updated 11:57 a.m. ET Aug. 8, 2008

GREEN BAY, Wis. - By signing the papers, Green Bay Packers general manager Ted Thompson knew he would become the man who traded Brett Favre.

And that a lot of fans wouldn’t be happy.

“It might be the death of a franchise,” Walt Fontain said Thursday outside Lambeau Field. “This is like Buddy Holly. The day the music died. It is sad for all sports fans because this guy was not done. It is not that he was hanging on.”

Thompson understood the anguish. Not easy to get rid of the face of the franchise.

“I don’t think anybody would be comfortable with that,” he said after trading Favre to the New York Jets late Wednesday night. “This is in many ways sad that this is where it came to. At the end of the day, though, we felt like — I think all the parties involved felt like — it was the best solution to a very difficult situation.”

To the Packers, there was no winning formula to their awkward and tense monthlong standoff with their star quarterback.

Packers president Mark Murphy urged fans not to assess blame either way.

“It wasn’t Brett’s fault, and it wasn’t our fault,” Murphy said. “But the relationship got to the point where it couldn’t go forward. Don’t try to blame either side. It’s like a marriage that ends. It happens. And neither party is at fault, but you move forward.”

Yes, Green Bay traded away perhaps the most beloved player in team history and will be without a three-time MVP who might still have a couple of good years left in him.

The team took a public relations beating as tensions escalated over the past month, though many fans who have tired of Favre’s incessant waffling on his football future backed the front office.

But along with the reported conditional draft pick they’re getting in return from the Jets, the Packers also receive much-needed closure to one of the messiest splits between a team and its star player in recent memory.

“This is really a bittersweet time for the organization,” Murphy said. “I think we’re all sad to see Brett Favre’s career as a Packer end. But we are glad that this matter has come to closure in a way that’s good for the team and good for Brett.”

Despite obvious signs earlier this week that the split between the Packers and Favre was fractured beyond repair, team officials again found themselves fending off questions about why the team wouldn’t play Favre instead of Aaron Rodgers because Favre gives them the best chance to win.

When pressed, Packers coach Mike McCarthy admitted that he would have given Favre the chance to “compete for his position,” although it was not clear whether that meant competing for the starting job.

But McCarthy reiterated several times that talks between he and Favre earlier in the week “never got to that point” — presumably meaning Favre couldn’t commit to the Packers because he couldn’t get past his animosity toward the team’s management, and perhaps couldn’t stomach the thought of disrupting team chemistry any more than he already had.

Packers trade Favre to Jets Opinion: Favre bigger than Jeter, A-Rod in NYC Curran: Brett in Big Apple? Let fun begin! Ask the Expert: Is Favre too old at age 38? Opinion: History tells us this just won't fly Favre to make big splash  |  No, he won't Timeline of events leading up to trade Vote: How will Jets fare with Favre? Vote: Jets or Packers to go further in 08? Fantasy impact: Don't expect big numbers Opinion: Packers' actions are pure insanity   Slide show: A record-breaking career

“I was just looking for him to tell me that he was ready to play for the Green Bay Packers,” McCarthy said. “And if we would have got to that point, then our conversation would have continued. And it did not get to that point.”

Packers officials were careful not to criticize Favre on Thursday. Left unsaid was the fact that Favre’s high-maintenance tendencies are the Jets’ problem now.

Thompson, who has absorbed considerable public criticism from Favre in the past month, nevertheless wished him well. Of course, it probably helps that the Packers won’t play the Jets this year unless it’s in the Super Bowl.

“Despite opinions to the contrary, I like Brett a lot,” Thompson said. “I’d love to see him have the time of his life.”

Murphy said the team obviously won’t retire Favre’s jersey as planned during the Sept. 8 season opener against Minnesota, but will sometime in the future.

McCarthy said Favre wants to have a long-term relationship with the Packers, perhaps even helping Packers quarterbacks in future training camps after he really retires.

“I told him he could help with the quarterbacks, but I don’t want any new plays,” McCarthy joked. “This is important to him. He recognizes that. When you step out of what’s happened and everything, he has a very positive opinion about the fans, the experience he’s had with his family. He didn’t want to do this to his teammates any more. He felt it clearly went on long enough.”

MORE FROM NFL

NFL Section Front

Falcons need 11 seconds to beat Bears   Rams stun Redskins at 0:00 for first victory Texans in another wild finish, but win this time Vikings escape vs. Lions on late dramatics   Cable's Raiders debut a breeze ... for Saints Garcia gives Bucs big boost to beat Panthers Return to form: Colts' offense shreds Ravens   Rusty Jets keep Palmer-less Bengals winless Opinion: Bengals don't Bungle, just lose Live: Updates on Sunday's NFL Week 6 games NFL Section Front   Add NFL headlines to your news reader: