Skip navigation

Rights groups bemoan lack of Beijing protests

Activists say 'both Beijing and the IOC have failed' to raise political issues

Joey Cheek
Gold and silver Olympic speedskater Joey Cheek, co-founder and president of Team Darfur, an international coalition of athletes committed to raising awareness and ending the crisis in Darfur, Sudan, speaks during a news conference at the National Press Club in Washington, Tuesday, July 1, 2008.
Susan Walsh / ASSOCIATED PRESS
updated 9:13 a.m. ET Aug. 20, 2008

The Beijing Olympics have left the world’s human rights groups frustrated and angry — convinced that China has been let off the hook for serious abuses, and adamant that future hosts like Russia must be held to a higher standard.

Western activists also are disappointed that among the thousands of athletes at the games, few have made even low-key efforts to speak out about political repression or China’s economic ties to Sudan, where violence has raged in Darfur.

“Even if there was an athlete that wanted to speak out on issues of human rights, he might be silenced by whatever IOC official is mediating that press event,” Darfur activist and former U.S. Olympian Joey Cheek said in an e-mail Wednesday to The Associated Press.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

Cheek, co-founder of a group of athletes known as Team Darfur, had his visa revoked by Chinese authorities hours before he was to embark for Beijing. Team Darfur athletes who are in Beijing have acceded to International Olympic Committee curbs on political comment, resulting in what Cheek called “massive suppression of any voice that the government doesn’t want heard.”

Prominent human-rights groups have castigated the IOC and the games’ major corporate sponsors for their reluctance to place any public pressure on China on such issues as political dissent and press freedom.

“The Chinese government’s own voluntary pledges to improve human rights, allow public protests and guarantee ’complete freedom to report’ made meeting these self-set human rights benchmarks one of the tests for a successful Olympics,” Minky Worden of Human Rights Watch said in an e-mail from New York. “That is a test that both Beijing and the IOC have failed.”

She said the Beijing games, rather than bequeathing a positive legacy, “may leave in place permanent technological surveillance and monitoring networks that make doing human rights work even more dangerous and difficult for Chinese citizens.”

Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International are calling on the IOC to establish a more rigorous process for assessing the human-rights records of countries which bid for and host future Olympics.

Worden said there was urgent need for such reform, given that Russia will be hosting the 2014 Winter Games.

Slide show
81972276
  Emotional Moments from Day 12
From field hockey to basketball, Olympic teammates pull each other up at the Games.

more photos

“The Olympics-related rights violations well documented in China — forced evictions, abuse of migrant workers, repression of civil society — will almost certainly be replayed in Russia,” Worden wrote last week in a commentary for the International Herald Tribune. “But it could get even uglier: In Russia, journalists are not only harassed, they are sometimes murdered.”

Mark Allison, a Hong Kong-based researcher for Amnesty International, expressed dismay over the detentions of numerous Chinese activists in recent weeks. He alleged that Chinese authorities were expanding the use of “re-education through labor” — a punishment which can be imposed without trial or judicial review — and bemoaned the lack of public comment by the IOC.

“Silent diplomacy is fine but it has to be matched by change on the ground,” Allison said by telephone. “If there’s no evidence of change, you have to back that up with public pressure.”

He said human rights should be a higher priority as cities compete to host the games, and urged the IOC to develop a “concrete way” of measuring their records.

Video
  In 'protest zone,' a conspicuous silence
Aug. 18: Human Rights groups estimate that almost 40 activists have been detained or deported since the Opening Ceremonies, leaving the three approved demonstration parks empty.

Nightly News

The IOC has met with Amnesty and Human Rights Watch, but IOC spokeswoman Giselle Davies indicated their proposals would likely be rebuffed.

“We’re a sports organization. ... we stay clearly within our role, which is to bring sport to host countries,” she said Wednesday. “We’re not an organization that is best placed or has the capacity to deal with human rights issues.”

At the daily Olympic press briefing, journalists have been given short, blunt responses to questions about the outlawed spiritual group Falun Gong and the Free Tibet movement, whose supporters have staged several protests during the games.

“Tibet is part of China — the whole world knows that,” said Wang Wei, a top official of Beijing’s Olympic organizing committee. “The Free Tibet movement is not welcome here.”

An example of how warily some athletes are approaching these controversies: A pro-Tibet group said Wednesday that more than 40 Olympians in China had downloaded a “Songs for Tibet” album in solidarity with the cause, but the group said it wanted to protect the athletes’ anonymity, and no names were released.


Sponsored links

Resource guide