Skip navigation

Automakers have designs on global gains

Your next Chrysler or Buick could be designed in Europe or China

Ed Welburn, vice president of GM Global Design, introduces the Buick Riviera coupe concept — a new vehicle that was designed in China.
Gary Malerba / AP
By Roland Jones
MSNBC
updated 7:17 p.m. ET April 8, 2008

Roland Jones

E-mail
With the largest collection of design studios backed by the world’s largest automobile manufacturers, Southern California has been seen as the undisputed hub of automobile design for decades. But your next Ford or Chrysler could be designed in Europe, or China.

The first automobile design studios appeared in Southern California in the 1970s and just over a dozen have sprung up since then. With its multicultural environment, car culture and trend-setting reputation, Los Angles was seen as a haven removed from the big automakers’ Midwest headquarters where vehicle designers have the freedom to think outside the box.

Car manufacturers have felt it important to keep up with the latest design trends to keep their car designs fresh, and the latest car trends, such as oversized wheels, started out in California before they caught on nationwide.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement

But now, just as each of the three big U.S. automakers are engaged in large-scale cost-cutting and restructuring programs to bring their North American operations back to profitability, they’re also investing in engineering, design and development centers overseas, aiming to draw on design talents from other regions and develop a more global business outlook.

Perhaps the most striking example of this trend was seen in March when Chrysler said it plans to close down its Pacifica Advance Product Design Center in Carlsbad, Calif. — a studio that focused on vehicle trends decades into the future and had a part in designing some of the U.S. automaker’s biggest recent hits, including the Chrysler 300 sedan.

The decision to center design operations near the company’s headquarters in Auburn Hills, Mich., was not necessarily to shave costs at the automaker, which was acquired last year by private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management for $7.4 billion, having struggled under the ownership of Germany’s Daimler-Benz since 1998, but rather as part of the company’s new global focus, according to Jim Press, Chrysler’s vice-chairman and president.

“There was some foresight in moving design to Los Angeles 30 years ago, but now you’re getting design inputs from all over the world,” said Press in an interview at this year’s New York auto show in March. Vehicle design is becoming less Los Angles-centric and more global, he noted.

Press pointed to Chrysler’s plan to develop a global B-category car — entry-level compact vehicles — with Chinese automaker Chery Automobile to compete with small, inexpensive and fuel-efficient cars like the Chevrolet Aveo, Honda’s Fit and Toyota’s Yaris.

“I think it’s a mistake for Chrysler to close this studio,” said Aaron Bragman, an industry analyst at Global Insight. “I can see why they’d do it to save money, but it takes a very powerful and influential force out of their design team, and California is still one of the big design centers of the world because it’s cosmopolitan and has influences from all over the world, especially from Asia, and you just don’t get that in Detroit.”

Bragman also notes that operating a business division in California is expensive, given the salaries demanded by workers and local taxes. Nissan, for example, moved its U.S. headquarters from southern California to Nashville, Tenn., last summer to save on costs, he noted, although Nissan Design America, one of the Japanese automaker’s U.S. design centers, remains in San Diego.

And when it comes to playing on the global stage, Chrysler’s ability to expand internationally is questionable, Bragman said. Last year, just 9 percent of the automaker’s sales came from overseas operations, whereas GM saw some 60 percent of its sales revenue come from international sources, he said.