Skip navigation

Bigger, tougher fires bring Calif. to the brink


< Prev | 1 | 2
Video: Life  
Couple, dogs rescued at sea
Nov. 15: After setting off from San Francisco in a small boat, Hawaii-bound Christopher Miller and Brandy Meisner ran into bad weather, and big trouble. The pair joins NBC’s Jenna Wolfe to recount their ordeal.

  Photo features  
  More
Image: Kalsoom, 6, who was fleeing a military offensive in South Waziristan, sits in a queue with others to receive food handouts at a distribution point for IDPs in Dera Ismail Khan
Reuters
  The Week in Pictures
Monsoon floods in Malaysia, darkened streets in Brazil and celebratory lights in Germany highlight this collection of noteworthy images.
Image: Jon Bon Jovi greets an ecstatic veteran.
AP
PhotoBlog
View and discuss the pictures and issues that caught our eyes.

The question for California is what to do now.

Schwarzenegger, a Republican, has proposed a 1.4 percent surcharge on residential and commercial property insurance premiums in areas at high risk of fires, floods or earthquakes — about 80 percent of the state. Homeowners in the other areas would pay a 0.75 percent premium.

Democrats who control the Legislature doubled those percentages in their budget proposal, expecting to raise $280 million annually for emergency response costs. Under their plan, an average California homeowner would pay an additional $25.20 a year for living in a high danger area or $13.50 for those in lower risk areas.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

State Sen. Christine Kehoe, a Democrat from San Diego, has a separate proposal to charge $50 a year to property owners in rural areas that fall within the state's firefighting responsibility, which amounts to one-third of California and includes nearly 1 million homes, with thousands more being built and planned for fire-prone areas.

She projects the $50 fee would raise $45 million a year for fire protection. Her bill passed the state Senate and is awaiting consideration in the Assembly.

Twenty-nine states, including California, maintain a fund for responding to natural disasters. But only three — Florida, Indiana and Maine — assess a special surcharge or fee to pay for them.

Rural counties and legislators in California object that their residents already pay extra for fire protection and shouldn't be taxed twice as they would under Kehoe's proposal. Kehoe counters that California needs both her proposal and the insurance surcharge being negotiated by Schwarzenegger and legislative leaders.

"We can't afford not to fight fires. Homes and lives are at stake," she said. "These fires are only going to become more frequent and more intense."

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


< Prev | 1 | 2

Sponsored LinksGet listed here
Online College Courses
Boost your career with an online Degree. Pick from Leading Colleges!
www.EarnMyDegree.com

Sponsored links

Resource guide