Minnesota governor looks to national stage
Slide shows |
World reacts to Obama’s victory From the U.S. president-elect’s ancestral homes in Kenya and Ireland to his namesake town in Japan, election fever grips the globe. |
Special coverage |
Discuss on Newsvine |
In the summer of 1980, Mr. Pawlenty — who had gone to the University of Minnesota planning to be a dentist — went to work for Mr. Durenberger, having learned about the internship in a campus newspaper. He returned for six months during Mr. Durenberger’s 1982 campaign, and again, for a year, as the campaign’s political director in 1988.
In 1990, Mr. Durenberger was denounced in the Senate for misconduct involving financial dealings. Bob Schroeder, a spokesman for Mr. Pawlenty, said that Mr. Pawlenty was disappointed with Mr. Durenberger’s troubles, but that those events “occurred years after the governor and senator were in regular contact.”
The two men still talk from time to time, said Mr. Durenberger, whom Mr. Pawlenty appointed three years ago as chairman of a committee on health care policy.
While he was working for Mr. Durenberger, Mr. Pawlenty met Mr. McCain when the senator came to Minnesota, as Mr. Pawlenty recalls it, for a veterans’ program and Mr. Pawlenty (and his wife) volunteered to drive him around. They got to know each other over the better part of two days, Mr. Pawlenty said. They stayed in touch over the years, and Mr. Pawlenty was an early, vocal supporter of Mr. McCain’s presidential bid, even last year when some considered it doomed.
Mr. Pawlenty is high on the short list of candidates Mr. McCain is considering for vice president, according to Republicans familiar with the deliberations. Mr. Pawlenty has campaigned with Mr. McCain and for him, but following the rules set out for potential vice-presidential nominees by Mr. McCain, he has declined to comment on what is going on.
Asked at a press luncheon in Washington what the most important quality of a running mate would be, Mr. Pawlenty responded, “Discretion,” and walked away from the microphone.
In his own races for governor, in 2002 and 2006, Mr. Pawlenty won with pluralities, not majorities, the most recent being ever so narrow: 47 percent to 46 percent.
Nonetheless, Mr. Pawlenty’s advocates consider the results to be remarkable shows of strength, considering the races had third-party candidates in a state with a tradition of strong Democrats like Hubert H. Humphrey, Eugene J. McCarthy, Walter F. Mondale and Paul Wellstone, and a tradition of electing iconoclastic governors, including Jesse Ventura and Rudy Perpich.
But those margins have led others to question Mr. Pawlenty’s popularity here, and whether his presence on the Republican ticket could even secure Minnesota, which has supported Democratic presidential candidates since 1976.
“This is not a fellow who is going to come across as strikingly charismatic,” said Steven Schier, a political scientist at Carleton College. “People see that he’s smart and competent, but there’s not much sizzle.”
Before crowds, Mr. Pawlenty seems comfortable and warm. He speaks, at times, without visible notes. He quotes from books, sports interviews and magazines, and can turn wonky, delving into energy and education policy, then veer back to regular-guy talk, as he did last week, when he told a crowd in Chicago that the health care system was “flat busted.”
The prospect of Mr. Pawlenty as Mr. McCain’s attack dog makes some here chuckle a little. Even some who have run against Mr. Pawlenty describe him as fun, winsome, slightly corny and playful, even nice. He has played baseball outside the State House during a break in a tense legislative session. He has shot a hockey puck inside his ornate reception room.
Roger Moe, the Democrat who lost to Mr. Pawlenty in 2002, remembered Mr. Pawlenty quietly leaning over near the end of a candidate forum and offering him a lift home.
“Why don’t you ride with me?” Mr. Moe recalled Mr. Pawlenty offering. “We’ve got this big plane.”
So there they were, foes in the middle of a campaign, sharing beers and gossip on the way home.
While Mr. Pawlenty wins praise from social and fiscal conservatives, several episodes in his past — and his recent talk of renewable energy standards — have left some wondering whether he is truly one of them.
Fifteen years ago, while in the State House, Mr. Pawlenty voted to expand rights for gay men and lesbians; he has since said he regrets the vote.
Then, as governor, after a partisan battle with the Legislature and a partial shutdown of the state government, he agreed to a “health impact fee” on cigarettes, irking fiscal conservatives who said he had broken his promise not to raise taxes.
Some also wonder whether Mr. Pawlenty’s brushes with campaign finance and disclosure questions, though rare, might create a conflict with the above-board image put forth by Mr. McCain.
In 2002, only weeks before Election Day, the state’s Republican Party and Mr. Pawlenty’s campaign were accused of illegal coordination over two television advertisements paid for by the state party. Mr. Pawlenty’s campaign paid a $100,000 fine and was required to report a $500,000 in-kind contribution from the state party.
Months after the election, Mr. Pawlenty’s political adversaries raised new questions about whether he had properly disclosed consulting work he did in 2001 and 2002 for a telecom company owned by a longtime associate. Mr. Pawlenty had received $4,500 a month for more than a year, but did not include the consulting fees in the wages section of his financial disclosure form. Instead, he cited the consulting work — and a sole proprietorship company he had created and done the work under — as an investment or a security.
Mr. Pawlenty eventually amended his disclosure forms to include the consulting payments in both sections of the form, and the state’s campaign finance board ultimately found no wrongdoing in the matter.
“He said he was sorry,” said Mr. Moe, Mr. Pawlenty’s Democratic opponent that year. “He always says ‘sorry.’ ”
A year ago, Mr. Pawlenty faced the most visible crisis of his tenure. On a busy Wednesday evening, the Interstate 35W bridge through downtown Minneapolis collapsed, plunging cars into the Mississippi River and killing 13 people.
Many praised Mr. Pawlenty for his swift, empathetic response. The political battle that followed — in what, by 2007, was a Democratic-dominated State House and Senate — was far more complicated.
Democrats raged about the state’s aging bridges and roads, and blamed Mr. Pawlenty for vetoing a gasoline tax increase and for putting Carol Molnau, the lieutenant governor, in charge of the state’s Transportation Department.
After months of argument, the Legislature this year passed a transportation package that included a gasoline tax increase. Mr. Pawlenty vetoed it, but was overridden for the first time.
Mr. Pawlenty vetoed the package because it contained $6.6 billion in tax increases and hundreds of millions of dollars in additional local sales taxes, aides said. But Lawrence J. Pogemiller, the Senate majority leader, said Mr. Pawlenty had waffled over the gasoline tax increase. Mr. Pogemiller said Mr. Pawlenty had called him for a meeting two days after the bridge collapse and had said he would support a gas tax increase, only to withdraw that support three days later under criticism from conservatives. The governor’s aides dispute that account.
“Look,” Mr. Pogemiller said, “to me, this is verification that he does and says whatever is necessary to look good at the moment.”
Mrs. Pawlenty dismissed claims that her husband’s ambitions had driven policy choices. “That’s not who he is,” she said.
Nor, for that matter, she added, has Mr. McCain’s vice-presidential search driven her husband’s hairstyle. The governor has cut and grown out his hair at various times over the years, she said.
This article, "Minnesota Governor Looks to National Stage", first appeared in The New York Times.
|
|
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES |
Sponsored links
Resource guide



