise from conservatives for not joining the Gang of 10's plan. But he's in a tight race, and New Hampshire has been hit hard by high energy prices. On Aug. 26, Sununu signed on.

Story continues below ↓

advertisement | your ad here

If the plan does come up for a vote in the Senate, it will be a key test for both Presidential contenders, forcing them to go on record on a major issue. McCain has yet to get behind the compromise. Lead economics adviser Douglas J. Holtz-Eakin explains that while McCain supports the notion of a bipartisan approach, he doesn't like the repeal of tax breaks for the oil and gas industry. "Senator McCain believes we don't need to be raising taxes," he says.

In contrast, Obama supports the basic framework, along with the general idea of bipartisan compromise. "If I had to reduce the McCain energy platform to a single word, it would be 'drill,' while ours would be 'diversity,'" explains Jason Grumet, Obama's senior adviser on energy. "It's the difference between serious energy policy and slogans."

More from BusinessWeek
Detroit crashes the convention
Manufacturing jobs in Ohio: two views
McCain's energy intentions
The proposal still faces an uphill battle. "Both the Left and the Right are quite unhappy with what we came up with," says Conrad. "It's kind of sad that offering solutions to a serious challenge facing the country is seen as being disloyal to one's own party."

Even if the political stars do begin to align, Congress doesn't have much time to broker the deal before the Presidential election, and the Bush Administration vows to veto anything that it believes is a tax increase. Meanwhile, falling oil prices could lessen the urgency of the issue for lawmakers. But Washington insiders say real progress has been made toward a compromise that breaks the gridlock on energy. "Whether it happens in this Congress or the next one, it is clear we are close to getting something done," says Gerard.

Also in msnbc.com business
Answer Desk: The risks of investing extensively in gold
Your Career: The repercussions of expressing your faith
Interactive: 10 cars we’re looking forward to in 2010
‘Reaching out’ and the other worst buzzwords of the year
Video: Existing home sales make an unexpected jump