Skip navigation

'Pig book' puts pet spending in spotlight

But annual Washington ritual of mockery diverts from bigger outlays

Video
  Report lifts lid on pork barrel spending
April 2: "Pork" projects cost taxpayers more than $17 billion last year, according to a new report published by a congressional watchdog group. MSNBC's Mike Viqueira reports.

MSNBC

Video: Capitol Hill  
  
Congress informed enough to vote?
July 9: Newsweek’s Howard Fineman talks about the damaging effects the eight-year deception by the CIA will have on the government.

INTERACTIVE
(FILES) This29 October 2006 file photo s
Rate the justices
Who's tops and who's not? Rate your high court members.

msnbc.com

INTERACTIVE
Get political at Newsvine
Read, rate and discuss the latest news.
Slideshow
  The Week in Political Cartoons
Msnbc.com’s political cartoonists take a look back at the past week.

more photos

By Tom Curry
National affairs writer
msnbc.com
updated 7:16 a.m. ET April 3, 2008

Tom Curry
National affairs writer

E-mail
WASHINGTON - It’s a barrel of “pork” worth some $17.2 billion.

According to Citizens Against Government Waste, the tally adds up 11,610 individual pet projects inserted in spending bills during the fiscal year which ended on Sept. 30, 2007.

The 18th annual inventory, called the “Pig Book," ranges from $195,000 for a program to help ex-convicts in Memphis, Tenn. adjust to life outside prison walls, to $1.6 million for tracking the health of soldiers with advanced implantable nano-sensors.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

Citizens Against Government Waste, a non-partisan advocacy group that opposes what it sees as waste and inefficiency in the federal government, culled through spending items using several criteria.

Serving only a local interest
For example, the projects it selected had to serve only a local interest, were not requested by an executive branch department, and weren't the subject of any congressional hearings, meaning money for them was handed out without public scrutiny.

The group named three Republicans on the Senate Appropriations Committee as the top “porkers” of 2008. Combined, the trio was responsible for more than $1.8 billion in projects.

Taking the honors:

  • Sen. Thad Cochran, R-Miss. ($892 million)
  • Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska ($469 million)
  • Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala. ($465 million)

CAGW also needled Maine Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe for sponsoring $188,000 for their state’s Lobster Institute.

A case of narcissism?
In addition, CAGW mockingly honored House Ways and Means Committee chairman Rep. Charles Rangel, D- N.Y. with its “Narcissist Award” for the $1.95 million which went to the "Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service" at the City College of New York.

Last year, Rep. John Campbell, R- Calif. protested the federal money going to the Rangel project. "I really do not think this is a road we want to go down, where we, as Members, have the ability to create and name things after ourselves using public funds while we are in office," he said.

But Rangel promptly took to the House floor to defend himself, explaining that $25 million in private funds had been raised for the center, based on the use of his name.

"As flattered as I am that they are using my name, I am thoroughly convinced that the only reason they are using my name is the ability to attract funds to get this thing going," Rangel told Campbell.

He also told the California Republican that "in my community, where only four out of 10 kids manage to finish high school, I've devoted my entire life in working with the public and private sector in trying to keep our kids in school... As we move toward globalization, it is going to be far more important for every young person ...to get the education, and to compete."

Rangel told Campbell that "I would have a problem if you did it" — had federal money funneled to a center with Campbell's name on it.

"I don't think that you've been around long enough that having your name on something to inspire a building like this in a school," Rangel said.

Campbell was first elected to the House in 2005, Rangel in 1970.

Only a small fraction of total spending
Despite the criticism which CAGW aimed at the spending projects, two constants remain true this year, as in previous years.

One constant is that even at $17.2 billion, earmarked projects remain a tiny portion — about six-tenths of one percent — of the $2.7 trillion in total federal spending.

Compared to entitlement programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, which automatically provide benefits to anyone legally eligible for them, earmarked spending is small. Taxpayers spent $628 billion on Medicare and Medicaid last year, $610 billion more than this year's barrel of "pork."


Sponsored links

Resource guide