IOC president says Olympics opened up China

updated 12:33 a.m. ET Aug. 24, 2008

BEIJING - Giving the Summer Games to China proved to be the right thing to do and will pay benefits beyond sports, the International Olympic Committee said Sunday, even though it still won’t solve “all the ills of the world” or hasten political change.

“It has been a long journey since our decision in July 2001 to bring the Olympic Games to China, but there can now be no doubt that we made the right choice,” IOC president Jacques Rogge said on the final day of the Olympics.

Despite the grand success of the games in terms of organization, sports venues and athletic performances, the IOC has been accused of failing to get China to live up to promises of improvements in human rights and press freedoms.

“We are first and foremost an organization devoted to sport, but it is sport with a purpose,” Rogge said. “The IOC and the Olympic Games cannot force changes on sovereign nations or solve all the ills of the world. But we can, and we do, contribute to positive change through sport.”

The Olympics, he said, brought unprecedented global scrutiny to the emerging superpower with one-fifth of the world’s population.

“The world has learned about China, and China has learned about the world, and I believe this is something that will have positive effects for the long term,” Rogge said.

Rogge said the Olympics are leaving China with a long-term legacy of sporting facilities, improved urban infrastructure and greater environmental awareness.

“Some of the changes in China are obvious today,” he said. “Others will become apparent with time. The legacy of these games for China is ultimately up to the Chinese people.”

Rogge planned to give his final verdict on the games at the closing ceremony Sunday night, but said London would have a tough act to follow when it hosts the 2012 Olympics.

“It is clear that China has put the bar very high,” he said at a news conference. “So it’s going to be a challenge for London and all the subsequent games. I believe and my hope will be London can even put the bar higher.”

Roge acknowledged that not everything was “perfect” for media access to the Internet during the games, and expressed surprise that no citizen protest permits had been granted.

While Olympics organizers promised to set aside three protest zones in the city during the competition, authorities said all of the 77 applications for permits to protest were either withdrawn or rejected.

“We found it unusual that none of these applications have come through,” Rogge said, adding the IOC was told the cases had been resolved through “mutual agreement.”

Earlier this week, two elderly Chinese women — Wu Dianyuan, 79, and her neighbor Wang Xiuying, 77 — who applied to protest were told they would be sent to a labor camp for a year. They were still at home Thursday under the surveillance of a government-sanctioned neighborhood watch group.

“We heard about these cases and we discussed them with BOCOG,” Rogge said, referring to the local Olympic organizing committee. “The reply we received from the Chinese authorities — this was an application of Chinese law. The International Olympic Committee is not a sovereign organization. We have to respect Chinese law.”

MORE FROM BEIJING OLYMPICS NEWS

Beijing Olympics News Section Front

China’s gold medalists to receive $51,000 each China ends 'truly exceptional games' Castro defends athlete who kicked judge in face Beijing prepares for Olympic venues’ future China deports 10 activists after ceremony After victory, China's sports system at crossroads IOC president says Olympics opened up China New China? Bird's Nest replaces Mao on yuan Celizic: Phelps, Bolt will go down as Beijing's main men IOC: No proof China cheated in gymnastics Beijing Olympics News Section Front   Add Beijing Olympics News headlines to your news reader: