Strike not to blame for drop in TV viewership

As the final weeks of the 2007/2008 television season unfold, one theme keeps reappearing in news reports: We’re watching less TV.

While some shows have had increased ratings, most have suffered from lower ratings compared to last fall. Now, "American Idol" makes headlines not because of performances, but because fewer people, especially in key demographics, are watching than before.

Why is that? Decreased ratings have many causes, but what underlies them all is that television is undergoing a fundamental change that was highlighted — and maybe even accelerated — by the recent writers' strike.

The strike has taken much of the blame because ratings didn't really drop until after it occurred. Data from Nielsen, the company that tracks viewership, shows that "overall (TV) usage has not yet seen a real dramatic decline," as "up until the strike, we had not seen any drop in overall usage," according to Anne Kissel Elliot, Nielsen's vice president of communications. Because of that, she said, "I think it would be a little premature to use this season as a harbinger of things to come."

While lower ratings have resulted from the strike, blaming it alone is unfair. Joe Rhodes, a contributing writer for TV Guide, said the strike "provided an easy scapegoat for executives who don't want to be held responsible for the lower numbers. But even if there had been no strike and even if there had been a slew of spectacularly compelling new shows, the numbers would have continued to shrink. As they will next year and the year after that."

Slide show   Hollywood on strike Members of the Writers Guild of America are joined on the picket line by several of TV’s hottest stars. more photos

He attributes that to "fewer quality new shows" and "the increasing obsolescence of the ratings system. People are still watching TV, they're just not watching it in the same way or in a way that can be measured by the ACNielsen company."

Elliot confirmed, "There's no question that it's a rapidly changing environment and we're doing our best to keep pace with it. Given that television advertising is something like a $70 billion a year (industry), we have to make changes. But I think it's premature to say that you can't measure it at all."

Still, she said there has been significant change in recent years, especially as viewers have fled from network TV to cable, where there are hundreds of choices. That fragmentation of audience means lower ratings for some shows.

Viewers were encouraged to try cable during the three-month-long strike because those channels offered new content, according to Joe Fahs, co-founder of the television blog TVgasm. "The strike hurt not only because it starved the networks of new programming, but it pushed the viewers who wanted to watch TV to look for alternatives, and that alternative was things like cable. And even though the cable networks were showing a lot of repeats, those episodes would be new if people were just discovering them," he said.

The overall shift to cable may introduce some viewers to new shows, but it also means quality programming has a more limited audience. "Network TV is becoming a repository for more simple-minded comedies and reality television," said Eric Deggans, the TV and media critic for the St. Petersburg Times, while "very complex, big ticket dramas are on cable. … I think that's a loss because people who can't afford cable are going to end up being deprived of great television."

The strike's impact
The break caused by the strike also "allowed viewers to mentally 'check out' like they do every summer, and that's exactly when they start investigating new content on cable and the Internet," said Ben Mandelker, TVgasm's other founder. Just strike coverage alone impacted viewership. "Truth be told, there was actually a good amount of TV on this winter despite the strike, but in people's minds, there was nothing on because of all the strike coverage. It was the perfect way to drive viewers away," he said.

Worse, when shows returned in March and April, networks didn't communicate effectively to viewers. "Since the strike was over, I think there was a lot of confusion on when series were coming back," Fahs said. "People who read blogs have a better idea, but if I was a normal TV watcher, I would have just given up."

The shows that don't stand out may die premature deaths because the Internet is impacting TV. "With blogs, forums, discussion boards, and news media weighing on every little detail about a show, the tide can turn quickly," Mandelker said. "Bad buzz seems to have a larger impact than good buzz, and as we all know, bad buzz leads to bad ratings."

MORE FROM TELEVISION OPINIONS

40 years of diversity on ‘Sesame Street’

40 years of diversity on ‘Sesame Street’ Is Leno’s 10 p.m. experiment nearing an end? TV snobs are wrong about ‘Two and a Half Men’ For ‘Big Bang’s’ Sheldon, the nerd is the word Sykes and late night TV’s new color barrier Proudly un-hip, ‘NCIS’ still tops ratings Monty Python the original kings of gore ‘Glee’ has rabid fans, but they deserve better Newsweek: Is 'FlashForward' the next 'Lost'? Newsweek: 5 flagging TV shows that need to end   Add Television Opinions headlines to your news reader: