Hagel visible, but may not be viable as veep

Tom Curry National affairs writer • Profile • E-mail

WASHINGTON - Were we looking at Barack Obama’s running mate, perhaps the next vice president of the United States on Wednesday afternoon?

You couldn’t help but wonder, as Sen. Chuck Hagel, R- Neb., showed up at the Washington think tank, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), to discuss his new book, "America: Our Next Chapter," before an audience of Washington insiders, business executives, and diplomats.

In the inside-the-Beltway scuttlebutt about Obama’s running mate, Hagel’s name comes up as do the names of such Democrats as Sen. Jim Webb of Virginia and Gov. Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas, and a few non-politicians, such as retired Marine Corps Gen. James Jones, a former NATO commander.

The speculation about Jones seemed ill-founded Wednesday after the general appeared with Sen. John McCain at a campaign event in Missouri.

Some Democrats think Obama would be smart to pick Hagel.

One veteran Senate Democratic staffer, speaking on condition he not be identified by name, called Hagel “the strongest pick Obama could make, particularly if he is serious about his ‘there are no red states, there are no blue states’ rhetoric. After eight years of division, it would be the most immediately healing gesture that Obama could make, as well as a gutsy, brilliant political move, too.”

One must go back to the Civil War to find a presidential candidate crossing party lines for his running mate. Republican Abraham Lincoln, an Illinoisan like Obama, chose Democrat Andrew Johnson to run with him in 1864.

Hagel still neutral in presidential race
Hagel seems to be in no hurry to say which presidential candidate he’ll support, Obama or McCain, for whom he campaigned in 2000 when McCain vied with George W. Bush for the Republican nomination.

Video Iraq mess unavoidable April 1: Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., says that the United States is in a mess in Iraq, no matter what direction events go. Morning Joe

“John is an old friend, and we talk often,” Hagel said in an interview Wednesday after his CSIS speech.

But he also said, “I may not endorse anyone."

Would he accept if Obama asked him to be his running mate?

“If one of those men asked me to consider it, I’d have to consider it, of course,” he said.

He added: “This country is in some trouble” and therefore “bringing the country together is going to be the biggest part of the next president’s responsibilities” — a compelling argument, it would seem, for a bipartisan ticket.

And Hagel might bring some distinct strengths to the Democratic ticket.

He’d put Nebraska’s five electoral votes in play, something that hasn’t been the case since 1964.

As a senior Republican on the Foreign Relations Committee, he has travelled widely abroad and is fluent in discussing Pakistan, nuclear non-proliferation and other topics.

An Army combat veteran of the Vietnam War, Hagel has been the harshest critic in the Republican Party of President Bush’s Iraq policy.

He voted for the 2002 Iraq war resolution, but he greeted Bush’s announcement of the troop surge last year with disdain.

It was, he said, “dangerously wrongheaded” and would lead to more American casualties and more billions of dollars spent.

Calls Bush 'confused' on Iran
Last month Hagel assailed Bush when the president delivered a speech to the Israeli Knesset in which he criticized those who “believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along.”

Democrats took that remark as an attack on Obama.

“I don’t know if the president was confused and if he was referencing Iran, or if he was referencing terrorists,” Hagel said last month.

He added, “I agree with Sen. Obama and many of us who have talked about engaging Iran.”

Bush, he said, “diminishes the office (of president) when he allows himself to sink down into the underbrush of petty politics.”

And Hagel seems disgusted by politics, petty or otherwise, as it's now practiced in Washington.

In his CSIS speech, he complained about candidates, whom he did not name, “pandering” to voters in manufacturing states such as Ohio, falsely promising that “if you elect me, I’ll get your jobs back.”

He derided political consultants as “assassins” and grumbled that politicians have “debased the debate” on international trade. 

Musing about impeachment
Last year, Hagel caused a flutter of excitement by musing that Bush could be impeached. “And before this is over, you might see calls for his impeachment,” he told Esquire magazine.

But despite the admiration Democrats have for Hagel because of his harsh words about Bush, Democratic consultant Chris Kofinis makes the case that this isn’t the year for the Democrats to put a Republican on the ticket.

“A bipartisan ticket may sound intriguing on paper, but it’s not realistic,” Kofinis said Wednesday.

Video McCain on oil drilling June 17: MSNBC analyst Chuck Todd assesses the effects of oil prices on the November election. He wonders if a candidate can win a coastal state while trying to lift the ban on offshore drilling. Morning Joe

“With Democratic winds blowing in our favor, coupled with a rich number of Democrats who would make a great vice president for Sen. Obama, the chances of any Republican, even Chuck Hagel, being selected as Obama's VP are, in my opinion, slim and none.”

There is, after all, the matter of Hagel’s voting record.

In a year in which some people are talking about “bridging the partisan divide,” can a voting record still matter? If so, there is much in Hagel’s history to give pause to Democratic constituencies.

Take one hot issue right now: oil drilling.

Hagel voted in 2002 and 2005 to permit oil drilling in a portion of Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, a position anathema to most Democrats.

And Hagel said Wednesday that he fully supports McCain’s call this week for ending the moratorium on offshore oil drilling.

“That’s been my position all along,” Hagel said.

He added for good measure that the ANWR drilling issue has been “intentionally misrepresented” by oil drilling foes.

MORE FROM DECISION '08

Decision '08 Section Front

NYT: Palin's fusion of politics, motherhood Cheney: Nothing stopping Palin from doing job Newsweek: Has GOP found its innner feminist? McCain moves ahead of Obama in new poll New Yorker: The price McCain pays New roles for Olbermann, Matthews Newsweek: What Palin really believes Obama plans meeting with Bill Clinton Obama says he regrets abortion answer  Family's place in Palin's politics Decision '08 Section Front   Add Decision '08 headlines to your news reader: